Sentences with phrase «same religious views»

When I joined this site I have met many people sharing the same faith with me and having the same religious views.

Examples of positive deal breakers we've heard before might be people who smoke, people without life goals, people who don't want kids, people that work in a certain field, people that don't have the same religious views as you, etc..

If you don't want to find yourself in a relationship with a person of another faith, then it would be wiser to date people who have the same religious views even at the casual level.

Exit polls said that «same religious views» trumped, «can beat Obama».

Accepting the divine entry of God into human history through the man Jesus Christ explains the extraordinary strength and resilience of the Christian Church, and also why it is a mistake to regard it as a purely human organization of those who happen to share the same religious views.

Not exact matches

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

I don't feel the need to cater to the religiously naive and uneducated by acting like there's a difference especially when these same religious folk would surely deem a person of an opposing religion / view that heard voices crazy.

At last someone that holds the same views about those crazy religious freaks trying to turn all of us into a bunch of bible preaching zombies that pray and send money to something NO ONE has ever seen.

After seeing the self - serving policies that Romney and the GOP have adopted, there is no way I could vote for someone who aspouses such views — even if they subscribe to my same religious beliefs.

the only thing i can sum up from all your views is that you dismiss calvinism for its political incorrectness and note in the same fashion Jesus was dismissed by religious leaders of His days.

Were religious people promoting peace when they voted down gay marriage (a civil rights issue, opponents of which will be viewed in the same light as the opponents against civil rights in the 50s and 60s) You are just so comfortable in the majority, you can't see the prejudice and bias you put on people that aren't like you.

If Israel views itself as caretaker of the land — its divine mission, in Buber's view — whose owner always makes space for those who need it (for those who choose to live with the same inclusive spirit), the religious precept of imitatio dei would require us as Jews to share that space, even the holy city of Jerusalem, to make it a «divine place» — the place «God intended to have made of it.»

Yep, no less annoying than the religious who have to interject their views everywhere that I'm sure he is ready to condemn... Two sides of the same coin.

JTA: Hollande Meets With Chief Rabbi on Gay Marriage President Francois Hollande met with local religious leaders, including the country's chief rabbi, Gilles Bernheim, to hear their views on same - sex marriages.

In fact, I see the decision as a victory for religious freedom in the sense that people whose religion supports and encourages same - sex unions will no longer be prohibited from practicing that important religious value simply because some of their neighbors hold a different view.

Really, the problem really is about semantics and the conceptualization of something in the light of cultural (i.e. religious) views that we grow with; in reality, we are thinking about the same, just modeling differently.

You've got to give as much airtime to conservative views as liberal ones, equal time in debate to secular and religious views, the same column width to progressive and traditional opinion.

Religion is dying, and within a few generations I believe ANY religious group will be viewed in the same way we view witches today.

Nevertheless, this country is too big and too diverse to seriously expect that everyone walks the same path regarding spirituality, and it's completely reasonable to understand how and why our nation's President or Presidential candidates would not necessarily share our religious views, but still be capable of being great leaders.

Printing ushered in the Reformation and with it religious plurality and the differentiation of consciousness reflecting competing and conflicting classes and other interests (all struggling for the right to tell stories from their own points of view) in the same society.

We believe that there are many Christians whose moral inclinations might persuade them to take the same view of current problems as our own, except for the fact that they are inhibited by religious presuppositions that they regard as more «purely» Christian than those represented by the consensus of the Church through all the ages.

«1) The Religious Right, which seems to think all evangelicals have the same political views; 2) The Neo-Reformed, who think Calvinism is the only faithful form of evangelicalism; and 3) The Political Progressives, who like the Religious Right think the faithful form of evangelicalism will be politically progressive.»

If I have to read your religious signs when I drive down the road, and I live in So FL, so I see them ALL the time, then it's only fair that we have the same opportunity to voice our views.

It is important to remember that non-relating or conflict in the spiritual area frequently occurs even between spouses from the same religious tradition, but who have basically different value systems and world - views derived from their respective families - of - origin.

Nor would it be difficult to show that the mainline churches, Protestant and Catholic, that have provided the religious framework for the traditional morality, are in disarray, have declining income and attendance, and themselves are the objects of the same suspicion with which all established institutions are viewed.

But it is completely wrong that anyone (or business) should be exempt from following the same rules as the rest simply because the rules don't jibe with their religious views.

Mayan ludicrousness is exactly the same as any religious view!

At the same time, I know» and this was evident again at the RNA convention» how many reporters are devoutly religious (notably evangelical Protestant and Catholic), view their work as a vocation, genuinely want to be fair, and worry about purchasing journalistic plaudits at the price of truth.

At the same time interfaith organizations, often initially viewed with suspicion by religious leaders, have encouraged people of different religions to meet and get to know each other, in the hope that they can work together for peace and to uphold moral values.

To all the non-religious fundamentalists: The same «utter simplicity» that makes religious fundamentalists incoherent in their world view makes you incoherent in yours.

They want «In God We Trust» on our money (1954), they want evolution banned from schools while allowing a REVISED pledge of allegiance that originally did not include the phrase «under God», they want laws that reflect Christian morality (Abortion, same s3x marriage, etc.), and they treat as outcasts anyone who doesn't align with their particular religious view.

Cardinal Camillo Ruini, the pope's vicar for Rome, it is said, is one of those who hold this view: what is needed, he is thought to believe, is (in the words of John Allen Jr of the American National Catholic Reporter) «good relations with Islam, but also a more robust capacity to challenge and critique Islamic leaders, especially on issues of «reciprocity» — the idea that if Muslim immigrants benefit from religious freedom in the West, Christians should get the same treatment in Islamic states.»

Other religious traditions can legitimately take the same reciprocal view of their own religious aim: it is real and supreme, but it can be realized only by those who accept it as so.

future civilizations will study our society after it crumbles, and our policy shaping, thought controlling religious views will be lumped into the same category as the ancient greek myths, norse gods, and native american shamanism.

Many Americans continue to say their religious beliefs have been influential in shaping their views about social issues, including abortion and same - sex marriage, according to Pew research, but it doesn't always translate into votes.

«We will be seeking legal guarantees of the same freedom of conscience for our constituents and religious organisations to teach, preach and express a traditional view of marriage.»

So, we wear clothes not just to keep us warm, but also for the very same reason why some Muslim women wear the burka (from an atheist point of view, the religious reasons should be interpreted as social reasons) and our laws mandate that you have to wear clothes for exactly that reason.

Regardless of a scientist's view on their origin, they say, discovering the laws of nature requires the same scientific methods and techniques whether the researcher is a devout religious believer or an atheist.

Why not broaden the limits and meet more single people sharing the same faith and religious views with you?

When it comes to dating and finding a mate, it becomes that much more important that we find someone who matches up with our religious views and can embody these same traits that we hold dear.

While Tinder serves the general dating market, some sites and apps prefer to focus on a certain segment of the market with particular tastes — whether it's dating people who have the same political beliefs, eating habits, or religious views, for instance.

Participants will gain an understanding of the latest developments in state and federal law on complex issues, such as: Transgender Students: issues related to student dress code, the right to participate in school activities and events, access to school facilities such as locker rooms and restrooms; School Climate: the obligation to proactively address school climate and promote a school climate accepting of all students, regardless of sexual orientation; Religious Issues: the rights of students and staff to express moral and religious views regarding sexual orientation and identity both during school and outside of school; Employment Issues: the implications of recent developments regarding same sex marriage and the rights of same sex couples to access employee benefits; and Discrimination Issues: the rights and obligations to address issues of employment discrimination and retReligious Issues: the rights of students and staff to express moral and religious views regarding sexual orientation and identity both during school and outside of school; Employment Issues: the implications of recent developments regarding same sex marriage and the rights of same sex couples to access employee benefits; and Discrimination Issues: the rights and obligations to address issues of employment discrimination and retreligious views regarding sexual orientation and identity both during school and outside of school; Employment Issues: the implications of recent developments regarding same sex marriage and the rights of same sex couples to access employee benefits; and Discrimination Issues: the rights and obligations to address issues of employment discrimination and retaliation.

While the use of grape juice and wine certainly references religious ritual, this same rigid devotion extends to the viewing experience.

If I'm a good judge of character and there is no diversity from one character to the next, they all have the same political opinions and religious views, wouldn't that make me a bad judge of character, scientifically speaking?

The court saw the inherent problems with the statute and its application, and held that «Vermont's ban on religious messages in practice operates not to restrict speech to certain subjects but instead to distinguish between those who seek to express secular and religious views on the same subjects.»

For the present, CPA 2004 shields religious hierarchies from the embarrassing discovery that not all congregations share their negative view of same - sex relations.

Second, it's also worth noting that the 2004 SCC reference on same sex marriage provides some helpful guidance on how the Court views the interplay of religous freedom with same - sex marriage, concluding that given the protections afforded to religous institutions under the Charter and provincial human rights laws, that it would be unlikely that religious institutions would be compelled to recognize gay marriage — a point that seems entirely consistent with the 2001 TWU decision.

In addition, on a religious point of view... if you provide an essential service to the community because you feel it is your Christian duty to do so, you should not be looking at people's beliefs when you provide these services, or who you employ to provide these services as long as they do it with the right intention and with the same mission.