«Court weighs jury - selection survey lawsuit»: The Providence Journal today contains an article that begins, «The Providence Journal yesterday told the Rhode Island Supreme Court that the public should be able to see written questions during jury selection just as if
the same questions had been asked out loud in open court.»
He wouldn't have been so restrained if
the same question had been asked again this week.
These are the same questions I've been asking for three months.
Not exact matches
All
were between the ages of 13 and 96, and all
were asked the
same standard
question on general happiness: «
Would you say that you
are very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy?»»
Ask this
question to an early or mid-career professional —
Would you rather spend the next six years at one job or two years at three different jobs if the income
is the
same?
Smart entrepreneurs
are hungry for advice from those who
have gone before them, because they realize that by
asking the right
questions they might avoid making the
same mistakes.
It
's just that you might get easily frustrated that they don't
have your
same sense of jumping in, taking action, and
asking questions later.
Other investors, it turned out,
were asking the
same question and began talking to others they knew who
had put in money.
One of my greatest pet peeves
is when a salesperson
asks me a
question, and I know they
are going to
have the
same response no matter what I say.
A: If you
were to
have asked me this
question at any time over the past five years, I
would have started with the
same answer: mobile.
When
asked to estimate how much someone
would get done in 20 hours, the IT pros predicted a hypothetical developer
would be much more productive per hour than when they
were asked the
same question about a 100 - hour period.
«If you
were in the
same office you
'd go over and
ask someone a
question,» Young says.
Then I
ask them another
question; if I could grow it faster in that
same time period with more capital, what
would that number
be and what dilution
are they willing to take for that?
After the Facebook data controversy, there
was speculation that it
would only
be a matter of time before Google started
being asked the
same questions.
My
question to the Alberta Government
is the
same as I
would ask about a feed - in tariff — why 2 credits?
We
are about halfway through 2017, and that
's usually when a lot of
would -
be home buyers start
asking the
same question.
Each age group
was asked the
same question, «By your best estimate, how much money do you
have saved for retirement?»
In fact, up until very recently governance researchers
have not
asked any sort of
questions about the extent to which the governance realities of family firms
are the
same or different from their counterparts.
It
's the old story,
same question I
'd ask the Nuns at school «Who
was Gods Mother?»
I
've asked some of them this
same question and their response for the most part
has just
been avoidance... they get a bit uncomfortable and just kinda sweep it under the rug.
Why do you continue to
ask the
same question when you
have been given the answer?
But anyway, I myself struggle with the
same question you
asked about pastors who know and embrace the full implications of Calvinism, and I
have to say I DO regard a pastor like that as one who teaches False Doctrine and who
is dangerous because of it.
The priest can and should do the
same: challenge and
ask questions of people which, if anyone else
asked them,
would probably
be told to mind their own business.
It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it
was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires more from me than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick people and crazy people, homeless people and hopeless people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered
questions with more
questions, and demands for proof with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each person differently and saved each person differently; a Jesus who
had no list of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who
was «in» and who
was «out»; a Jesus who loved after
being betrayed, healed after
being hurt, and forgave while
being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who
asked his disciples to do the
same...
If you
were to
ask the
same question today, that answer
would more likely
be a young Nigerian mother on the outskirts of Lagos, a university student in Seoul, South Korea, or a teenage boy in Mexico City.
Having spent the last ten years wrestling through some tough
questions related to faith, heaven, hell, and salvation, I really appreciate the personal way in which Bell frames the conversation,
asking the very
questions I
was so afraid to
ask all those years and proclaiming the
same hope I only dared believe — that God doesn't give up on people, that he
is ever - loving, ever - redeeming, ever pursuing.
He surely can not seriously imagine that men of similar intellectual caliber to his own
have not
asked the
same searching fundamental
questions about life and its meaning which he himself
asks, and yet
have come to the conclusion that the Christian Faith
is an indispensable part of total truth.
Perhaps the hardest lesson I
've had to learn as I
've raised
questions about Bible - Belt Christianity
is that no amount of passion or persuasion can convince others to
ask the
same questions.
I
asked a
question of this poster that
was very much like the one myweight posed to L4H and unshockingly got pretty much the
same response... «oh, well, define murder and you
have to put it in perspective».
One young woman
asked me this
question with tears streaming down her face, for she
had been made to feel small and worthless by churches like these, and she lived in fear that thousands upon thousands of women
were experiencing the
same thing and there
was nothing she could do to stop it.
This understanding of God's relationship to the world
has been enormously influential in contemporary philosophy of religion, especially since the publication in 1948 of The Divine Relativity from which the above quotation
was taken.2 Although the consistency of divine relativity with the understanding of simultaneity in modem physics
is a recognized point of contention, the
question I wish to
ask is whether the theory of divine relativity
is metaphysically possible.3 How could it
be possible for God to know and feel the different experiences of radically distinct subjects with equal vividness all at the
same time?
The
question you
have asked is one of the most fundamental
questions that can
be asked, and yet at the
same time, a
question which never seems to get answered.
You know, you could
have asked that
same question any time during the last TWO THOUSAND YEARS, during each and every one of which someone somewhere
was predicting that THIS
would be the year Jesus finally put in his long - awaited reappearance.
Brightman seems to recognize that this
is a stretch for him, for when he
asks of himself the
same question after his correspondence with Hartshorne
has ceased, Brightman expresses epistemological diffidence, counterbalanced only by a peculiar attitude of Scriptural faith:
After eight years of doing this and now dealing with two teenagers living under my very own roof who
ask the
same question, I
've got the answers down pat and can dismiss my students at the bell confident that they
have at least a hazy sense that maybe going to church next Sunday wouldn't
be a complete waste of their time.
Beside I feel that the
same descriptions might
be required to
be asked or
be questioned to Muslims of Different Doctrines, Races and Cultures, who might
have among them that who
are similar to your nations, such as those who
are Atheists, Agnostics or even Satanic but there still will
be those who
are considered as religious believers «Moderate or Extremes»..!
Nobody
has ever
been able to justify this barbarism, and when you
ask them about it, they always completely avoid the
question by spewing the
same tired bumper stickers you used.
I
would just like to see one moderator
ask Mitt this
question; «Does the LDS Church believe that the Jesus Christ of the LDS Church
is the
same Jesus referenced in the Bible?
I
ask not facetiously or rhetorically (assuming a right answer), but because I
've been faced with the
same question ad nauseum.
I
'd ask the
same question of so called «christian conservatives» and their view point of how less fortunate folks should
be treated.
The U.S. Supreme Court
has not
been asked - nor could it possibly answer - the
question of what God or the Bible thinks about
same - sex marriage.
I used to believe the exact
same way... then I started to
ask the
question, «If God
is unchangeable, then why
would he change?»
He
asked his students the
same question that he
had asked us so many years later: do you believe what you
are saying?
Going back to the major political contests of 2009, beginning with the Governors» races in Virginia and New Jersey and to the Senate race in Massachusetts, the electorate
has been asked the
same question about Obama's agenda and
has given the
same response.
It wasn't until I began speaking with a Messianic Rabbi and
asking him some of these
same questions that I
would hear, «In Yeshua's time that phrase meant...» I began getting answers!
its a story that
has been with us since we started talking and
asking questions... however, the time
has come since we can now answer many of the very
same questions that required a god in the past with science, a bigger
question arises...
are people truly this willing and wanting to replace reality proven by testible science with a fantasy?
The pope also
asks the provocative
question: «
Is not this same attachment at the heart of what I have called a «dialogue of conversions Is it not precisely this dialogue which clearly shows the need for an ever more profound experience of the truth if full communion is to be attained?&raqu
Is not this
same attachment at the heart of what I
have called a «dialogue of conversions
Is it not precisely this dialogue which clearly shows the need for an ever more profound experience of the truth if full communion is to be attained?&raqu
Is it not precisely this dialogue which clearly shows the need for an ever more profound experience of the truth if full communion
is to be attained?&raqu
is to
be attained?»
After all, if the sole foundation of your relationship
is that the two of you like the
same movies, you
've probably got some tough
questions to
ask yourselves.
If that woman
was sitting at my kitchen table with my wife and I, and
asked that
same question, I imagine there
would be lots of tears and hugs, and not much else.
Today the
question would not
be asked in the
same terms, and the ancient answer, framed in the concepts of contemporary philosophy,
is of little direct help to us.