Not exact matches
To add to the tragedy, imagine new local directories fetching the
same old data, multiplying
wrong, outdated
information in several local directories.
The
same other parents also complained for this
wrong information.
But forest scientists who were cited in the
same section of the IPCC report have come to the defense of the 40 % statement, and it appears the error is one of citing the
wrong references for the right
information.
I haven't read all the
information and may be completely
wrong, but my understanding is that Macmillan are doing the exact
same thing and setting * their * price.
, and YES i am 100 % POSITIVE i am entering the
information correct, it is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE that i've entered it
wrong now 10 times when retrying, i KNOW the info and it is the
SAME info i used the other day when it gave me a date, now i get THAT message, is something
wrong with the website?
Can you believe that this rep told me that he didn't have a Director and that he could only transfer me back to the
same supervisor I spoke with 3 months ago that gave me
wrong information.
Therefore unless you get all your quotes at the
same time, you don't have accurate
information and may end up going with the
wrong company.
The things that could go
wrong on your credit history are as simple as someone inputting the
wrong information or someone with the
same first and last name having their credit histories combined with yours.
But there are so many things we are guilty of doing
wrong, so many ways that we forget that even the most well - intentioned adopters do not have the
same library of animal care
information in their heads as we do.
About a year ago I recklessly announced on Slashdot * that I was so fed up with seeing the
same misinformation and misunderstandings repeated ad nauseam that I'd take on the job of collating a FAQ page listing the most common such myths and misunderstandings, along with brief summaries of why and how they're
wrong and links to further
information.
No Bartemis you are dead
wrong when you state: «the rate of change and the absolute concentration provide the
same information»... The integration constant is arbitrary, and requires additional
information / data to set it's value.
This is the
same person who endorses Anthony Watts, who has published way more confusing and
wrong information than Gore.
For your
information, the
same can appear in
wrong language and country or region settings.
Do not use the
same cover letter for all the job, go through the job description and customize the cover letter accordingly but at the
same time, do not write
wrong information on the cover letter.
In addition, the FTC charged that the company, «failed to follow reasonable procedures to prevent the
same criminal offense
information from being included in a consumer report multiple times, failed to follow reasonable procedures to prevent obviously inaccurate consumer report
information from being provided to employers, and in numerous cases even included the records of the
wrong person.»
Among other things, HireRight was accused of failing to ensure that
information in background reports was current and reflected updates, failing to prevent the
same criminal offense
information from being included in a report multiple times, and in numerous cases even including the records of the
wrong person in reports.
I do not think that the
information is
wrong as much as I don't want to see the exact
same resume layo
Not that one would necessarily be right and another
wrong, but it would be very interesting to see different takes on the
same information.
In following this discussion about publishing sold prices I keep coming back to the
same question: «what exactly is
wrong with offering homeowners, buyers, investors, renters etc. easy online access to property
information such as is the case with the viewpoint site?»