Sentences with phrase «same way you speak»

«You should speak to potential advisors the same way you speak to potential investors, except you're not asking for money.

Please, next time you talk to God, tell Him that I am open to His instruction and correction, and that anytime He wants to correct my theology, He can come speak to me the same way He speaks to you.

I doubt many were speaking of those players the same way they speak of Theo before they up and left.

In some respects this step can be split into the two categories, in much the same way we spoke about inner and outer confidence.

Not exact matches

In the same way that Bach spoke of his mother as a strong female influence in his life, and Tory credited her success in part to her fathers insistence that she could do whatever she wanted to, Leroux also praised her parents for their guidance.

That way, everyone is on the same page and speaking the same language when collaborating on projects.

In other words, decisions about business solutions are indeed based on trust, emotions, and aspirations, and business software users need to be entertained, connected with, and spoken to in their interactions with technology vendors in exactly the same way as when engaging with consumer brands like Apple, Nike, and Starbucks.

And the same way Rhoades had Axelrod define his own problem and speak it, Shull has her clients identify the emotions they are connecting to their weaknesses, giving them a name and feeling them fully.

Speaking to CNBC's Squawk Alley at Davos, Benioff said, «I think that you do it exactly the same way that you regulated the cigarette industry.

Speak in the same way.

Generally speaking, you won't really have to learn a new shaving technique when using a safety razor, as you'll hold and shave with it in much the same way as you would any other razor.

Religion and faith are a personal choice and journey as is the lack of either; I raised my son and daughter much in the same ways I was raised and I am proud of their understanding and acceptance of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, that they do not look down on or speak ill of others who believe differently than they.

Speaking for myself, although the same would be true for most of the others, I was working within a broadly Augustinian way of thinking about these matters» a tradition that sharply distinguishes between the city of God and the city of man, and insists that the one can never be transformed into the other.

In speaking of the «Persons» in God, we do not use the term in exactly the same way we use it when speaking of people.

humans can not speak to animals the same way they can not speak to a human?

In the same way, if the Bible is inaccurate when it speaks of geology, why should its theology be trusted?

I was trying to acknowledge someone's complaint about the strong language while at the same time explaining that it is only another way to speak that might require a small effort to translate.

I speak of how I felt yesterday and what I am doing today in a way that appears to imply that the same «I» suffers and acts in different ways at different times.

oops again, then if it said G - d spoke then G - d spoke inerrent through the writer which we may believe in the same way we believe the more sure word of prophecy, the gospel itself, foolishness to those perishing and so on,... does it give me words to live by, then the answer to your question and my application in my own life the answer would have to be Yes.

We can not speak of soulish death the same way we can speak of physical or spiritual death.

Since the churches aspire to speak in the name of God, they have to direct every criticism, first of all, against themselves, admitting in this way that they are met by the same judgment as those criticized by them.14

Surely, a loving God would speak to us in the exact same ways if necessary.

In the same way, as the culture around us changes, the Church must learn the language and speak it, at the same time offering a «counter-cultural culture» that is different from the culture of the mileu (but not so different as to be inaccessible).

Throughout different encounters I remember realizing that the ones who had spoken to me in a blunt fashion left me feeling defeated, while the ones who said the same thing in a kind and thoughtful way left me feeling energized to improve myself.

The stories of Abraham take their pattern from the experience of Israel, but they also speak instructively back to that same experience, illustrating not only the way of faith — but the way also of unfaith.

Credence must be given to the writer in one area though in that Christendom has failed in some ways to properly «speak» or represent Christ from their pulpits and daily walk; some spew out false doctrine and self - serving «religiosity» that one can not be surprised that the Enemy (Satan) is now using those same words and actions to accuse them through writers such as we see here.

If, in Genesis, individual legends and originally separate cycles of legends are combined in such a way as to convey the theological drama of Israel, if the spoken lines are the lines of the play, we observe at the same time that this literary material of legend always refuses to yield itself completely to such editorial, theological design..

To speak of a leap into the light suggests that there are continuities of faith with the other ways in which we know the world around us, that it is this same world, which we already know in part, which is now seen for what it truly and ultimately is by reason of the light which is eternal.

It boils down to fago means «eat» mostly the same way that we mean when we say «eat», usually it is literally, but it can be conceived of as figuratively: when it speaks of Israel eating manna, we understand it to mean literally, but we can conceive of it meaning something figurative.

Küng explained his approach to the theme as follows: Often he speaks with a coreligionist who is identified with the same confessional and ecclesiastical heritage as Küng's; yet they seem to approach matters in radically different ways.

When laypeople speak, those in the pews hear the same story told in many ways, and can imagine where their own story might fit in God's history.

In the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous points).

To begin with, I think we must admit that when Whitehead speaks of the subject being constituted of its objects and the cause passing into the effect, he means, at least in part, that the objects / causes are reproduced by way of likeness insofar as the subject / effect assumes the same forms.

Or rather, perhaps in his celebration of the negro spiritual, he was speaking about music which rises above the «color line» in the same way that he says Shakespeare and Goethe do.

And what they all say in different words is fundamentally the same thing, just as seven sons of a good mother speaks each in his own way of her.

It is refreshing in an age when Richard Rorty and his followers have told us that we can not speak this way to hear a philosopher doing so, but, at the same time, it is hard to know what to make of such talk in the light of Taylor's other claims.

To put it in the way in which others have spoken, both eucharistic celebration and proclamation of the gospel should always be in a fashion that is appropriate to the witness of the Christian past and at the same time available for the thinking and feeling of the people who take part.

In the same way the Word spoken by God in Christ is undoubtedly modified by the church, and not for the better.

You speak of the law and the const «itution as something that is seen by everyone the exact same way.

In talking about God with images we do not say that God is such and such, we say that God is like such and such (the same way that Jesus spoke about the Kingdom of God in his parables).

Dalahäst If not true, then it only speaks to us the same way that the Greek myths of Prometheus and Pandora do, or the way any bit of good fiction does, right?

by the way, in either the book of Jasher or Jubilees, it says that animals spoke the same dialect and could communicate with humans.

What Mark S. and others are clearly pointing out that these church people can say anything at Citizens of the US and if they want to speak in an official capacity for the church, that's fine too, but they should in no way be invited to the planning table with the joint chiefs the same way that PETA can stomp their feet all they want to but aren't actually involved with congress on how to tax meat products.

Strictly speaking, the university is a para-church body in the same way that evangelistic associations or other kinds of pan-evangelical organizations are.

Speaking of Jesus in this way may seem to make him merely one of many great men, exceptional but not superhuman, not the divine being he is believed by Christians to be; but however his person and nature are understood, I for one can not believe that even in him God acted in any way inconsistent with the same natural laws and operations by which he works today.

In the same way the church might have been spoken of as the «earnest of the kingdom.

The editors did not notice the extent to which these already existed, and that, in a way, they were speaking for what no longer was the «same» America, but one particular set of interests.

I assume othere feel the same way whom have not spoken up.

At the same time, however, Christian voices are discouraged from speaking in an explicitly Christian way to an increasingly secular elite culture.

In the same way, the New Testament discusses the Church in the light of what God has achieved through Jesus (for example, I Corinthians 3:10 - 15, Ephesians 2:11 - 22); conversely, it speaks of God and Christ in the light of what the community has experienced (for instance, Romans 1:1 - ff, Hebrews 2: 10 - 18).