Sentences with phrase «same way point»

REITs may find themselves in possession of private consumer data which must be protected in the same way point - of - sale credit card data must be protected.

The miles on this card translate to dollars the same way points do on the Bank of America card.

Not exact matches

You can use points from the Reserve the same ways as with the Preferred, except that you'll get a 50 % bonus when booking travel through Chase, making your points worth 1.5 cents each.

The beauty of this system is that you book your award travel the same way you book any other reservations, and you can even earn additional rewards points or miles on the travel you book using award travel.

Apple has built Siri into a number of devices at this point — the iPhone, Apple TV, HomePod — but it doesn't quite work the same way on every product.

«At the same time, the efficiency and the point - to - point transportation just allows you to move things very fast, very quickly and in a smart way.»

However, the United award chart shows that business class saver tickets only cost 60,000 each way, or 120,000 round - trip for the same exact flight, a quarter of how many miles or points you would have needed with cash back or a statement credit.

The point being that, rather than packaging and boxing each park in the same way, each one gets to carve its own path to Landon.

Not least because the Shiller p / e is, at 25, well above the historical average and other market indicators (like the Q ratio) are pointing the same way.

«This may have had a couple extra digits compared to someone else's operation, but they all benefited in the same way,» he said, pointing to the $ 916 million loss on Mr. Trump's tax returns.

Then she asked if the Obama campaign violated those same policies in 2012 when it collected user data in a similar way through its own app, which a lot of people have pointed to in the wake of this Cambridge Analytica scandal.

(In much the same way, I bet people who remember the «Whassup» ads at this point have no memory of the product they advertised.)

Both cards distribute ThankYou ® Points in the same way.

If, according to her, her «down syndrome» baby is god's gift, and is normal in God's point of view, then why do we see her hatred and vitriole, when she talks about the same god - created individuals, who are also normal, but in a bit different way?

However, if you view this from the Hebrew point of view, «teachings» are not «kept» or «broken» the same way.

the same priests that take an oath under God to do good mispresent themselves again and again its morally not right» anybody under legal law to be molested in the name of religion is wrong dead wrong and the point is a pedaphile can never be cured sp whats the alternative (death that way innocence is not lost on bottom dweelers) i say feet first in a meat grinder in low gear i'm just saying

So my question to you even before it gets to that point is the same as I have given to others, first why do you hate God so much and second what are you afraid of by switching your faith and it is by faith that you believe there is no God to a belief that God does exist he sent his Son Jesus to the world to redeem you from your evil and hateful ways?

They always end the same way, they point to physical cause.

idk, he's got a point, dude... some people hang around these boards way too long, spouting the same nonsense over and over.

Bonhoeffer points out that we do not assume that parents are obligated to be truthful in the same way children are.

... switch from using a mac to using a pc and expect the same thing... or go back to religion and get the same shunning from the atheists that you got from whatever church that was that you blindly followed... now you get to be the poster child for atheists the same way a repentant drugged up rock star gets to be the poster child for church... except from the atheists» arrogant point of view, you went from uneducated, ignorant, bigoted, intolerant and stupid to being sophisticated, intellectual, open minded and free thinking... in their opinion you were formerly a stupid a s s...

In his humorous but pointed book Confessions of a Workaholic, Wayne Oates has summarized much of our modern belief in these words: «The workaholic's way of life is considered in America to be at one and the same time (a) a religious virtue, (b) a form of patriotism, (c) the way to win friends and influence people, and (d) the way to be healthy, wealthy, and wise.

28 In another penetrating statement, Altizer makes the same point: «Is the dark negativity of our emptiness so overwhelming that no way is present to us of celebrating emptiness as a mask of total bliss?»

Matthew, Mark, and Luke have the same general point of view, share much of the same material, and present it in much the same way.

What is particularly noticeable is the way the Genesis flood story follows the Gilgamesh flood tale «point by point and in the same order», even when the story permits other alternatives.

The number was the highest of any demographic group, and 20 points higher than the 50 percent of Americans who felt the same way.

Here then is where we arrive at the point: Just as God calls people to respond to His Word with obedience and righteousness through the exercise of their choices (non-meritorious though they might be) and fully expects them to be able to do so, in the same way, God calls people to believe in Jesus for eternal life, and fully expects them to be able to do so (cf. John 3:16; 5:24; 6:47).

To put this point another way: X causes Y is not the same thing as X entails Y.

In the same letter he argues that Catholicism will be the only lasting form of Christianity; this argument also appears in Democracy, as Peter mentions, but without mention of the letter's key point that Protestantism is a half - way house between «reason» and «authority» that can not maintain its contradictory position over the long run, and which thus must lose its adherents to these two poles.

While I tend to agree with the views posted by Cpt Obvious, Tim, dandintac, et al, I do admire that you are presenting your point of view in a personal manner and seem to have put some actual thought into it and you recognize that not everyone will have the same experience as you, and you don't condemn others for not feeling the same way (although it does make me wonder what your thoughts are on eternal torment for non-believers).

They are so error - prone, even from a technocratic point of view, at least in part because they are actually engaged in a non-technocratic enterprise that is pervasively ideological, in the same way that Soviet science was ideological.

Once the shock wore off though, I realized that money abuses and issues, while endemic within churches, still only account for a portion of the many ways in which churches have wounded people and thus there is undoubtedly plenty of people in search of a safe place who do not have any of the same issues that I have with linking money and spirituality, so really you were only excluding a certain portion of people from safety by attaching a price tag to it, those for whom money issues are a sticking point and of course those who simply don't have the extra funds to commit.

Whatever you bind in heaven will be bound on earth... so at this point Jesus is now clearing things up for Peter the same way I'm clearing things up for you (I hope).

The Qur» anic language of the form - spirit is used with reference to the cosmic becoming of al - khalq in Ibn» Arabi.38 The point is that al - khalq as pure thought of the worlds to be [SP] receives its being as the actualized worlds in the same way as Jesus came into being.

There is only one way to silence at this point and he gets to use it to try and convince others what a great citizen he is at the same time.

We have been taught to pray in the way which you have pointed out, yet never once considering the other side has been praying the same way.

In the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous points).

If you say the same thing: «I am the Way and the Truth, you (pointing at you) can not see the truth without going through me».

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

It's possible — and I may defend this at some point — that he was using the philosophical vocabulary at hand to explain some of the same phenomena that Mr. Morton is attempting to solve, albeit in very different ways and with very different presuppositions.

In the same way that the sacred points to the God who is in all reality, so worship — while it may be something we do in a separate time and place dedicated to this particular purpose — must point to a life that is lived towards that which we worship.

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

Picking his way expertly through three centuries of scientific history, from Newton on gravity (the force that causes apples to fall and planets to stay in orbit is the same), through electricity and magnetism (aspects of a single reality), to the present search for a Grand Unified Theory, he argued that the coherence of the physical universe progressively uncovered by science points to a «unity principle» at its heart.

For example, when Berger points out that the puzzles of historical scholarship often lead Biblical theologians to crises of faith he expresses it this way: «I have sometimes asked myself how a gynecologist could manage to have sexual intercourse; by the same token, one could ask how a New Testament scholar could be a Christian.»

If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?

Ogden affirms the same point in yet another way.

Anyway, @godless — I have the same questions — at this point they have become rhetorical because no one has been able to answer them in a way that makes sense to me.

The point to remember as you read Josh's summary is that people do not read Scripture the same way you do.

In the same way, but with more imaginative detail, the empty tomb has become in John a «sign» of the Johannine type, pointing to the heavenly exaltation of the crucified Jesus.36

Ivan continues, and makes the same point in a different way.