Sentences with phrase «same thing you suggested»

Hi Steph great ideas I will try same things you suggest, bandit signs, but I am in New York Brooklyn and there is so many investors here in Brooklyn I don't even think I have a chance to a deal done here, it's like a cut trout out here, I still going to try I am so eager to make my first deal

Not exact matches

The same things you generally do to avoid catching any flu — wash your hands and steer clear of the guy hacking and sniffing on the subway or airplane (and hey, if you're want to try stocking up on Vitamin C, you'd be in good company, even if science suggests you're probably not accomplishing much).

The UK doc told me the same thing, but also suggested I might have Meniere's Disease, and wanted to send me to a specialist to get it checked out.

Instead, O'Reilly suggested that the U.S. government make it easy for entrepreneurs to develop applications that improve or enhance things it already does — in the same way that privately owned weather websites use data from the National Weather Service.

Sandberg suggests an easy intervention: During performance reviews or in other situations when a woman comes under criticism, simply ask: «If a man did exactly those same things, what would you say?»

So I do what I'm good at, and I suggest that all of you do the same thing.

I'm not suggesting we'll see the same thing happen here in the U.S. Nevertheless, rampant money - printing has certainly contributed to many people's dwindling trust in traditional monetary systems.

Those who angrily oppose the kinds of things you have said are the same who devoutly reject Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, but will fight you if you suggest that they will not get into heaven without Him.

I'm not as fond of repet tively cross-posting the same things to every topic I can find as you, so I simply suggest you go back and pay attention to previous threads.

I agree that God didn't pursue Adam to smash his face in, never suggested that or alluded to it, but there is no confusion where sin leads and there is no doubt about the consequences off those who love their lives, they will lose it where as those that hate their lives will find it... So to conclude, Jesus and the father are not two different things, they are both the very same in as much as God desires all to be saved and has shown the way to salvation.

I don't believe in God, vampires, Santa Claus, leprechauns, monster under my bed, talking horses, unicorns, elves, and a thousand other things, all for the exact same reason: I see nothing whatsoever to suggest any of them exist.

Its criteria of excellence as a concrete social reality, I have suggested, are rooted in the same thing that makes it theological: the overarching goal of all its practices to understand God truly.

This in turn suggests the possibility that at some level some sort of monism is inescapable, and that if the monism of Christ is rejected, the monism of the State» or of the Majority or of the Party, which amounts to the same thing» is the most readily available alternative.

I suggest that everyone do the same; you'll be shocked and surprised about MANY things;O)

If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?

I agree that my definition of «myth» is open to misunderstanding, but at the same time I am convinced that it is more satisfactory than the alternative you suggest («By «mythological» we mean the presentation of unobservable realities in terms of observable phenomena») For one thing, «observable» may prove too narrow a term and «unobservable» too broad, since all spiritual attitudes are unobservable.

Marissa, Let me suggest something... stop thinking that all Christians believe the same thing, and then before you criticize what I believe, maybe spend some time checking to see what I believe.

At the same time, the wondrous capabilities of the human brain, which far exceed in complexity all other created things, suggest to him that a little anthropocentrism is not such a bad thing: «Part of our glory,» he muses, «is that we can imagine that we are not the most remarkable creatures in the entire universe.»

He applauds the book's warnings about the biotechnological threats confronting us, but suggests that these developments are only the logical next thing in the project of modernity and liberalism, the two being pretty much the same thing.

Reading further as Cindy suggests, I see other things that raise the same caution.

The Christian thing itself, I suggest, can be encountered concretely in and as Christian congregations; its major and most demonic distortions can also be encountered in the same place.

I suggested the same thing in an article I posted last year: http://doableevangelism.com/2008/06/01/busting-the-myth-of-pre-evangelism/

He argued: «Research suggests that if you take out the different school factors and you compare the achievements of children in the same school it would be as small as 0.02 per cent of the difference, so it's clearly not a geographical thing, it's a wide - spread issue across the board.»

However, suggesting that it's useeful to be able to help your neighbour, is not the same thing as saying you're going to hell because your neighbour hasn't asked you for help.

It is not quite the same thing as concentration, which suggests an intense focusing of the mind in order to see or hear something accurately.

So, though it made all of us a bit sad — as my mother said, «You think things will always be the same» — I suggested that we meet in New Orleans, an easy 2 1/2 hour drive from their home and a not - too - terrible flight from here.

I haven't had the oil issue myself but another commentator below (Emily) mentioned the same experience — I suggested a few things in case you want to scroll down and have a look at our convo — stirring the nut butter to full, creamy integration may be one of the keys.

I'm very confused as you suggest to get cold pressed rapeseed oil but not canola but rapeseed and canola are the same thing?

A friend is doing the same and highly suggested I purchased one of these to help makes things that go into this diet.

Despite just over half an hour of league football under his belt the German played an absolute blinder and that suggests that he could do the same thing when called upon next season.

Sol Campbell spoke about how the defensive solidity of Leicester City helped them to beat us to the title last season and suggested that the same thing is likely to help Chelsea this time.

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

Goalkeepers — Cech is a solid keeper but can no longer make those big time saves that require stretching from post to post... Ospina plays too small and often does the same things we used to crucify Szczy for but nowhere near as talented... as for Martinez, it's too early to tell, but the fact that we seem to be looking elsewhere for Cech's replacement suggests that he's backup material

The simple math suggests the same thing is true with you, though.

At the same time, you insulted the new people as the LA move related comments thing and suggest that the content is doing just fine from the staff.

I think that you can level the same sort of thing at most clubs and teams and I also think that the Gunners have answered the questions and proved a lot of the critics wrong, but I have just seen a report in the Daily Mail that suggests that they may be spot on with at least one of the criticisms levelled at us recently.

I totally disagree with you as this is the same thing that was said by a few guys when we suggested Costa as our front man.

And earlier this week the Man City and Belgium star Kevin De Bruyne, as reported by the Evening Standard, suggested that the same thing could happen to Ozil.

Team mate Valtteri Bottas said much the same thing, and suggested that he could already feel the effects when he was as much as two seconds behind another car:

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

And maybe the struggles of David Moyes last season and then the same for Louis van Gaal and Brendan Rodgers this time suggest that this might not be such a bad thing for the Gunners.

My last comment on this blog did ask people to put things into perspective, but it was only to highlight that not all moms feel exactly the same way and that certainly Motrin didn't mess up on purpose as some were suggesting.

I was definitely stressing about it when I heard how much other babies the same age were eating, and when my pediatrician suggested that she should be having 3 meals a day — at the time I was lucky to have her enjoy a spoonful or two at each «meal» before she would push things away.

(Yes, I know Obamacare is not the same thing as the NHS) My friend suggested I was being ridiculous to prioritize that over providing any healthcare at all to a lot of people who don't have it now.

An aside: I would suggest that «open adoption» and «openness in adoption» are not exactly the same thing.

The same helpful «Five Things» author had compiled a list that included a car seat and stroller but now also suggested sippy cups, potty and crayons.

i was thinking the same thing when the article suggested to let your spirited toddler play in the sink... that could be very dangerous!

They suggest that when we read this book to little ones, we ask them, «Do you do the same things as the boy in this book?»

We wanted to create something which showed other dads that a) it's OK to make mistakes, b) it's OK to get frustrated and c) everyone else is going through the exact same thing — regardless of what the world of Instagram might suggest.

... some of the things you suggested in your blog are known to pose a health risk to your child and family, such as co-sleeping in the same bed (lowest SIDS risk is same room / different bed), or washing cloth diapers in a household washer without appropriate temperature / soap / rinse etc..