The Paris agreement to cut anthropogenic CO2 emissions is based on
the same precautionary principle declarated in the Rio conference — agreeing even with the the unworking CO2 cuts made in accordance with the Kyoto protocol.
Not exact matches
Precautionary allergen labelling: The VITAL Program was developed to provide a standardised science - based risk assessment for voluntary cross contact allergen labelling and it may be appropriate to apply the
same principles to the presence of allergens due to agricultural co-mingling in the absence of any mandatory requirements.
I see using a long - tail risk basis as the
same as applying the
precautionary principle: It's a risk that can not be risked.
Residents at risk need merely make the
same arguments as the climate alarmists re: the
precautionary principle and «fairness» — with «geographical» rather than «generational» arguments (that is: «your neighbor's lives will be ruined» rather than «your children's lives will be ruined»)
I find it odd that changes in banker regulation, or
same - sex partnerships, or assessing childhood education are never based on the «
precautionary principle»; that is, any change to a complex system may have unintended negative impacts that far outweigh any benefits.
At the
same time, the
precautionary principle's acceptance is pushed for a 100 - year computer - modeled forecast.
At the
same time, USTR is expected to push for provisions in the agreement that encourage patents on human, plant and animal genes and use of cost - benefit analysis rather than the
precautionary principle when setting environmental regulatory standards.
Strikingly, the
precautionary principle also raises it's head, and probably for the
same reason it shows up in climate science: action — drug use — is urged with great frequency despite the fact that our understanding of the situation — in this case various chronic diseases and how to deal with them, is often quite incomplete.
That
same year, the city and county of San Francisco began the process of adopting the
precautionary principle, which it did in 2003.
It is
same ol'
same ol'
precautionary principle... we can't demonstrate but it might be so we must act.