A few years back I wrote about plans for the Murphy Oil Refinery in northeastern Wisconsin to expand operations 700 %, to take advantage of tar
sands oil piped in from Canada.
Not exact matches
Transporting
sand, drilling
pipe, and crude
oil furnished only 4.5 % of UP's volumes at the peak in 2014.
A: The
pipe dreams of eight million barrels of
oil a day from the
oil sands are almost certainly never going to be achieved.
House Speaker John Boehner, R - Ohio, appealed to Obama to approve the $ 8 billion project, which would
pipe oil from the Canadian tar
sands to U.S. refineries on the Gulf Coast.
There it would link to existing
pipes, to carry
oil from Canada's tar
sands to refineries on the US's Gulf of Mexico coast.
Photo: Joshua White, 2013; Donald Judd, untitled, 1962, Cadmium red
oil, wax, and
sand on canvas and wood, and black enamel on asphalt
pipe, 50 1/2 x 45 x 9 5/8 in.
The bill, which was prompted by an application from Enbridge
Oil to pipe oil from Alberta's tar sands region to Montreal refineries, and then through Vermont's Northeast Kingdom on its way to Portland, Maine, is now on its way through the Vermont House, where it is expected to be passed with flying colou
Oil to
pipe oil from Alberta's tar sands region to Montreal refineries, and then through Vermont's Northeast Kingdom on its way to Portland, Maine, is now on its way through the Vermont House, where it is expected to be passed with flying colou
oil from Alberta's tar
sands region to Montreal refineries, and then through Vermont's Northeast Kingdom on its way to Portland, Maine, is now on its way through the Vermont House, where it is expected to be passed with flying colours.
As we debate our entire national commitment to climate change action through the proxy of an
oil sands pipeline project or two, we should remember every one of us has had a hand in getting the bitumen into that
pipe.
What this spill revealed was that no one knew the impact of pushing bitumen, unrefined tar
sands oil, through
pipes regulated for conventional
oil.
The
pipe would send hundreds of thousands of barrels of
oil sands bitumen from Edmonton to the port of Vancouver each day — this at a moment when
oil sands production and the pipelines that move it have become the proxy for a debate about climate change and the fossil fuel industries not just across Canada but worldwide.
With the proposed Keystone XL tar
sands pipeline in the middle of its environmental impact assessment by the U.S. State Department, getting a better understanding of what raw tar
sands oil in a
pipe means for our environment and safety is more important than ever.
He promises to ask Trans - Canada to re-apply for its permit for the rejected Keystone Pipeline, which proposed to move tar
sands oil in massive
pipes through the Midwest down to the Gulf Coast, and he supports drilling off the Atlantic coast, which was halted by the Obama Administration earlier this year.
If the
oil industry wants to
pipe these dangerous tar
sands oils over our water sheds and aquifers, putting our drinking supply and neighborhoods at risk, they should not only be required to pay into the cleanup fund, they should be paying far more than the 8 cents per barrel they pay for conventional
oil since these tar
sands oils are not just worse for the environment, but potentially pose a greater risk of spills and are even harder to clean up.
The gut - check issue for McKibben and his supporters — thousands of whom turned out for a mass demonstration in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 17 — is the Keystone XL pipeline, a 3,400 - mile
pipe proposed by
oil infrastructure company TransCanada that will allow crude
oil extracted from the tar
sands of Alberta, in southern Canada, to be refined on the Gulf of Mexico.