The sample size variation was due to a disparity in subject recruitment between the schools.
Not exact matches
Because there's significant microbiome
variation within C - section and vaginal birth groups, a small
sample size makes it especially difficult to catch enduring microbiome changes.
As UPC Prof at ICFO Juan P. Torres states, «any slight refractive index change introduced by an impurity in the
sample is translated into a phase difference and thus an intensity
variation in the pattern, showing the contours and therefore
size of the irregularity.»
A Commentary article in the same issue of The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology by Harvard Professor Matthew W. Gillman notes that the study had a large
sample size, reasonably precise information about the timing of the famine, geographical
variation in the same country, and clinical outcomes — a combination of strengths missing in other famine studies.
Sample sizes do not permit rigorous intragroup comparisons, but Neandertal molar tissue proportions evince less variation than the modern human s
Sample sizes do not permit rigorous intragroup comparisons, but Neandertal molar tissue proportions evince less
variation than the modern human
samplesample.
This aspect must be evaluated in association with the pronounced body -
size variation within the
sample, which implies marked differences between age ranges and a considerable degree of sexual dimorphism in Au.
Garamszegi, L. Z. & Møller, A. P. Effects of
sample size and intraspecific
variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta - analytic review.
Using large - scale empirical and simulated data sets, we found that the
sample sizes used in the HapMap project are sufficient to capture common
variation, but that performance declines substantially for variants with minor allele frequencies of < 5 %.
(Our
sample size allowed us to identify how much
variation in achievement was associated with textbooks, but not necessarily to evaluate the effectiveness of each textbook individually.
«The beauty of a meta - analysis is that you can look at all of the existing studies and calculate the strength of the relationship between one variable and another, taking into account
variations in
sample size, region of a country, quality of the study, and other factors,» Hill says.
Among median -
size schools in North Carolina, roughly half of the variance between schools in value - added in 4th grade math and reading was due to
sampling variation and other one - time factors.
We
sampled districts to achieve
variation in
size and demographic diversity.
As with the cases discussed above, the differences could come from
variations in teachers» true value - added across student groups or from measurement error enhanced by the small
sample size.
Out of that pool of
variation, which is getting to be a significant
sample size, comes this one video that manages to land on a simple concept that plays to the strengths of the film medium — namely that it is visual.
However, the small
sample size, lack of randomization, wide
variation in children served, and the lack of objectively assessed changes in child behavior limit the reported results.
This
variation, along with the
sample size for each model, will be taken into account in the final analysis.
Limitations include lack of a non-maltreated or child welfare services involved comparison group, possible
sample collection time
variation, and small
sample size.
With regard to the
sample size required for valid application of this modeling approach, we are hesitant to speak of sufficient
sample sizes, since a large number of observations with little score
variation over time (as in our second empirical application) does not necessarily provide richer information than a smaller
sample with more fluctuations.
The distribution of effect
sizes should be shaped as a funnel if no publication bias is present, since the more numerous studies with small
sample sizes are expected to show a larger
variation in the magnitude of effect
sizes than the less numerous studies with large effect
sizes.
In our meta - analytic model, three forms of variance were taken into account: random
sampling variation of observed effect
sizes (level 1), variance within studies (level 2), and variance between studies (level 3)(Cheung 2014; Hox 2002; Van den Noortgate et al. 2013, 2014).