Labour's Jim Murphy and the Conservatives» Ruth Davidson clashed over targets for
sanctioning people on benefits.
Not exact matches
More
people could be pushed into Britain's informal economy because of new government
sanctions imposed
on benefit claimants, a think - tank has claimed.
The Tory Work and Pensions secretary said 75 % of
people who have had their
benefits stopped under his department's cruel
sanctions regime said it helped them «focus and get
on.»
Chief executive Paul Farmer said: «The government has proposed to
sanction anyone turning down «reasonable offers of employment», but
people should not be forced to accept work that risks damaging their mental health, putting them back
on benefits and back at square one.
«The government's rhetoric
on draconian
benefits sanctions completely ignores the real problems stopping
people holding down regular work,» he said.
Official figures in the first quarter of 2014 found a huge increase in
sanctions against
people reliant
on ESA sickness
benefit.
Previously, a
person on public assistance who missed work could be subject to an automated, computerized
sanction, that could lead to the suspension of
benefits for six months.
While backtracking
on using the term, the Democratic gubernatorial candidate said she will continue to emphasize that
people of color who've been unjustly punished by anti-drug laws should
benefit from the government's
sanctioning of weed.
The central question was whether the wife of a
person subject to the
sanctions regime was required to obtain a licence from HM Treasury and comply with strict requirements before using state
benefits —
on the basis that the funds might «
benefit» the listed
person (her husband).