Sentences with phrase «same quality about»

There's something about Animal Crossing's acoustic soundtrack or the spectacular over the top emotes that always makes me enjoy my time with titles in the series and, ultimately, AC: Pocket Camp, has this same quality about it.

You'll discover the same qualities about our mirrors — we believe they are an opportunity to reflect your unique style and have the power to slide sophistication across your home.

Not exact matches

There's a seductive quality about them, perhaps because they connect people to the outdoors in the same way skylights do in homes.

The fascinating thing about Quiznos is that it always had better quality ingredients than Subway, but it never had nearly the same success.

To evaluate the quality of your 401 (k) plan compared with plans at other companies of about the same size, check out Brightscope.

With the help of knowledge we can enhance our abilities and qualities and at the same time we increase our amount of knowledge and information about the surroundings of the world and society.

At the same time, without a sizable improvement in the efficiency of our health - care system, real health - care spending is set to increase at 3.5 per cent a year, with about 1 per cent coming from technology - driven improvements in quality of care and 2.5 per cent a year from the direct effects of population aging.

On the accidental level, however, to say that Socrates is shrewd or homely, is not to attribute to him extrinsic qualities which cling to him in about the same way as his cloak.

The next saying, about giving what is holy to dogs and casting pearls before swine (Mt 7:6), has the same tone of popular wisdom and the same crisp, concise quality.

An entity either is or is not an event, and the same may be said about its being an individual or an aggregate, a quality at the lower level of abstractness or at the higher, or the extraordinary individual God.

In A Process Christology, David R. Griffin notes the same difficulties we have raised about these proposals: «They have not made use of the notion that the content of God's ideal aims for men varies... If this notion of Whitehead's is not used, the resulting Christology has a somewhat Pelagian quality, suggesting that Jesus» specialness is due solely to human initiative — if Jesus was God's decisive revelation, this did not result even partially from any special activity on God's part in any sense.

It's about the same quality as Budweiser.

Well at least Frankie has some endearing qualities, I hope you didn't say the same about old Ratzinger; he was one p!ss poor holy father.

If someone is thinking about doing the same, I would say do a lot of research on the quality of midwifery care in your area.

They found that most of the items typically tested for in coconut oil, such as free fatty acids, moisture levels, etc. were about the same in virgin coconut oils, although a few brands were lower in quality.

Just like in the post All About Vegan Protein, when I talk about quality over quantity, the same rule goes for carbohydrAbout Vegan Protein, when I talk about quality over quantity, the same rule goes for carbohydrabout quality over quantity, the same rule goes for carbohydrates.

A little about our sponsors: The iconic Kitchenaid stand mixer was born in 1919, from there stemmed an entire kitchen of high - performance appliances - all created with the same attention to detail and quality.

We have sourced barrels from the same distillery for about two years now, and have found their barrels to be of excellent quality; this is both from our internal inspection, as well as brewer feedback.

A little about our awesome sponsors: The iconic Kitchenaid stand mixer was born in 1919, from there stemmed an entire kitchen of high - performance appliances - all created with the same attention to detail and quality.

It is made from the best quality fruit and is naturally sweetened with Splenda, so you can enjoy the same delicious sweet flavor without having to worry about the calories.

This get back to an earlier article about Paolo Dybala and if we are interested, my point then is the same now, we can not rely on Giroud to be our only target man, we need another quality stiker and why not Dybala??

Now I am not a sports star by any means so I didn't have the same quality medical, but it took me about 18 months to get back to standard, and I still have problems today.

I like the player, he is young and he has potential.So good for Man Utd.Koeman said he has quality and it's a good signing for Man Utd.Wenger said that he likes the player but we had seven or eight players who played in the same position.we don't have to be bitter about, I am sure there will be two / three quality signings for Arsenal.

We didn't have the money to get quality players hence why we couldn't play the same football as teams like Barca, and don't be bringing up lies about how Mourinho would have won CL with Bendtner, Chamakh and Djourou.

I would most like to see you share your observations about the player you wished, how his qualities fit to our squad, and provide evidence on how said player can do a better job than another in the same role, so that everyone can debate on the same grounds.

We said the same about Spurs, the same against Liverpool, the same against stoke, even Villa at home did so but lack of quality let them down, they had 605 possession.

That is what he tried to do though, talking about the quality of the deliveries from the home team and suggesting that they have caused the same problems to all the EPL sides they have faced.

Sorry not sure if you got a hard time reading when did I say» i don't know what I'm talking about» and I'm not sure if you have a hard time with comprehension either but I said I'm not sure if he has the same quality he did a few years ago.

Arsenal needs to start fighting and making use of their quality at the same time or they should forget about winning the title anytime soon.

I think just about everyone is assuming that he will be in the same City dressing room as Bravo next season, but he is not allowed to reveal any details until the Gunners have secured a top quality signing to soften the blow of his departure.

Well written, but I think it will fall on deaf ears, my fear is as follows, it will take a loss in money for the manager and board to change, this will only come if we finish out of the top 4, but knowing the board they would still give home a season to try again, I feel very sorry for Sanchez, he is total quality and deserves better, most of the other players look settled, turn up give70 % and get paid, no matter what level you play at you should come off the pitch thinking I gave everything, how many of our players could say that, they lack motivation, player for player we are as good if not better than athletico Madrid but they have a manger that gets 100 % out of every player, Klopp is the same, but why would they leave their clubs to come here with a boar that cares about money not entertainment, Wenger was a lucky manager he inherited a top defence now his luck has run out

Talk is cheap, lets see it on the pitch He said the same about Sanogo, but his quality hasn't materialised as of yet.

People who say we do not need another dm know zero about football while coq has done a fantastic job he will not be able to play every game and of course is bound to pick up the odd injury flamini is simply not good enough to do the same job it is a must we sign another quality dm so we are covered in every position for every occasion for big games we could even play both and sacrifice one of the flair players although i doubt wenger will do that the options will be there sign a gk, dm and cf and we willbe serious tittle challengers next season.

I thought he was something special before he came to Watford.Before that I had never watched him but how Wenger followed him made me think he was something special.He's just not good at all.He's just an okay player.However we have many players with the same okay quality in our squad.The main thing that affects is poor mentality and poor managerial skills.It's really never been about the players even if many of them are average.

I really hope that Arsene Wenger's comments the other day about how hard it was to find good quality players available in the January transfer window, at the same time as praising the Arsenal left back Nacho Monreal on his ability to cover at the centre of defence does not mean that us fans are in for more frustration in the transfer market.

However, the same report does also contain a reason for Arsenal fans to worry about the transfer, as the paper reveals that the French champions PSG are still hoping to beat us to the signature of the quality stopper.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

total failure... Can you believe Wenger spent 32 millions on 2 average players (Chambers and Welbeck) and is penny pinching when is sbout real class players?What is in his mind?Pay a fortune in salary for mediocre players live Walcott, Ramsey and Wilshere and have hesitations about increasing Sanchez wages... keeping on books failures like Sanogo... The truth is - I say it for years and years - until the «British core» disapears, we are not going to be succesful.The low quality of British players is dragging the team back.Last time Arsenal was a powerhouse NONE of the first 11 was British.Wanna see how the British quality looks like in a football team - look no further than national sides of England, Scotland, N Ireland, Wales, even Ireland (not British but same style)- all mediocre teams «able» to be defeated by any team coming to mind.And you are asking about Chambers?He is in the same mold like Wilshere,Walcott,Ox,Ramsey,Gibs,Jenkinson - mediocre overpriced and overpaid players.The world is full with hungry, ambitious and skilled players living in poverty and dreaming of moving to the top at any cost or sacrifice (did you see the poor house - if you can call that house, looking more like an old tent - in which Alexis Sanchez grew up?Or Suarez?)

Because he is clearly an improvement over Walcott and Gnabry and you know Ox case with injuries... the same way we signed Ozil when we have Cazorla (even better than Ozil in my eyes) and other CAM's... It is about signing quality players when they are available... that being said we should never forget about the urgent need for clear ST

why arsenal keep it so late because we need two players a striker and a cdm in the end we will buy a striker at the last moment and fans will forget about the cover cdm or someone better than coquelin.we will think at least we got the striker in the end.And the board will be happy that they won't need to get two quality players in the same window.

it's not about the bodies (quantity) it's about the quality... same mistake we made at the start of the season in midfield.

And if the difference is night and day then why the reported reticence of Mou to sell us Cech — if we weren't close or at least in the same ball - park as them quality wise then why the hell fret about it?

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

But they talk about the same top qualities when they want to keep the player!

He is not a quality striker because he makes a lot of mistakes in his game.The fact that he scores 20 goals does not mean he is a quality back up striker.It is one thing to be a goal scorer and another thing to be a good or average player.Goal scoring is a very important aspect of a player but not the only aspect.Trust me you can score 20 goals in all competitions and still be average.If Chamakh, Gervinho and all the so called flops scored this same goals they would still have been considered not good enough for Arsenal.His game is just not good enough and I for one believe even if no one believes that we can get a backup striker who is better than him and also a top centre forward.Its all about mentality and willingness.Forget his goals and look at his game or else you'll force me to bring up strikers in the world who have scored his same goals and are even considered terrible.

At all levels, regardless of the amount of playing time, players receive the same quality instruction from coaches who care about development and foster a positive, sportsmanlike environment.

wenger should consider draxler or pedro (who i personally think would be value for money replacement and gives you the same qualities as corzola and at 27 would be around for his peak) if you sell corzola for # 10 - 12 million then pedro only cost about # 10 million once you take off the selling funds that's a bargain for a quality replacement, draxler would be a more expensive and long term replacement.

I could moan about several performances from today, but my issue is with the same few who continue to show they're not the requisite quality... gaffer included sadly.

«The reason why Man City is willing to pay those high prices is because most of them are top quality players, now you can not say the same about the average players at our club sitting on high wages because they are not top quality and don't deserve it.»

It's because they know that other than Aguero there's no one else that would have the quality they search for, which is the same quality Wenger talks about.