By
the same physical argument, one expects minima in the response to external forcing in the subpolar oceans, since these are being held back by their strong coupling to the deeper layers.
Not exact matches
He can not distinguish questions regarding the existence of the universe from questions regarding its
physical origin; he does not grasp how assertions regarding the absolute must logically differ from assertions regarding contingent beings; he does not know the differences between truths of reason and empirical facts; he has no concept of ontology, in contradistinction to, say, physics or evolutionary biology; he does not understand how assertions regarding transcendental perfections differ from assertions regarding maximum magnitude; he clumsily imagines that the idea of God is susceptible to the
same argument from infinite regress traditionally advanced against materialism; he does not understand what the metaphysical concept of simplicity entails; and on and on.
Can we formulate Paul's
argument convincingly without its blanket condemnation of all
physical love between people of the
same gender?
What is proper to change of place (no matter what
physical reality lies behind it, it can be used simply as a model for the sake of metaphysical
argument), is that to leave one place is to occupy another of the
same ontological rank and vice versa.
Against the plausible
argument that the
physical phenomena described in the narratives require a location in volcanic regions, it is countered that the
same phenomena may be given a natural explanation as manifestations of violent storms.
Then again, the oft - repeated
argument against DRM and anti-piracy measures applies here as well as it does to purchased e-books: piracy is going to happen no matter what kind of DRM publishers use, and the
same risk of piracy exists with
physical books.
The other problem with your
argument is that you seem to be treating printed books — a form of
physical property in which a single copy of intellectual property has been placed — as the
same as an e-book, which is a license to view intellectual property owned by another individual or company.
The Court refuted this
argument, noting that Arline's contagiousness and her
physical impairment each resulted from the
same underlying condition, tuberculosis.