Sentences with phrase «samples of breath which»

He demonstrated to the accused how to provide a breath sample into the approved screening device, which the officer had in his cruiser, and at 2:20 a.m. the accused provided a sample of his breath which registered a fail, signifying to the officer that the accused's blood alcohol concentration was in excess of 100 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood, due to what he believed to be the calibration of the approved screening device.

Not exact matches

The researchers have developed a small array of flexible sensors, which accurately detect compounds in breath samples that are specific to ovarian cancer.

Called «C.A.T.C.H. the Virus,» which stands for Characterizing and Tracking College Health, the study traces the trajectory of viral infections using blood samples, nasal swabs and breath samples from ailing freshmen and their closest contacts.

Diagnosing SIBO involves a hydrogen breath test, which has the patient ingesting sugar solutions and giving breath samples over a period of several hours.

Options include breath testing, skin pinprick, a stomach gastroscopy, an intestinal biopsy, stool analysis, skin sample analysis, electrical current testing, muscle testing methods, and more — and there is lots of controversy in the medical and nutrition community about which test is best.

9 The accused was turned over to Constable S. a qualified breathalyzer technician and provided two samples of his breath directly into an approved instrument at 3:13 a.m. and 3:34 a.m. respectively, both of which exceeded 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.

In the first case, Justice Craig Parry excluded breath samples from the driver's trial due to a Charter breach, which resulted in a charge of driving with a blood - alcohol content above the legal limit to be dismissed.

By informing the arresting officer that he was refusing to provide samples of his breath before the final demand was made he was, to use the words in Prosper, doing something which suggested he had changed his mind and no longer wished to speak to a lawyer.

Ridge, [1997] O.J. No. 1804 (Prov Div): 2 Defence counsel argues that Constable Archambault proffered false or misleading advice to the accused, indicating that a fail on the roadside would be the same as a refusal to provide a sample, and, further, that this false advice was in the nature of legal advice given in a situation where Mr. Ridge did not have the right to counsel and which misled Mr. Ridge into refusing to provide a breath sample.

The officers administered a breath sample test which showed readings of 195 and 193, which were double the legal allowable level.

Client received a 90 - day Immediate Roadside Prohibition after providing two breath samples using Approved Screening Devices, both of which registered «fail» readings.

Client providing two breath samples using Approved Screening Devices, both of which registered «fail» readings.

Client received a 90 - day Immediate Roadside Prohibition after providing two breath samples using Approved Screening Devices, both of which registered as «Fail» readings.

Client received a 90 - day Immediate Roadside Prohibition after providing two breath samples using an Approved Screening Device, both of which registered as «Fail» readings.

Div 1989), for information concerning the number of breath samples and consistency between the samples, which is required under the law of New Jersey.

Because of the concerns about the frequently tragic results of impaired driving shared throughout Canadian society, Parliament has decreed that failing to provide a breath sample as demanded either at the roadside and / or for the purposes of the Intoxilyzer device, is also a criminal offence, to be punished in the same way as blowing a sample which is «over 80».

A judge has acquitted a man of failing to provide a breath sample, rebuking Toronto police officers» «aggressive» and «verbally abusive» conduct following a simple traffic stop, which included telling the man he needed to exit his car because he had come to a «high drug» area.

[1] Mr. Boyes is charged with three offences, alleged to have been committed in the early morning hours of September 22, 2012: (i) dangerous driving, contrary to section 249 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code; (ii) failing to stop when pursued by police officer, contrary to section 249.1 (1) of the Criminal Code; and (iii) failing to comply with demand for a breath sample which was made to him under section 254 of the Criminal Code.

A doctor who had treated the accused following a motor vehicle accident told a police officer that the accused's breath smelled of alcohol, following which the police obtained an warrant to seize a blood sample.

Police officer demanded a sample of breath into an Approved Screening Device (also known as an «ASD») which registered a «fail».

While there, the Client supplied two more samples of breath into the BAC Datamaster C instrument, each registering 120, which is 40 miligrams OVER the legal limit.

A wet chemical device, on the other hand, measures alcohol in a breath sample by measuring the amount of the sample that reacts with chromate salts, which will react to alcohol but not to most other substances commonly found in human breath.

Client gave samples of breath into an «Approved Screening Device» (or «ASD» or «RSD» or «Roadside Screening Device» which registered a FAIL.

Div 1989), which covers the number of breath samples and consistency between the samples, all of which is required by New Jersey law.