Sentences with phrase «same way you talk»

Frankly, you should want more men discussing hiring of women in the same way they talk about the hiring of men.

Only if he plays the same way he talk we should become champions.Bale can talk and he can prove it, he is a world class player, Wiltshire in another hand is.......

It may seem strange to talk about a chunk of computer code in the same way you talk about a cherry tree or a dolphin.

Give micro-niche sites a try and you'll soon be talking about big generic hookup sites the same way you talk about going to bars and clubs from the past!

So in the same way we talk about «flipping the classroom,» we must talk about «flipping the curriculum.»

I spell stuff wrong, I write the same way I talk.

If left 4 dead was on ps3 then people would play it and alot of people would talk the same way they talk in uncharted 2 cause almost everyone has mics in that game.

I wanted to talk about videogames the same way we talk about other parts of creative culture: how they affect us, how some parts of them endure for decades, how they are made and why we should care, who actually made them and for what reason, and what they had to go through to do so.

Not exact matches

And I think the subject that I would talk about mostly is a level of compassion and empathy that we need to try to recognize that the only way our society and the promise of America and the American dream can continue to exist is to ensure the fact that those people who were at the lower end have the same opportunity that people have with the right ZIP code in America.

If it goes the same way as the recently concluded Let's Talk TV review, there could be radical changes in store for internet service in Canada.

Fortunately, there may be a relatively simple way to alleviate much of this anxiety: Talk to yourself like you'd talk to someone else in the same situatTalk to yourself like you'd talk to someone else in the same situattalk to someone else in the same situation.

Bassi notes that she has talked with many Whole Foods employees, and when she asks them what it's like to have a job there, they invariably respond the same way: «with gushing enthusiasm.»

HTC says the U11 will work with Alexa the same way an Echo does — just say the wake word, and you can talk to it.

When you're talking expectations, it's especially important to make sure everyone's on the same page, so ask for confirmation by way of a follow - up question.

OpenFin hosts more than a hundred applications on its platform, and the integration means Symphony will be «interoperable» with those apps, the same way social media apps on your phone are able to talk with one another.

«We need to start talking to each other instead of at each other, and see if we can't resolve this in the same way that we did 10 years ago when Republicans had genuine provocation,» McConnell said.

Chatbots are pretty primitive, and so far not many people seem to talk to Siri, Alexa, Google, or any robot quite the same way they'd talk to a person.

The investment management pros I talk to are all feeling the same way each time they lighten up on stocks — now what do I do?

In the same way, choose the sites and portals where the product is being talked about.

But I gave him my pep talk by saying, «Look at it this way — You just made ten years of contributions at more or less the same average share price.

And over time as I myself have grown over the past five years, the blog has also kind of shifted so while that ruthless prioritization is still a major theme, I now also talk a lot about how that same concept applies to the way the way that you spend your time and energy.

The book is about what I believe is the only way to get rich in the stock market through three core ideas and some of the same stock market basics we talk about on the blog.

If, according to her, her «down syndrome» baby is god's gift, and is normal in God's point of view, then why do we see her hatred and vitriole, when she talks about the same god - created individuals, who are also normal, but in a bit different way?

Much as religious types like to talk out of both sides of their mouths at the same time, you don't get to have it both ways.

See, try to run for president, and talk about faith and prayer in the same way that Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich do.

But when we use those words, we don't mean them in the same way we mean them when we're talking about God.

This hostility, shut her up, everything she said is wrong is the same exact treatment I received for years when trying to have a «generative friendship, authentic community, relational generative orthodoxy» from my view they talk it but they in no way walk it.

It is difficult to listen to a text when there are other texts in the room talking about the same subject matter, often in ways more elaborate and more familiar.

Some people seem to want to do very little, for fear of antagonising Muslim extremists, while others talk of a «war on terror» as a way of eliminating these same extremists.

And, tragically, the proponents of violence always talk the same way.

In the same way the double - minded talk that is from time to time addressed to the sufferer may be recognized by the fact that it puts its trust in the things of this world.

First, David could be saying that since he was born as a human, he learned to sin, in the same way that infants and toddlers learn to talk.

We prefer it merely out of habit, and because human relations work more smoothly when everybody talks the same way.

So, for example, if your hear a pastor saying, «You have to take up your cross daily and follow Jesus in order to go to heaven when you die,» you can look in the text he is preaching from (maybe Matthew 16:24 - 26 or Luke 9:23 - 26), and see that Jesus is talking about saving your life (which is NOT the same thing as receiving eternal life) by living in a profitable way here on earth (cf. Luke 9:24 - 25).

This situation could easily be dismissed as the ravings of a few neurotic sociopaths, except for the chilling fact that our President and many of his advisors talk in much the same way.

either way, we're not talking about the same thing.

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

It is refreshing in an age when Richard Rorty and his followers have told us that we can not speak this way to hear a philosopher doing so, but, at the same time, it is hard to know what to make of such talk in the light of Taylor's other claims.

We talked that day about growing up as Christians sort of the same way kids grow up — you'd never expect a five year old to act the same way as a twelve year old or as a twenty year old, but sometimes we expect our Christian lives to be quite static, and quite similar to one another.

and also if i have and your answer is yes then if there is a way to get the holy spirit back then please tell me and also please pray for me for a few days and i also want to know that really is the unforgivable sin unforgivable and really i swear on my mother that i don't want to go to hell forever and i am very scared of it please help me urgent and also i am sending a friend request to you on facebook and please accept it so that we can talk on this matter together and also i think you will like my page and i couldn't sleep properly because of this and in my half sleep in my dreams i was just visiting your website and finding my comment missing and i as pleasing god and the holy spirit but as i was receiving my spirit again and again as i mentioned this in my previous comment i was abusing in my mind i couldn't stop abusing and i have a very good mother she tried to wake me but i told her not to do and it was happening same things again and again and i told my mother again the half truth because i don't want to break her heart and she told me that there is nothing like ghosts and they are making me fools (you all) and i am telling you honestly before this i irritate my mother a lot i just watch tv and surf the internet or play games in my pc and i eat and brush late and also don't listen to my parents but after i saw your website i became obedient for a few days and again the same i am disobedient your webpage or article ruined my life but this is not your fault and now days i am buy searching about this topic and my father (Vivek Saraf) broke his hands on the 6th May while riding at a very high speed he normally don't go at a very high speed but he had a very important work so whole he was riding a dog was running on the way and to save his life he gave a very hard brake and he with his nebiour fall down and got injuries in his legs and broke his hands and at first he walked with difficulty and then the local people helped him on his way and took him to the local hospital but the doctor told that we need to go to Kollkata (the capital of west bengal, India) and so he went with his loyal staff because he is a business man and in the hospital he got cured but he still have the fracture in his hands so i request you to pray for him and his negibour also and i will tell you the rest in facebook bye and sorry for spelling mistakes in my previous comments.

In a way, both Marxists and Christians are talking about the same thing: actual human being in the real world and society.

In talking about God with images we do not say that God is such and such, we say that God is like such and such (the same way that Jesus spoke about the Kingdom of God in his parables).

These may be valid, considering his prestige and experience, but they don't satisfy me as to what the clergy of today need to emphasize and reintroduce — in the same forceful way Rev. Sam Shoemaker introduced them in the 1930's in his books, sermons, talks, and work with Bill Wilson.

Please, next time you talk to God, tell Him that I am open to His instruction and correction, and that anytime He wants to correct my theology, He can come speak to me the same way He speaks to you.

James and John have no idea what they are talking about, but the Lord does ask them to be baptized in the same way («baptizein» is Greek for «immerse»).

We don't approach it the same way; we don't talk about it the same way.

This site is obviously attractive to people who have had negative experiences and would like the freedom, for a change, to talk about it without being victimized all over again the same way they were in the sick system they left.

When I read the disciples accounts after they have met Jesus they all talk in the same way, longing for a home they do not yet have but living with this battle that rages within.

Highlights for me included: 1) Belcher's call in Chapter 3 to find common ground in classic / orthodox Christianity (the Apostle's Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed) which, if applied, would dramatically reduce some of the name - calling and accusations of heresy that have been most unhelpful in the discussion between the emerging and traditional camps, 2) Belcher's fabulous treatment of postmodernism and postfoundationalism in Chapter 4, where he rightly explains that when talking about postmodernism, folks in the emerging church and the traditional church are using the same term to refer to two completely different things, and where he concludes that «a third way rejects classical foundationalism and hard postmodernism,» and 3) Belcher's fair handling of the atonement issue in Chapter 6, in which he clarifies that most emergering church leaders «are not against atonement theories and justification, but want to see it balanced with the message of the kingdom of God.»

But if he were to sit down and talk with me and my wife, or with almost anyone who is on this same journey with God, I think he would discover that we are not falling away from God, but are drawing closer to Him and His people in ways that we never before thought possible — in ways we had only dreamed of when we were part of the institutional church.