The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples also speaks to the rights of Indigenous peoples, like all other peoples to enjoy
the same rights to life, liberty and security.
The meaning is that every human being has
the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Assuming all humans have
the same right to live, one could agree that all countries have the right to sell CO2 emission certificates according to the number of citizens and to distribute the produced income equally among their citizens.
Not exact matches
I met a married couple recently who
live in the
same house but have completely separate
lives,
right down
to different bedrooms.
And at the
same time, Melissa and all the writers — a lot of which are female — absolutely have every
right in the world
to take that material and go there, because that's the world that they
live in.
And if
living in a county that values human
rights and diversity is important to you, you should know that Panama recently confirmed its plans to comply with a landmark Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruling that recognizes same - sex marriage and transgender r
rights and diversity is important
to you, you should know that Panama recently confirmed its plans
to comply with a landmark Inter-American Court of Human
Rights ruling that recognizes same - sex marriage and transgender r
Rights ruling that recognizes
same - sex marriage and transgender
rightsrights.
Elizabeth Chyrum, Director of Human
Rights Concern - Eritrea (HRC - E) said: «It is an insult that the legitimate patriarch of the Orthodox Church is confined
to the servants» quarters in the
same compound where two junior bishops
live in a villa.
As far as the donating goes, if they want
to donate
to a church organization then that's fine but
to donate
to groups that stand against my
right to live free and have the
same rights as everyone else is this god for sacking country then that's just wrong.
And it's when these
same folks try
to use their beliefs
to discriminate against others, slow scientific progress, and dictate how others run their
lives that I have every
right to refuse
to allow it.
I
live in America, where, as you say, everyone has the
right to believe or not believe and, as you don't say, where everyone has the
same freedom of speech.
She also explains she believes Palestinians must be «free from military occupation» and «have an equally valid
right to live in the land and should have the
same civil
rights that are afforded
to Israeli Jewish citizens, whether that's in one state, two states, or however many states.»
To deny
same gender
life - partnerships these
rights because some people find the thought of gay marriage icky or offensive is discrimination, pure and simple.
To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fatherin
To hold that
same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental
right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fatherin
to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you
life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.
the
right to fleece people of their
life savings, then have those
same people tell others how holy you are?
The church tries
to get around the issue by attempting
to somehow separate the individual from who they are and thereby maintain the
right to openly condemn them and / or seek
to impose a
life of celibacy and deny them the
same rights of love, marriage, and family they themselves enjoy.
Right now it's hard
to imagine a Resurrection Sunday around the corner, but I suppose that if the
same spirit that raised Christ from the dead
lives in us today, anything is possible.
This country was founded on the presumption that you can
live your
life however you want
to live it insofar as you do not impinge upon other folks»
right to do the
same.
You don't want someone else
to tell you how
to live yours, but you're
right there doing the
same with someone else.
Living in a pluralistic society that also grants freedom and civil
rights protection
to those with whom one disagrees is not the
same as religious persecution.
too true; you're
right, we are holistic people in a holistic world
living holistic
lives and political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many others are all so inextricably intertwined with each other that it may be better
to think of them as different views of the
same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)
c. And as for your male and female slaves whom you may have; from the nations that are around you, from them you may buy male and female slaves: Foreign slaves among the Jews did not have the
same rights as Hebrew slaves sold into servitude because of debt; they could be held as slaves for
life, though they had
to be treated humanely (Exodus 20:8 - 11; 21:20 - 21).
Regardless of mine, yours, offended dissenters, or anyones beliefs we as Americans including Mr. Cathy, have the
right to EXPRESS our beliefs and
to live our own lifestyles provided that they DO NOT infringe on the
same rights of others
to do
same.
Attorney Diane Coleman, president of the disabilities
rights group Not Dead Yet, demonstrates how the
same society that can not be bothered
to provide the necessary assistance
to enhance the
lives of disabled people seems
to jump
to support any disabled person's request for assisted suicide.
Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited
to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms
to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring
to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence
to expand his dominion so does God use violence
to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our
lives that very
same battle is still happening
right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according
to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able
to influence us if we are in Christ.
Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is
right, so many out there are preaching you can
live any way you want and be
right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son
to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are
to obey his commandments, not break them, we are
to live a righteous and holy
life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we
live in will not
to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go
to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are
living the
same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard
to do these things let alone
live and do them everyday, i would be afraid
to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be
right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer
to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,
Funny you got that
right, I fell into the
same t - rap... but got
to live with my destiny having four kids togather... women were and are Hard Es - sential luxury that men of Adam... had
to pay the dues for it gladly... That is
Life and Women were created
to be the Sp - ice of
Life for men whether positively or negatively depends on our cultivation of the tilth...!
To fail to be one's true human self is to fail in maintaining on one's part the right relationship with God in the divine intention for mankind and at the same moment a failure in right relationships with other men and women and children, characterized as it should be by the caring, sharing, giving, and receiving which brings about a condition of peace and concord — which is shalom or abundance of lif
To fail
to be one's true human self is to fail in maintaining on one's part the right relationship with God in the divine intention for mankind and at the same moment a failure in right relationships with other men and women and children, characterized as it should be by the caring, sharing, giving, and receiving which brings about a condition of peace and concord — which is shalom or abundance of lif
to be one's true human self is
to fail in maintaining on one's part the right relationship with God in the divine intention for mankind and at the same moment a failure in right relationships with other men and women and children, characterized as it should be by the caring, sharing, giving, and receiving which brings about a condition of peace and concord — which is shalom or abundance of lif
to fail in maintaining on one's part the
right relationship with God in the divine intention for mankind and at the
same moment a failure in
right relationships with other men and women and children, characterized as it should be by the caring, sharing, giving, and receiving which brings about a condition of peace and concord — which is shalom or abundance of
life.
O when one beholds a man who protests that he has entirely understood how Christ went about in the form of a lowly servant, poor, despised, and, as the Scripture says, spat upon — when I see the
same man so careful
to betake himself thither where in a worldly sense it is good
to be, and accommodate himself there in the utmost security, when I see him apprehensive of every puff of wind from
right or left, as though his
life depended upon it, and so blissful, so utterly blissful, so awfully glad — yes,
to make the thing complete, so awfully glad that he is able
to thank God for it — glad that he is held in honor by all men — then I have often said
to myself and by myself, «Socrates, Socrates, Socrates, can it be possible that this man has understood what he says he has understood?»
The report adds that the church should pay «special attention
to the children who
live with couples of the
same sex, emphasizing that the needs and
rights of the little ones must always be given priority.»
The NATO essay points again
to the fact that, whether the issue under discussion is welfare policy or foreign policy, what we consistently find in the work of Irving Kristol is a consideration of public
life and governing from the standpoint of the individual soul» and, by the
same token, a consideration of the need
to foster the
right kinds of virtues in individual souls in order for the most desirable regimes
to be successful.
They maintain that
same - sex couples can
live in a committed relationship and have a
right to express their affection for one another genitally.
Since Roe v Wade, pro-life advocates have argued that an unborn child is unarguably human, and therefore deserves of the
same constitutional
right as you and I enjoy — namely, the
right to live.
-- As private individuals, we are responsible for seeking our interest in harmony with, and not at the expense of, the interest and well - being of others; responsible for condemning and averting all forms of killing and violence; and responsible for respecting the
right to life and development of all people and all
living things on Earth, next door
to us the
same as on distant continents.
Quite frankly, I don't care how people spend their time, as long as they permit me the
same freedom
to do with my
life and my time what I choose and enjoy, and as long as their leisure pursuits aren't infringing on anyone else's
rights.
If the point of religion is
to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the
SAME way (i.e. does
right unto their neighbors,
lives according
to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?
As long as it helps improve your
life I could care less what you believe as long as you can accept we don't all have
to believe the
same, and you do not try and take away my
right to believe as I wish.
Tim i found it liberating
to just do what the Lord wants you
to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is
to do what the Lord wants me
to do.There have been times i have said no
to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not
to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have
to be in the
right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is
right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy
to be an encouragement
to others in the worship team i havent wanted
to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem
to be changing at the
same time i am aware that i do nt
to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used
to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my
life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do
to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked
to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked
to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning
to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has
to be
right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory
to him.May the Lord continue
to show you what he wants you
to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you
to know that you do nt have
to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations
to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz
«O God, who didst teach the hearts of Thy faithful people by sending
to them the light of Thy Holy Spirit: Grant us by the
same Spirit
to have a
right judgment in all things, and evermore
to rejoice in His holy comfort...» This is great rhetoric because it roots the
life of the moment in the grace of the past; it evokes a response in depth because it is not only a report, but a reverberation.
The
Right has no worry as
to what devastation their policies will cause... their money insulates them from crisis, from illness (need of healthcare),,,, as one blogger who went
to the convention said... their
lives will not change at all, they will go
to the
same country clubs, their children will attend the
same ivy league schools, they have money for all necessities, etc..
My
right and wrong may not be the
same as yours, but my
right and wrong is not too concerned about what you believe as long as you aren't forcing me
to live according
to your beliefs.
If this country would start focusing on how
to help one another instead of
to hurt them our world would be a much better place
to live... And just so everyone knows I did lose someone close
to me in 911 and at the
same time 1 of my best friends are Muslim so it goes
to show that 2 wrongs do not make a
right!!!!
Jeremy i believe you are on the
right track my take is slightly different but we end up in the
same place if we look at the story we see the cross portrayed the condemned sinner judgement for sin condemnation and death Jesus the son of God intervenes on her behalf and forgives her and gives
life restoration and the chance for her
to start again without guilt or condemnation.That summs up our
life storys.
In a recent interview with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced in my
life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a
right to expect me
to uphold their
rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the
same religious beliefs that I had.
It's the
same mentality that causes ultra conservative sects
to think that with their
right doctrine and
right living they can weed out all moral and social ills.
This
same Jesus was crudified for the sins of he world and received up into glory... From that place at the
right hand of Gdo he sat down expecting till all his enemies be made his footstool... I am his servant and I testify
to you that he has filled me with his Spirit or if you like he downloaded himself; (his image in me) Christ dwells in me... near 34 years now... and I am building myself up into him... Because Christ
lives greatly in me... I feel no need
to force anyone
to accept me... and I certainly need no one who like Bill can not discern the
living God, yet...
to defing
to me what faith is... it is not an opinion because God has already proven himself
to me... but Bill is free
to his opinion... but I am goin got pray that God will be merciful
to him and give him some proof... some pentecostal proof...
Kennedy is the
same justice who gave out in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) that «At the heart of liberty, is the
right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human
life.»
That isn't what the Hebrew indicates and even if it said, «Thou shalt not kill», one has only
to flip a few pages
to see other commands that God gives
right in that
same passage that demand that the state, in this case the nation of Israel, take the
life of criminals for certain crimes.»
Each interpretation presupposed a particular pattern of eschatological outlook; and it is clear that the earliest Christology was really, as the term suggests, an eschatology, in which the central figure was the
same — the risen, glorified Christ who had
lived and talked and done mighty works in Galilee but had died on a cross outside Jerusalem, who was now at the
right hand of God, and was soon
to come in glory
to inaugurate the New Age.
CW, if gays shouldn't serve in the military, maybe they shouldn't be in the
same schools as «normal» people, or work in the
same jobs or pay the
same taxes or have the
same police and Judaical protections or the
right to vote or the
right to live anywhere in the country they choose.
6 --(yawn) Not sure what you are talking about due
to your usual vagueness, but I'll take a stab at it — If I am
right, and there is no heaven and no hell, you, as a believer and minister lose nothing by wasting years and years of your
life preaching a lie, and convincing hundreds, perhaps thousands
to believe that
same lie, and waste millions, no, billions of dollars
to pay for the continued propagation of that lie...?