If fossil fuel emissions were rapidly curbed, the new t - shirt would only have
the same radiocarbon age as something 100 years old, according to the study.
Not exact matches
Just because
radiocarbon dating has flaws does not mean the dozen other methods for dating objects are automatically bogus which is why the scientific community believes the 4.5 billion year
age of the earth, it's because they did not use just a single method of testing to estimate that
age, they used several different methods which all confirmed the
same approximate
age.
A cotton T - shirt manufactured and tested in 2050 may appear to be the
same age as an artifact from the 11th century when dated using the
radiocarbon method.
For instance,
radiocarbon dating determines the
age of biological remains based on the ratio between the carbon isotopes (atoms of the
same element with different numbers of neutrons) carbon - 12 and carbon - 14 it holds - this proportion changes as radioactive carbon - 14 breaks down while stable carbon - 12 does not.
If not, I'm afraid I don't understand this graph... it seems to me that «
radiocarbon age» and «Years BP / 1950» are suppose to be two different ways of saying the
same thing: how old the samples are.