Sentences with phrase «same text in»

epub format should be different, for the purposes of election law, from the same text in.

Googling turns up the same text in a 2008 patent application by Al - shameri & Wegman but no other sources.

Yes, I've seen that & presumed it is a sloppy typo — it should say «after a bad debt provision» as it does in the same text in the Dec - 12 final results, and in the Trade & Other Receivables and Related Party Transactions notes in both final & interim results.

Lower weight for reviewers that didn't buy the book, didn't read the kindle book, never purchase anything, only give 1 or 5 star reviews, use the same text in multiple reviews, etc..

Having a single print book, or an ebook with one simultaneous user, is risky when multiple students in a class may want access to the same text in the same week, says Sowards.

Some people say you need an ISBN for each type of ebook (epub, mobi), but as long as it's the same text in that version, use the same ISBN so that sales numbers are counted together.

Here is the same text in a different version:

Perhaps, though, you the reader (without the narrator's help) would have read that same text in your mind's ear as trailing off at the end or with sarcasm.

Readers also have the option to hit the Translate button, and to read that same text in a more modern rendition.

In reading they will comment on authorial perspective, review and extend own strategies finterpretations of same text in different media.

Not exact matches

Someone who is psyched to work with text, photos, video, graphics, and audio — often all in the same story.

The system used to generate the fake comments swapped out words in such phrases again and again — for instance, switching «people like me» for «individual citizens» and «products» for «services» — to produce 1.3 million superficially distinct variations on the same basic block of text.

Are you bored of trying same old text fonts in your document?

Also, if you're putting a CTA in a button, long strings of text won't have the same visual impact as a short CTA.

If two sites have basically the same content, cover the same topic, and have the same keyword saturation (the percentage of keywords in the entire text), then the one with the higher PageRank will almost always come out on top.

It was with these subjects in mind that he cleverly and deliberately had the book formatted to be the same size and shape of an iPad Air, which changed how he wrote and presented the text and page layout.

Any - To - Any means an entirely new range of visual collaboration options for small businesses Imagine a world in which people had to use the same wireless carrier to talk, text or -LSB-...]

Below is a continuous contract chart that shows the price action a bit more clearly (note: because of the nature of this chart, prices are diverging somewhat from the spot prices we mention in the text; but the divergences are small and the general shape of the chart is the same).

There have been filters in place since 2006 that will penalize a site for over using the same anchor text.

In the same way, let the text reveal it to you in your meditatioIn the same way, let the text reveal it to you in your meditatioin your meditation.

In the same breath, let us also just believe that the religious fanaticism shown by some Muslims is also an act of corruption of their own sacred text.

What finally emerged in the summer of 1518 from this frantic rethinking — recall that Luther was trying to work through the theological issue while at the same time explaining to the world why he shouldn't be burned at the stake for heresy — seems to have been shaped primarily by reflection on texts such as Matthew 16:19: «Whatever you loose on earth is loosed in heaven.»

* I love the irony of that verse being in a letter to and from the same people as the main proof text used for exclusion of females.

If you are honest you have to wrestle with these issues or be subjected to the same form of proof texting and selective reading of the Bible discussed in the article above.

Sorry, Steve... we were saying the same thing back in the»70s... and»80s... and»90s... and we were especially certain of our Lord's soon return in the»70s thanks to our bold and accurate brother in the Lord, Hal Lindsey and his master text (second only to the New testament) «the Late Great Planet Earth»!

The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas presented as an explanation for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation for a different text.

Whatever Paul said is not the same as what Jesus is quoted as saying in the gospels — we all have these texts and we can check them ourselves... Jesus says nothing on homosexuality — but why?

The same message is repeated in many other places, I've just included a few representative text samples.

All that Bergson asserts — and we shall see that in many of his texts Whitehead implicitly adopts the same view — is that this difference, real as it is, is nevertheless only that of degree, not that of nature, for one simple reason: that the past is always totally immanent in the present, even though in different degrees of vividness.

Just because Christ is shown doing or being certain things for the church in the Ephesians 5:21 - 33 text, does not mean that husbands are to do or be each of those same things for their wives.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

It is difficult to listen to a text when there are other texts in the room talking about the same subject matter, often in ways more elaborate and more familiar.

Had Trump wandered into my church — St. Luke's Episcopal Church in Cleveland, Tennessee — that morning, he would have encountered the very same texts.

In fact, the present text of Matthew's gospel, in many passages, is almost word for word the same as Mark's gospel, which was written in GreeIn fact, the present text of Matthew's gospel, in many passages, is almost word for word the same as Mark's gospel, which was written in Greein many passages, is almost word for word the same as Mark's gospel, which was written in Greein Greek.

One of the things I look for most in commentaries is the ability to explain the text in an understandable way while at the same time making the message of the text applicable and pertinent to our time today.

It is scarcely a year since that was proposed and nevertheless, thanks to computer technology and to contacts which we can establish rapidly across the internet, there are coalitions in over twenty countries which worked together, which have undertaken actions together, on the same day, each one in their country, and which were united around texts worked out jointly over the internet.

I know that the end of Mark is a disputed text though, but the same line of thought occurs in Acts 14:3: «Paul and Barnabas spent considerable time there, speaking boldly for the Lord, who confirmed the message of his grace by enabling them to perform signs and wonders.»

It seems to me that almost all of the alternative hermeneutics propose to do precisely what we have agreed can not and ought not to be done: provide a conceptuality into which to translate what the texts originally meant in such a way as to preserve that self - same essence of meaning but render it more intelligible today.

[Notably, many of the texts in question are the exact same texts — the Household Codes of Ephesians, Colossians, and 1 Peter — that are used today to support gender hierarchy in the home.

They often explore a text and are never troubled if the same text has already been used in several previous addresses.

Those words were written by the same men who wrote the surrounding text in black.

My problems with this book are the same problems I have with nearly all books about biblical criticism: I believe the presuppositions of most of those who engage in biblical criticism are inherently flawed, and as a result, short - circuit the creative thinking that is necessary to discover solutions to the so - called problems in the biblical text.

Scraps of that ancient text were found in the same cave as the Dead Sea Scrolls but have yet to be publically released.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

As such, and since the God of Islam is the same God of Christianity and Judaism (according to the Quran that just been certified), Christianity and Judaism are true religions of God with text that has been corrupted (another reason you find contradictions with science because ordinary humans changed the word of God so you can see the flaws in it).

Reader - response criticism thus accounts for the different understandings of and reactions to the «same» text by different readers by claiming a necessary place for the subjective element in reading.

It is what the Greek word used in Matthew means, and this word is used by the Septuagint in Hosea 6:6; but Jesus would either have quoted the Hebrew text or used an Aramaic translation, and the Aramaic word is the same as the Hebrew.

So, for example, if your hear a pastor saying, «You have to take up your cross daily and follow Jesus in order to go to heaven when you die,» you can look in the text he is preaching from (maybe Matthew 16:24 - 26 or Luke 9:23 - 26), and see that Jesus is talking about saving your life (which is NOT the same thing as receiving eternal life) by living in a profitable way here on earth (cf. Luke 9:24 - 25).

Don't get mad when we do not intepret the text in the same manner as the Taliban.

Significantly, the same passage in Hebrews that describes so vividly the reality the heavenly church gathered in eschatological assembly with the angels and believers of all time also provides the strongest proof text in the Bible for regular church attendance, «Forsake not the assembling of yourselves together» (Hebrews 10:25).