Sentences with phrase «samples of breath by»

Not exact matches

Their results showed methadone was present in all samples using both methods, but when using the method based on impaction, the concentration of methadone in exhaled breath was less than one per cent of the concentration collected by the method based on filtration.

A similar principle is used in the medical field to detect biomarkers for different kinds of health conditions, including cancer, by taking breath samples.

After analyzing biomarkers in the breath samples of 60 patients, the scientists found a link between bacterial pneumonia and the presence of certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by a pathogen called A. baumannii.

Multiple studies have proven that dogs are able to detect certain cancers by smelling the breath or urine samples of those afflicted with the disease.

In a research study conducted by the Pine Street Foundation, breath samples of 31 breast cancer patients, 55 lung cancer patients and 83 healthy people were presented to five trained scent dogs (three Labrador retrievers and two Portuguese water dogs).

The charge of «refusal» or «failure to provide a sample» means that when demanded by a police officer, either at the roadside or at the police station (or R.I.D.E. truck) to provide a breath sample, you «refused».

The driver only gave one breath sample and was served a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the officer.

The breath samples were taken 12 minutes apart and there was no evidence of vomiting or recent vomiting discussed in the police report filed by the officer.

Officer Chan thereafter arrived on scene and according to the police report filed (in support of the IRP driving prohibition) by Officer Roberts, Officer Chan read to JXW a legal breath demand, explained and demonstrated to JXW how to provide a proper breath sample and later informed JXW what the consequences of failing or refusing to provide a proper sample would be.

Only the breath samples taken at the police station can be used by the Crown as accurate measurements of your actual blood alcohol content (BAC).

By informing the arresting officer that he was refusing to provide samples of his breath before the final demand was made he was, to use the words in Prosper, doing something which suggested he had changed his mind and no longer wished to speak to a lawyer.

(b) in respect of a 90 - day driving prohibition resulting from a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device and the approved screening device registering a fail,

«I am not satisfied that you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide a sample of breath for analysis by means of an ASD.

«I note that the charge indicated on the Notice was for failing to comply with a demand to provide a sample of breath for analysis by an ASD.

The basis of this charge is that someone (who is usually a driver) was requested by a peace officer to provide a sample of their breath or sample of their blood but that that person unreasonably failed or refused to provide breath samples to the police.

If you were stopped for suspicion of a NJ DWI offense, it is more likely than not, that you were asked to submit to a breath sample by blowing into a breath test machine or breathalyzer (a.k.a. the Alcotest) that measures blood alcohol concentration («BAC»).

New Jersey requires that all applicants for a driver's license consent to provide a breath sample upon request by a police officer as a implied condition of the privilege to operate a motor vehicle.

The petitions of Robert Goodwin and Kenneth Thorne, who had been prohibited from driving for failing to provide breath samples into an ASD, were heard separately by Mr. Justice Dley who dismissed both petitions.

The motorists had each been given driving prohibitions by peace officers after they had either refused to supply a sample of breath, or having supplied a sample, registered a «fail» on an «approved screening device» («ASD») as described in the Criminal Code and the MVA.

Mr. Jackson provides a roadside sample of his breath to enable its analysis by means of an approved screening device («ASD»).

[1] Mr. Boyes is charged with three offences, alleged to have been committed in the early morning hours of September 22, 2012: (i) dangerous driving, contrary to section 249 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code; (ii) failing to stop when pursued by police officer, contrary to section 249.1 (1) of the Criminal Code; and (iii) failing to comply with demand for a breath sample which was made to him under section 254 of the Criminal Code.

If a driver is stopped by police who suspect him of being under the influence of alcohol, they will ask him to provide a «screening» sample of breath.

Mr. Duncan also demonstrated to the Crown specifically where the officer's credibility would be both challenged, and likely criticized by the Court, and was able to show the Crown that the Court would likely exclude the evidence of the samples of breath, thus leading to the failure of the «over 08» charge.

Client stopped by police officer who demands Client supply a sample of breath into an Approved Screening Device (also known as an ASD, Roadside Screening Device or RSD).

A wet chemical device, on the other hand, measures alcohol in a breath sample by measuring the amount of the sample that reacts with chromate salts, which will react to alcohol but not to most other substances commonly found in human breath.

Div 1989), which covers the number of breath samples and consistency between the samples, all of which is required by New Jersey law.