Sentences with phrase «same rules of evidence»

Speeding trials in Texas are governed by the same Rules of Evidence and Code of Criminal Procedure that govern trials for offenses such as assault and theft.

A defendant is entitled to expect that a claim of liability brought against it will be decided by the same rules of evidence and substantive law whether the plaintiff is represented by counsel or self - represented.»

Not exact matches

It is best understood when scholars apply to it the same rules of analysis, evidence and logic used in philosophy, history and literature.

... and this is why this country is so backwards and falling behind the rest of the post-industrial countries... and why is it that these... nuts... will use rules of evidence and «science» to back claims of biblical proof... but reject the same critria when it is used against them?

At the same time they should intercede with Congress (House and Senate Judiciary committees) to approve Rule 506 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which would provide such protection in federal courts.

Atheists keep trying to apply scientifc rules of evidence where they don't belong — to matters of human affairs — yet are perfectly content to throw away the same rules when it suits their purposes (e.g., evolution).

For example, if an organic food shipment showed any evidence of pests or disease the shipment's owner was treating the so - called «organic» food the same way they would treat conventional food — fumigating it with pesticides that are prohibited under USDA organic rules.

«The use of intercept in evidence characterises a central dilemma we face as a free society - that of preserving our liberties and the rule of law, while at the same time keeping our nation safe and secure,» the prime minister said in a statement to the House of Commons.

To rule out the possibility that the unsuccessful search was due to their method, the researchers also used the same approach to look for evidence of the dispersal of aquatic invertebrates.

His own work with mice «provides converging evidence» that «this variant of the nicotinic receptor doesn't follow the same rules as the others do.»

A key new measurement of Mars» atmosphere by NASA's Curiosity rover provides the most definitive evidence yet of the origins of Mars meteorites while at the same time providing a way to rule out Martian origins of other meteorites.

A key new measurement of the inert gas argon in Mars» atmosphere by Curiosity's laboratory provides the most definitive evidence yet of the origin of Mars meteorites while at the same time providing a way to rule out Martian origin of other meteorites.

New Orleans provides evidence that charter schools can maintain superior performance even when they are subject to many of the same rules as district schools.

AR5 WGI, having insisted, in an unsigned statement on page 26 of B&O's evidence to the Russell Review, that the Wahl and Ammann paper did not break any rules in AR4, they could hardly use the same deadlines this time and expect to get away with it.

And the addition in 1999 - 2000, of the (still ignored) electronic records provisions» required proof of «systems integrity» in the Evidence Acts, was not simply another chapter added to the same old story, but rather a very different story requiring different rules and practices for discovery and admissibility proceedings.

Preservation of electronic documents on your own side of litigation is mandated by the same rules always governing preservation of evidence (such as ABA Model Rule 3.4), and also by specific e-discovery rules in place in the Federal (such as FRCP 26 (f)-RRB- and some state courts.

The summary conviction appeal court judge dismissed the appeals on the basis that the trial judge had jurisdiction in both matters, that the rules of procedure in both trials would essentially have been the same, and that Sciascia was not prejudiced by any differences in the applicable rules of evidence.

The jury's role is always the same - show up, be selected and sworn in, listen to the opening and closing arguments and the evidence that the judge admits under the rules of evidence, listen to the jury instructions from the judge, deliberate and render a verdict based upon that deliberation in a manner set forth on a jury verdict form that the jury is provided with by the judge, they do this for sub-minimum wage jury fees, a few free meals, and maybe a parking or transit voucher.

In Westerhof, the Court of Appeal heard two separate cases arising from car accidents that were linked by the same nagging question: whether evidence of treating physicians should be admitted if it did not comply with rule 53.03.

Courtroom dramas are so godawful in their utter disdain for (among many things) the rules of evidence that I can't even be in the same room when one is on.

Affidavits need to comply with the same rules that govern admissibility of evidence at trial.

In Russian Federation v Shuppe [2017], DJ Grant rejected an extraneous considerations argument on the basis that there was no direct evidence presented of the requested person's political opinions, despite ruling at the same time that the extradition request was motivated by the Russian regime's continuing preoccupation with a recognised political figure and his close connection with the requested person.

While the rules of evidence and procedure are not the same as they are in a true Court of Law tribunals can not decide cases without adherence to these basic rules.

However, rules on evidence in civil proceedings set forth deadlines by which documents and information need to be produced or alleged, and this may make it difficult to use information and documents that emerged at the end of the investigations in the context of civil proceedings started during the same investigations.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the foregoing enabling act and to the matters recited in the foregoing preface, that the annexed rules be and the same hereby are adopted for the regulation of original and appellate civil practice and procedure in judicial proceedings in the district courts of the State of Nevada, and the forms annexed thereto approved; that the same shall be effective on January 1, 1953; that publication thereof be made by the mailing of a printed copy by the clerk of this court to each member of the State Bar of Nevada according to the clerk's official list of membership of such Bar (which will include all district judges and district attorneys), and that the certificate of the clerk of this court as to such mailing, not less than sixty days prior to January 1, 1953, shall be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of said rules in accordance with the provisions of said enabling act.

It Is Hereby Ordered, pursuant to the provisions of NRS 2.120, that the annexed rules be and the same hereby are adopted for the government of the Supreme Court of Nevada and the legal profession in this state; that the same shall be effective on October 15, 1965; that publication thereof be made by the mailing of a printed copy by the clerk of this court to each member of the State Bar of Nevada according to the clerk's official list of membership of such Bar (which will include all district judges) and to each justice of the peace and to each police judge in this state, and that the certificate of the clerk of this court as to such mailing, not less than 30 days prior to October 15, 1965, shall be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of such rules in accordance with the provisions of NRS 2.120.

In the most important case in decades to rule on the admissibility of medical bills to prove damages, Law v. Griffith, slip op., July 20, 2010, the Supreme Judicial Court held that bills for medical care were presumptively evidence of the value of that care and that a defendant may not rebut or impeach that evidence by proving that the care provider took pennies on the dollar, but that such bills could be impeached with evidence that most insurers pay pennies on the dollar for the same services.

The trial court ruled in favor of MTPC on summary judgment and concluded that the undisputed evidence showed that G4S repeatedly withheld past due payments from its subcontractors at the same time that it sent certifications to MTPC representing and warranting that those same subcontractors had been paid.

Summary trials do not follow the same court process nor the formal rules of procedure and evidence as regular trials do.

Statement of Practice E4 provided that: «Life assurance policies and annuities are regarded as not being affected by the associated operations rule if, first, the policy was issued on full medical evidence of the assured's health and, second, it would have been issued on the same terms if the annuity had not been bought.»

Naming the Shadows is the first book to offer practitioners and students - in - training an in - depth exploration of a trauma - focused approach to individual and group psychotherapy that respects scientific rules of evidence and at the same time attempts to honor the complexity and subjectivity of an individual survivor's experience.