I suspect that he'e playing for
the same reduced salary that he agreed to a year ago, which is $ 2 million, plus or minus $ 500,000.
Not exact matches
Even when they are told that «
reducing average class sizes by three students would cost roughly the
same amount as increasing teacher
salaries by $ 10,000,» 44 percent of Americans select class - size reduction, whereas 28 percent select increasing teacher
salaries.
Class Size Reduction Question:
Reducing average class sizes by 3 students would cost roughly the
same amount as increasing teacher
salaries by $ 10,000.
Providing information on current teacher
salaries in their state
reduces support for
salary increases among independents to 34 percent — exactly the
same as among Republicans.
One group of survey respondents, randomly chosen, was told, «
Reducing average class sizes by three students would cost roughly the
same amount as increasing teacher
salaries by 13 % or buying $ 10,000 in new books and technologies for each class every year.»
Along the
same lines, parents (53 %) are also more likely than the public (46 %) to think money should be spent on
reducing class size rather than increasing teacher
salaries or buying new books and technologies — unless they are told the relative cost of each policy.
They have already voted no to across the board teacher
salary increases and continued the freeze on teachers»
salaries that has been in place for 5 years (at the
same time passed a tax break for the wealthy, and now, with
reduced revenue can not give raises), increased class size, taken away additional pay for Masters degrees, eliminated most of the state's teacher assistants, gone after tenure and offered the top 25 % of the teachers in a district $ 500 to give up their tenure immediately, increased the number of charter schools (many funded by Republicans in the private school business) and finally, the most recent scheme pondered is to let kids go to any school in the state regardless of their home county.
If class size is
reduced from 28 to 27, or even to 25, you still must retain the teacher and her
salary remains the
same.
While this brief focuses on Act 10's impact on Wisconsin teachers based on the data available, the
same forces driving changes in the teaching workforce can also affect the broader public sector.3 Proponents of Act 10 insisted that
reducing collective bargaining rights for teachers would improve education by eliminating job protections such as tenure and seniority - based
salary increases.
The final budget bill cut state K - 12 spending by nearly $ 800 million, over7 percent — the largest amount in Wisconsin's history — and limited local governments» abilities to make up for these cuts through property taxes.14 That
same year, Gov. Walker passed major tax cuts primarily targeted toward corporations and the wealthy that totaled $ 2.33 billion over 10 years.15 Gov. Walker and Act 10 proponents argued that the bill's reforms would allow schools to offset these cuts by
reducing teachers» benefits and hiring lower - paid teachers, preventing budget cuts from affecting students.16 Gov. Walker also argued that eliminating requirements to bargain over
salary structures, hiring, and working conditions would give schools additional flexibility needed to attract and retain higher - quality teachers.17
Either you pay from your own pocket and then you get income tax relief on the payment, i.e. your gross
salary is
reduced by the gross pension contribution and income tax is recalculated with the excess either refunded to you or put in your pension (the details are a bit more complicated depending on your marginal tax rate, but the end result is the
same).
To attract and retain these great attorneys — and do so through a model that greatly
reduced client fees — we built the firm on a model that permits these attorneys to work from a position that support their life balance and from locations not possible in traditional practice settings and, at the
same time, strips away overhead and fixed
salaries that underpin a very large part of a traditional law firm's fee structure.
Reduce firm
salaries and billable hours requirements by half, across the board, while at the
same time doubling
salaries for public defenders, legal aid attorneys, non-profit attorneys and all other «public interest» practitioners.
You can keep your insurance cover intact (
same) even after you stop working or your
salary gets
reduced.
If employers pay the payroll tax and
reduce employees»
salaries by the
same amount, workers wouldn't have to deduct anything and would wind up being paid the
same amount.