Sentences with phrase «same source pointed»

Not exact matches

This same source (who preferred not to be named) points to hospital CEOs» skyrocketing salaries.

Since then, additional sources and reports continue to point to the same conclusion: that hundreds, not dozens, of people died from the storm, despite claims by President Trump and Puerto Rican officials that the count is 62 or fewer.

The same sources noted that, in addition to its online lending platform and consumer bank, Goldman Sachs is creating a point of sale business that would give consumers loans when checking out at retailers or online.

The source is religion,... the Bible pointed out that Jews were the chosen people, and obviously when someone has that sort of ego, people on the outside are going to despise it,... in this case it was Christianity, Catholicism (same as Christianity), Islam, etc who felt they were the chosen people and so the hatred began.

At the same time, though, our own particular way of putting questions to the sources that are believed to contain a revelatory word will cause other hidden riches in these classic sources to go unnoticed by us, and it is the merit of Barth's theology to have emphasized this point.

Your use of a source to make a point about Islam when you disagree with other points in the same quote is a new technique I've never seen.

(The same point, of course, applies to the views contained within the sources themselves.)

There was obviously already to be found among the sources of the two Gospels, Luke and Matthew, a short presentation of Jesus» teaching, which consisted of the fragments that both Evangelists record at the same point.

I'm less sure about its protein options — according to a website called BusinessTravelLife, no two Hudson News stands have exactly the same stock, so it's hard to know — but Bihuniak points out that single - serving dairy sources like yogurt, cheese, and milk will do the trick.

Some may point to the fact that the AST has only about 1000 members and so the poll is not a true reflection of the fanbase, but I also think that the fact that a poll from the same source less than two years ago returned an even greater margin wanting Wenger to stay and if the staunch Wenger fans have changed their minds what does that say about the rest of us?

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

The criteria for religious exemption from the individual mandate and Social Security seem to be the same (as all sources I can find point to the same criteria for religious exemption), though policy may come to differ as people apply for religious exemptions.

Gennaro and other opponents of fracking in New York have raised the issue's visibility in part by pointing to the disastrous effects the practice has had in a number of Western states that have allowed it, and in Pennsylvania, which shares the same source of gas as New York State, the Marcellus Shale formation, which runs from the Southern Tier to West Virginia, and west to part of Ohio.

No 10 sources later pointed out that the prime minister had the same number of female cabinet ministers as Gordon Brown, the last Labour prime minister.

The same source told me the committee is just starting its fundraising efforts again, and will likely bring in — and spend — about the same as it did this year, but — and this point was stressed — the focus will be on bolstering Cuomo in a positive way, not attacking those who don't agree with him.

At the same time, a source close to the Queens congressman told The Point, Crowley has channeled pressure from the national party as well as powerful liberal unions.

The former EPA administrator also commented on Governor Cuomo's energy plan, to get 50 percent of energy from renewable sources by 2030 as a «step in the right direction,» but she disagrees with an $ 8 billion plan to finance upstate nuclear power plants, while Cuomo is at the same time pushing to close the downstate Indian Point nuclear power plant.

Biocrusts from the same source — representing four successive stages of maturation — were wet, and the soil water was sampled at five time points.

Although, as sceptics of the project have pointed out, U-Multirank will use the same, flawed data sources as existing league tables, the results will at least be tailored to the user.

That's because the objects in Rhie's sample lens all lie in the same plane and are simple point sources, with nothing between them.

On the same day, NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory took a picture of the source by pointing at it for 4 hours.

Giunti says that the magnitude of the anomaly uncovered by Lasserre is not statistically significant on its own, but that it points promisingly in the same direction as another anomaly found by the SAGE collaboration, which studied neutrinos from a radioactive source at the Baksan Neutrino Observatory in the Caucasus in 2005.

During the same period of Flint's water source change, 5.1 percent of Jackson, Mich. children age five and under, 8 percent of Grand Rapids, Mich. children and 7.5 percent of Detroit children had blood lead levels higher than the CDC reference point (compared with 3.7 percent of Flint children).

Despite being trumpeted in certain circles as meaning that there's really nothing to worry about regarding the Greenland ice sheet, the authors made a point of noting (although not in this press release) that an additional source of mass loss needs to be identified in order to reconcile their results with the GRACE data (which do not show a reduction in mass loss for the same period).

This story is still just hypothetical, but astrophysicists point to a piece of supporting evidence: The FRBs are coming from the same vicinity as a steady source of radio emission — possibly the background signal from the expanding debris cloud that surrounds the young magnetar.

The available literature points to the same conclusion that many of us feel intuitively - that food sources are better than supplements whenever possible and this is especially true with calcium.

Clearly, the source of health is not the dairy and the oil, in the same way olive oil is not the source of health for Italians, for the reasons you pointed out.

The authors give examples of how principals in crises tapped into each source of strength and point readers to an online self - reflection tool (the Leader Resilience Profile) that can help readers do the same.

Some e-book producers use InDesign as a starting point so they can produce both PDF and EPUB files from the same source document.

But both approaches have the same starting point: comparing your regular sources of income to monthly expenses.

How to grade your dog's food: Start with a grade of 100: 1) For every listing of «by - product», subtract 10 points 2) For every non-specific animal source -LRB-» meat» or «poultry», meat, meal or fat) reference, subtract 10 points 3) If the food contains BHA, BHT, or ethoxyquin, subtract 10 points 4) For every grain «mill run» or non-specific grain source, subtract 5 points 5) If the same grain ingredient is used 2 or more times in the first five ingredients (I.e. «ground brown rice», «brewers rice», «rice flour» are all the same grain), subtract 5 points 6) If the protein sources are not meat meal and there are less than 2 meats in the top 3 ingredients, subtract 3 points 7) If it contains any artificial colorants, subtract 3 points 8) If it contains ground corn or whole grain corn, subtract 3points 9) If corn is listed in the top 5 ingredients, subtract 2 more points 10) If the food contains any animal fat other than fish oil, subtract 2 points 11) If lamb is the only animal protein source (unless your dog is allergic to other protein sources), subtract 2 points 12) If it contains soy or soybeans, subtract 2 points 13) If it contains wheat (unless you know that your dog is not allergic to wheat), subtract 2 points 14) If it contains beef (unless you know that your dog is not allergic to beef), subtract 1 point 15) If it contains salt, subtract 1 point

I'm sure it applies to cat food as well: How to grade your dog's food: Start with a grade of 100: 1) For every listing of «by - product», subtract 10 points 2) For every non-specific animal source -LRB-» meat» or «poultry», meat, meal or fat) reference, subtract 10 points 3) If the food contains BHA, BHT, or ethoxyquin, subtract 10 points 4) For every grain «mill run» or non-specific grain source, subtract 5 points 5) If the same grain ingredient is used 2 or more times in the first five ingredients (i.e. «ground brown rice», «brewerâ $ ™ s rice», «rice flour» are all the same grain), subtract 5 points 6) If the protein sources are not meat meal and there are less than 2 meats in the top 3 ingredients, subtract 3 points 7) If it contains any artificial colorants, subtract 3 points 8) If it contains ground corn or whole grain corn, subtract 3 points 9) If corn is listed in the top 5 ingredients, subtract 2 more points 10) If the food contains any animal fat other than fish oil, subtract 2 points 11) If lamb is the only animal protein source (unless your dog is allergic to other protein sources), subtract 2 points 12) If it contains soy or soybeans, subtract 2 points 13) If it contains wheat (unless you know that your dog is not allergic to wheat), subtract 2 points 14) If it contains beef (unless you know that your dog is not allergic to beef), subtract 1 point 15) If it contains salt, subtract 1 point Extra Credit: 1) If any of the meat sources are organic, add 5 points 2) If the food is endorsed by any major breed group or nutritionist, add 5 points 3) If the food is baked not extruded, add 5 points 4) If the food contains probiotics, add 3 points 5) If the food contains fruit, add 3 points 6) If the food contains vegetables (NOT corn or other grains), add 3 points 7) If the animal sources are hormone - free and antibiotic - free, add 2 points 8) If the food contains barley, add 2 points 9) If the food contains flax seed oil (not just the seeds), add 2 points 10) If the food contains oats or oatmeal, add 1 point 11) If the food contains sunflower oil, add 1 point 12) For every different specific animal protein source (other than the first one; count «chicken» and «chicken meal» as only one protein source, but «chicken» and «'' as 2 different sources), add 1 point 13) If it contains glucosamine and chondroitin, add 1 point 14) If the vegetables have been tested for pesticides and are pesticide - free, add 1 point

As long as he doesn't have loose stools or digestive upset at that point you can introduce one new protein source, and follow the same protocol.

THE SCORING METHOD FOR DOG FOOD: How to grade your dogâ $ ™ s food: Start with a grade of 100: 1) For every listing of â $ œby - productâ $, subtract 10 points 2) For every non-specific animal source (â $ meatâ $ or â $ œpoultryâ $, meat, meal or fat) reference, subtract 10 points 3) If the food contains BHA, BHT, or ethoxyquin, subtract 10 points 4) For every grain â $ œmill runâ $ or non-specific grain source, subtract 5 points 5) If the same grain ingredient is used 2 or more times in the first five ingredients (I.e. â $ œground brown riceâ $, â $ œbrewers riceâ $, â $ œrice flourâ $ are all the same grain), subtract 5 points 6) If the protein sources are not meat meal and there are less than 2 meats in the top 3 ingredients, subtract 3 points 7) If it contains any artificial colorants, subtract 3 points 8) If it contains ground corn or whole grain corn, subtract 3points 9) If corn is listed in the top 5 ingredients, subtract 2 more points 10) If the food contains any animal fat other than fish oil, subtract 2 points 11) If lamb is the only animal protein source (unless your dog is allergic to other protein sources), subtract 2 points 12) If it contains soy or soybeans, subtract 2 points 13) If it contains wheat (unless you know that your dog is not allergic to wheat), subtract 2 points 14) If it contains beef (unless you know that your dog is not allergic to beef), subtract 1 point 15) If it contains salt, subtract 1 point

When you double dip, you earn miles and points from 2 sources for the same purchase.

I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being made against your claims.

«Thanks to you, Xbox One continues to outpace Xbox 360 at the same point in time in the Xbox 360 generation, making it the best - selling console in Xbox console history» Read more at http://news.xbox.com/2016/0... I'm sure you'll have a problem with the source, but just google it and you'll find several sites reporting the same thing.

In the interest of not making the same mistake twice, we have decided that from this point forward we will officially discontinue the development of new features / content for Insurgency on Source Engine.

Many signs point to a rumored Nintendo 3DS remake of Wario Land which came form the same source who revealed the 3DS Warioware game that has been confirmed.

While I was at the meeting, however, I received an email from a Cooper Union employee, who shared with me that Lemiesz was fired, and that all sources pointed to the same for Westcott.

It is likely that the same source photographs from the 1960s were used as the starting point for each of these printed images.

I see three (at least) independent sources of data all pointing in the same dramatic direction — Semiletov and team's direct observations, instrumental CH4 data, and instrumental CO2 data (the later many more than two data points and from more than one location).

Perhaps more to the point, the rate at which carbon was being added to the atmosphere was around the same as today from human sources.

An alternative hypothesis, consistent with at least some of the «known» paleo - parameters would be that the same shift in prevailing winds that doomed the PIS simultaneously drove PIS - sourced icebergs toward the core points in the Scotia Sea and delivered increased moisture to the Antarctic Pennisula, thereby expanding its ice sheet.

Over the last couple of weeks, I've seen four major reports (details over the fold) from very different sources, all making the same point: decarbonizing the world economy will involve economic costs that are (a) small; and (b) far outweighed by the benefits And, the empirical evidence so far is strong.

«Inverse - square law The intensity (or illuminance or irradiance) of light or other linear waves radiating from a point source (energy per unit of area perpendicular to the source) is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source; so an object (of the same size) twice as far away, receives only one - quarter the energy (in the same time period).»

Are you the same John A that missed the external source point in the thermos example, as both Charlie and I have noted?

And, to anwer your next point, yes, if there is no heat source in the house, it will drop in temperature until it is at the same temperature as the surroundings.

Also, the back - radiation that we receive is diffuse (coming from all different angles) and so it can not be focused in the same way that solar radiation (which is approximately from a point source) can.

RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?