Sentences with phrase «same person they are speaking»

After all, companies use the interview as an opportunity to validate that the person they read about in the resume is the same person they are speaking with and that the candidate has that special something they are looking for.

Not exact matches

I used public transportation, lived in the same area as the people I was working with, ate the same foods, and listened more than I spoke.

We all go to the doctor to see how our body is functioning and we speak with retirement professionals to see what life after work will look like, so why not give your business that same kind of assessment for your most important asset — your people?

«Bands always, always hire by values first and once the person looks right, feels right, speaks the same language, then he's allowed to get up and jam with the band,» he says.

Instead of waiting long periods of time for the next person to speak up, everyone will be prepared to talk through ideas and you'll have a much greater chance of deciding the best course of action that same day.

Marketing and sales were brother and sister, not distant cousins, and the same tactics I was using in my copywriting could be applied to in - person sales, public speaking and more.

[When you] start to make a habit of realizing that formal leadership isn't the same thing as running a discussion, you make it easier to have a culture where people can speak up and, if they know something relevant, take the lead.»

And he's not the only person I spoke with who shared the same sentiment.

When people speak the same language, there's less of a learning curve when talking about the technology.

«A big chill came across Silicon Valley in the wake of all these stories, and people are hyperaware and scared of behaving wrongly, so I think they're drawing all kinds of parameters,» said a venture capitalist who spoke anonymously for the same reason.

Also, be mindful that people surf the web using natural lingo — they type the same words they speak.

Making matters worse, it's not uncommon that the person who lives with the problem doesn't speak the same language that the people who allocate resources do.

He is not trying to offend anyone, he merely speaks to the religious in the same tone they speak to us, as in informed person trying to show the less informed why they should listen.

And the same can be true of the Edomites spoken of in the Bible — that many scientists scoffed at the idea as if they were a made up people, that is, until the discovery of the city of Petra.

At the same time, people who go into ministry speak of being called by God.

I can look at a conference docket and assume automatically I don't like this person, because so - and - so spoke at 10 am on the same stage.

No it has not been proven where did you see that on an alien special on a & e, Read up on it those other religions did not have Jesus as a Savior and did not have men writing 1000s of years apart talking about the same events, and phrophecizing about things that happened in later chapters written hundreds of years later... and in no bok any where was there a man like Jesus, who spoke the words that Jesus spoke and died for people who hated Him like Jesus did, and spoke the parabales and life lessons like Jesus did... look at what Jesus spoke... read it nowhere has there been a better teacher of life then in His words.

For years, people knew if they spoke out against Driscoll, the Acts29 Network would work into overdrive to ensure they were persona non grata at any church or conference in this network — same dynamic was in place with the EV network.

But that's because He's used the same Scripture to speak different things to different people, which imo shouldn't really surprise us.

One of the smartest men in history has spoken, perhaps there really isn't a dude with a beard because the same people that conjured him up also believed in fire breathing dragons and a flat earth.

At the same time it was estimated that there yet remained five hundred to a thousand other language groups spoken by substantial numbers of people into which translations should be made, and many of them will be.

So when a gay person says he loves his partner, that is the same kind of love the pedophile is speaking about because it's not biblical.

Whereas The Broken Covenant was the voice of a prophet crying in the wilderness, alternately denouncing and lamenting for his people, Habits and its successor volume The Good Society, written by the same five authors and to be published in 1991, speak as one group of citizens to our fellow citizens, criticizing some things but also encouraging, offering examples of effective citizenship and church membership, and looking forward, if not with optimism, at least with hope.

A ten - year - old girl named Olga, who lived in the hotel with her father and sister, spoke of her frightened and broken spirit: «Sometimes when I wake up and Daddy is in a separate bed, and I see I'm in a shelter, and all of the people in the same room... there's no privacy.»

In an article written while he was in the United States, Bonhoeffer spoke of Christ as «the personal revelation, the personal presence of God in the world».10 Again, in the same article, he brought together the three important conceptions — person, transcendence and God:

Case in point: I have actually had the Lord SAY things to me that some other person I met somewhere else had an exact same story of the Lord saying the exact same freaky thing to them — and I KNOW this person didn't know my story, and now I'm feeling I'd be illegitimate to tell him that the Lord spoke the exact same thing to me, because he shared his story first.

The same people that rightly speak of the evil of Sandusky to actually create a «charity» to facilitate his perversion are blinded to the obvious parallel.

The fundamental (excuse the pun) problems with far - right Christianity are exactly the same issues our Savior spoke about to the Pharisees: judgmentalism, hypocrisy, intolerance, and the hyper - extremity of observing the letter of the law rather than its spirit (as evidenced by statements from various preachers that people such gays and disobedient children should be killed).

It's a greater fantasy NOT to believe that there is an all powerful invisible god somewhere in the universe who knows everything, can do anything, hears everyone's thoughts, etc, or that someone died and rose from the dead three days later (this same person was born of a virgin), or that someone spoke to god via a burning bush, or that one old man, who lived to be 900 years old, built a boat that held two of every animal on the earth to survive a worldwide flood?

I prefer to speak a clear spoken language that does not tie up a persons faith to eternal wars that GOD warns us against the new world order but those same fundie evangelicals are the ones who go against the BIBLE and builds the events of the end times in GODS name ven thogh GOD says he is against it anyway!

To put it in the way in which others have spoken, both eucharistic celebration and proclamation of the gospel should always be in a fashion that is appropriate to the witness of the Christian past and at the same time available for the thinking and feeling of the people who take part.

Nor can it be wisdom to talk of this eternal element in the same vein as if one were speaking of the past, as if it is past and past in the sense that it can never, not even in repentance, relate itself to a present person but only to an absent one.

Some like John Jay tried all at once the strategies of ignoring, overwhelming and inventing when he claimed that the emerging republic was «one connected country» and «one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in manners and customs.»

There will always be people who speak good of him and the the LDS Church, and of course, there will always be those who speak evil of the same.

At the same time it is instructive to remember that these creeds speak mainly to the doctrines of God and the person of Christ.

«I spoke to people who were part of Carlton's [church], who were still very close to him but just don't worship alongside him or in the same place,» he says.

Historian David Ramsay wrote to South Carolinians to «consider the - people of all the thirteen states, as a band of brethren, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, inhabiting one undivided country, and designed by heaven to be one people,» but the religion is unspecified.

But these same people you speak of are also the ones that will say they're «pro-life» but then be pro death penalty (though I'm not against the death penalty myself in certain cases) and usually are all ready to go to war, don't support programs that help these children once they are born, etc..

What spoke to me through this story, is how much this pastor knew the people in his church (you and I have the same definition of church, however I'm using the word here as it applies to this group of people I feel the problem in many churches today (and why dialogue during sermons wouldn't go over well) is that the pastors do not take the time to invest in the people they are trying to teach.

What Mark S. and others are clearly pointing out that these church people can say anything at Citizens of the US and if they want to speak in an official capacity for the church, that's fine too, but they should in no way be invited to the planning table with the joint chiefs the same way that PETA can stomp their feet all they want to but aren't actually involved with congress on how to tax meat products.

«We wouldn't see them when we go to Westminster to protest; when ten people had to sign [an open letter] to speak about the Church's stand on same sex marriage, to which some of us are today being persecuted, they were nowhere to be found.

Dailey continued to describe how he gave people joy: «One of my colleagues who did speak to him said that he was clearly the same fun loving man in real life as came across on the stage and that kind of joy and happiness is something all Christians should seek to give the world.»

But religious love is only man's natural emotion of love directed to a religious object; religious fear is only the ordinary fear of commerce, so to speak, the common quaking of the human breast, in so far as the notion of divine retribution may arouse it; religious awe is the same organic thrill which we feel in a forest at twilight, or in a mountain gorge; only this time it comes over us at the thought of our supernatural relations; and similarly of all the various sentiments which may be called into play in the lives of religious persons.

When the bible was written, marriages weren't based on love, so the love between same sex people wasn't explored and was only spoken of between David and Jonathan.

Speaking of Jesus in this way may seem to make him merely one of many great men, exceptional but not superhuman, not the divine being he is believed by Christians to be; but however his person and nature are understood, I for one can not believe that even in him God acted in any way inconsistent with the same natural laws and operations by which he works today.

12 - 14) Speaking is to be in love, he said, for, properly understood, speaking and love travel the same street — from person toSpeaking is to be in love, he said, for, properly understood, speaking and love travel the same street — from person tospeaking and love travel the same street — from person to person.

If it interests you or any of your readers, I wrote a book called Nine Lies People Believe About Speaking in Tongues, and deal with many things I see come up in these comments like Paul said you can't speak in tongues in a meeting unless you have an interpreter, speaking several languages allegedly being the same thing as speaking in tongues in the BibleSpeaking in Tongues, and deal with many things I see come up in these comments like Paul said you can't speak in tongues in a meeting unless you have an interpreter, speaking several languages allegedly being the same thing as speaking in tongues in the Biblespeaking several languages allegedly being the same thing as speaking in tongues in the Biblespeaking in tongues in the Bible, etc...

««The» anti-Semite, he seems to imply all through the book, is always the same kind of a person, recognizable at a glance, and, so to speak, in action the whole time.

There should be no Scriptures, because it will sound bad when more than one person speaks the same truths?

New Delhi said: «[This unity] is being made visible as all in each place who are baptized into Jesus Christ and confess him as Lord and Savior are brought by the Holy Spirit into one fully committed fellowship, holding the one apostolic faith, preaching the one gospel, breaking the one bread, joining in common prayer, and having a corporate life reaching out in witness and service to all and who at the same time are united with the whole Christian fellowship in all places and all ages, in such wise that ministry and members are accepted by all, and that all can act and speak together as occasion requires for the tasks to which God calls His people.»