«It's a small bar in Canada, and we see
the same plaintiff counsel over and over and so you have to be mindful, especially if you're a big employer where they know who you are and they think of you as a deep pocket,» she said.
Not exact matches
Plaintiff's counsel replied on September 21, 2011 indicating that if the trial could be heard in Provincial Court in the same time frame as the trial date set in Supreme Court — March 2012 — then the plaintiff would consider the request for a
Plaintiff's
counsel replied on September 21, 2011 indicating that if the trial could be heard in Provincial Court in the
same time frame as the trial date set in Supreme Court — March 2012 — then the
plaintiff would consider the request for a
plaintiff would consider the request for a transfer.
A defendant is entitled to expect that a claim of liability brought against it will be decided by the
same rules of evidence and substantive law whether the
plaintiff is represented by
counsel or self - represented.»
The
plaintiff's
counsel wanted to point to a number of comments in blogs about fires in some of the
same manufacturer's products.
[21] Furthermore, the fact that the
plaintiffs retained the
same legal
counsel to act for them in regard to the wills variation action and the administration of the estate does not amount to a waiver of solicitor - client privilege.
This case provides an important re-statement of the law surrounding requests for further defence medical examinations and rebuts the common presumption of defence
counsel that defendants are permitted to obtain defence medical report (s) in the
same medical specialty to respond to report (s) served by the
plaintiff, irrespective of what reports they have already served.
Plaintiff's
counsel asked to be provided with a copy of the issued claim, «once
same has been done», and enclosed a stamped, self - addressed envelope for the Registrar to return the claim.
The
plaintiff then sued his first
counsel again, on the
same facts.
[243] It is a strange circumstance that defence
counsel asks for an adverse inference that Dr. Cox would have given unfavourable opinion evidence to the
plaintiff at the
same time she says she did not ask Dr. Cox that
same question in the witness box because she wasn't sure what his evidence would be.
The
plaintiffs, though nominally different, were clearly associated and were represented by the
same legal
counsel.
One of the
plaintiffs, Unilab's former general
counsel, claimed that during his tenure he allegedly advised Unilab that the pricing practices violated the Anti-Kickback Statute, and obtained an opinion letter from an outside law firm to the
same effect.