The functional brain networks showed a clear small - world organization for 0.3 ≤
T ≤ 0.5 (Fig. 1a — d), expressed by L ≈ Lrandom and λ ≈ 1 for T ≤ 0.5 and C ≫ Crandom and γ ≫ 1 for T ≥ 0.3 (one - sample t test, all p < α of 0.01, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons of T, df = 18), indicating a small - world organization (Sporns et al., 2004; Stam, 2004; Achard et al., 2006; van den Heuvel et al., 2008b)
T ≤ 0.5 (Fig. 1a — d), expressed by L ≈ Lrandom and λ ≈ 1 for
T ≤ 0.5 and C ≫ Crandom and γ ≫ 1 for T ≥ 0.3 (one - sample t test, all p < α of 0.01, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons of T, df = 18), indicating a small - world organization (Sporns et al., 2004; Stam, 2004; Achard et al., 2006; van den Heuvel et al., 2008b)
T ≤ 0.5 and C ≫ Crandom and γ ≫ 1 for
T ≥ 0.3 (one - sample t test, all p < α of 0.01, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons of T, df = 18), indicating a small - world organization (Sporns et al., 2004; Stam, 2004; Achard et al., 2006; van den Heuvel et al., 2008b)
T ≥ 0.3 (one -
sample t test, all p < α of 0.01, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons of T, df = 18), indicating a small - world organization (Sporns et al., 2004; Stam, 2004; Achard et al., 2006; van den Heuvel et al., 2008b)
t test, all p < α of 0.01, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons of
T, df = 18), indicating a small - world organization (Sporns et al., 2004; Stam, 2004; Achard et al., 2006; van den Heuvel et al., 2008b)
T, df = 18),
indicating a small - world organization (Sporns et al., 2004; Stam, 2004; Achard et al., 2006; van den Heuvel et al., 2008b).