Sentences with phrase «same point i was making»

It's not the same point you are making, but I see it a little differently - to me the demon represents evil and chaos and pain and lies that attack our hearts and minds.
One of the points I am trying to make on this blog is the same point you are making, that the day of the week doesn't matter, nor does the size of the group or the type of building.
The same point was made in Process and Reality, where Whitehead noted that there are no distinct boundaries in the continuum of nature, and thus no distinct boundaries between living organisms and inorganic entities; whatever differences there are is a matter of degree.
(The same point is made in other terms by Hayek, in his defense of the common law.)
The same point is made when Pope's «The Rape of the Lock» is shown to embody a «total situation,» not choosing between convention and economic or biological necessity, but recognizing both the seriousness and the triviality of the rape.
Much the same point is made by the authors of the new BJSM editorial and in Back in the Game, where Kutcher and Gerstner argue that suicide rates among former National Football League players, can be and have been affected by messaging in the media — a phenomenon called the «suicide contagion» — and note how, in its coverage of the suicide of players such as Junior Seau and Dave Duerson, the media has consistently ignored all seven of the recommendations of the Centers of Disease Control on how to avoid spreading that contagion, including not presenting simplistic explanations for suicide, not engaging in repetitive, ongoing, or excessive reporting of suicide, and not sensationalizing suicide.
I agree with some of the same points you are making and the debate part.
Same point I was making.
These same points were made in a 2008 study by Eric A. Hanushek, Dean T. Jamison, Eliot A. Jamison and Ludger Woessmann published in Education Next.
The same point was made in a lapidary phrase by the U.S. Supreme Court in its 1925 Pierce v. Society of Sisters decision: «the child is not the mere creature of the State.»
The same point was made by Robert Primack, «No Substitute for Critical Thinking: A Response to Wynne,» Educational Leadership, December 1985 / January 1986, p. 12.
That's exactly my point — the same point you're making — we can never know what fiction will last and what fiction will remain.
Particularly when I explained to Joe l (here on WUWT) two months before the papers publication exactly the same points I am making here.
Catching up with Andrew Rawnsley's «award winning» column yesterday, Guido could not help think he had read the same points being made, with all the same examples and the same anecdotes, somewhere before.
It brought to mind 2 quotes which pretty much make the same points you are making:

Not exact matches

Wikileaks, in a brief statement Friday on Twitter, made the same point: «Discovery is going to be amazing fun,» said the anti-secrecy group, which has been accused of acting as a cutout for the Kremlin.
For the past 50 years he's made a point of maintaining the same morning routine.
The same could be said for Welter herself — her resumé is impeccable, full of the relevant experience, to the point where a coaching job at the sport's highest level made perfect sense.
According to Jamie Perry, vice president of brand and product development for Jet Blue, the airline made the short film a comedy because you can't preach to people but you can be irreverent and humorous to get the same point across.
The point, Buffett repeats in all his appearances in China, is that by quitting Stanford and trying to make a go of it in music, he was doing the same thing his father did.
For instance, on his blog Baseline Scenario, University of Connecticut law professor James Kwak makes many of the same points as Quittner — the Zuckerberg - Chan donation isn't really a donation at all but a newly formed LLC that will have significant tax benefits for the couple, who will retain almost complete control over their money.
As with the police example Dave mentions, an arrest is an arrest — but picking up jaywalkers isn't the same as busting the ringleader of a gang (exaggerating the point in order to make it).
Law professor Eugene Volokh, who blogs about free speech issues at the Washington Post, has made the same point in the past to argue that Google's (GOOG) choice of search results are a form of free speech.
It makes it more likely that folks will follow through, and if it does get to the point that the plan isn't acted on, everyone's on the same page.»
As Rolling Stone writer Tim Dickinson pointed out in a tweet - storm on Tuesday, his 6.5 million followers make him about the same size as the CBS evening news (although obviously those numbers aren't directly comparable).
Halvorson points out that the «Goal Looms Larger Effect» — the mechanism that makes imminent goals feel all - consuming, like when you're finishing a race or closing a sale, is the same effect that helps people hit deadlines.
When it comes to taking digital pictures, much of the recent focus has been on smartphones — how they now take better pictures than many point - and - shoots did just a few years ago (and why it's now vital to be able to Instagram a shot of your dinner and make a phone call with the same device).
Fake follower counts are based on Points North scanning followers of influencers to sort out such things as accounts making comments in languages that don't make sense for the content or the influencer, or accounts making the exact same comments across multiple influencers and posts.
And that's the point, really: that increased demand for the Canadian dollar affects other industries precisely because it makes the REAL price of Canadian goods higher relative to the same goods produced in other countries, not just nominal price.
Forget the specifics, for a paragraph, because this is a notable development: while these hearings usually devolve into partisan cliches with the same talking points — Democrats want regulations, and Republicans don't — yesterday Senators from both sides of the aisle expressed unease with Facebook's handling of private data; obviously Democrats tried to tie the issue to the last election, but that made the Republicans» shared concern all - the - more striking.
You do not have to use the same exact words in the messages, but the voice used across the different channels, and the point you are making should be identical.
Not only was the Competition Bureau not entitled to project what the operator of a VOW may or may not seek to charge in a commission sense, the Competition Bureau ignored that full - blown VOW's were not just office sites in terms of the scale of their business, (others continue to make this same mistake) and that consequently before a VOW might even reach the point of «economies of scale», the additional costs associated with running a full - blown VOW would need to be satisfied.
You can not reject scientific reasoning (evolution, big bang, whatever you find annoying) and then attempt to use that same method of reasoning (logical reasoning, that is) to make any point.
But the point isn't to make everyone the same.
@Vic, And that's all very nice (and according to the rules that «God» supposedly made compeltely possible as this universe does not allow one thing to be two things or two things to occupy the same space, but that's not really teh point here), but you didn't answer my question.
It's to the point with some Christian posters here that any criticism of their actions and religious beliefs garners the immediate judgment that the person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible observation made by Jesus.
Of course, if Israel were the only country in the world where we send either 1) direct aid and / or 2) provide a military presence and which had free universal health care and / or free or low cost secondary education, you might actually be making a point about there being something unique in the US / Israeli relationship, as opposed to, the $ 100s of billions we're sending around the world to hundreds of other countries which provide the same benefits.
Well, it goes back to the same question: Since both sides and their fans all generally pray to the same God for victory, is making an obvious point of thanking God for favoring your team because of your better performance just rubbing it in, thus const.ituting poor sportsmanship?
yawn... of course we all have subjective biases... i'm honest about mine... and really, what is the point of having the samed tired debates here... you already have your opinion made up, won't truly listen and will hear anything i say through that lens
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?
The same point can be made in terms more familiar to the Whiteheadian tradition.
Churches are made up of people — all of them broken... I imagine that you will encounter the same people in your anti-institution that you would find at church... What's the point?
Jorge Nobo seems to be making much the same point in the following passage from Whitehead's Metaphysics of Extention and Solidarity: «the state of the universe from which C [a given actual occasion] springs — i.e., the state of the universe which gives birth to C — is both outside and inside C.
So I was not making any speculations, I was pointing out that if what you say is true, then anyone and everyone would be coming to the same conclusion about the same creator, instead you get 41,000 different flavors of one brand along with tens of thousand of other brands.
It seems to me that the statement many have made that we all worship the same God is not really on point for the issue.
(PK, 385 emphasis original) Fr Holloway makes the same point as follows: «Environment may favour or may destroy the life mechanism... but an intrinsic modification of pattern - of - being from the invisible cell to the primates is something quite beyond that.»
Fr Holloway makes the same point: «Scientific Positivism has no criterion of intellectual and moral values, because these are not subject to experimental analysis and verification.»
But the same point can be made in terms of economic and political systems.
MyMainMan, one other point I'd like to make: If you're going to support Sagan's claim that athiests must presume to have much more knowledge than the rest of us, then the exact same must apply to Theists (those who believe in God).
Obviously it is much more difficult for us to imagine the first appearance of reflective thought at some point in the history of a phylum or race made up of different individuals than at some point in the series of states making up the life of one and the same embryo.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z