bitumen is not considered crude oil, and therefore tar
sands pipeline operators like Exxon aren't required to pay into the oil spill cleanup fund
Here's the tweet from @exxonmobil sent in response to critics who pointed out that, because of a major loophole that needs to be closed, bitumen is not considered crude oil, and therefore tar
sands pipeline operators like Exxon aren't required to pay into the oil spill cleanup fund.
Not exact matches
The company, Canada's No. 2
pipeline operator, released a letter sent to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and other department officials saying that increased carbon levies for Alberta oil
sands producers and new Canadian targets for greenhouse - gas emission cuts should serve to help assuage U.S. concerns that approving the C$ 8 billion ($ 6.41 billion) project would increase climate change.
According to a thirty - year - old law in the US, diluted bitumen coming from the Alberta tar
sands is not classified as oil, meaning
pipeline operators planning to transport the corrosive substance across the US — with proposed
pipelines like the Keystone XL — are exempt from paying into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.
According to a thirty - year - old law in the US, diluted bitumen coming from the Alberta tar
sands is not classified as oil, meaning
pipeline operators planning to transport tar
sands crude across the United States are exempt from paying into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.
We ensure that never again can a company like BP take a tax deduction for money spent cleaning up its own mess in the Gulf of Mexico, and we close the loophole that lets tar
sands oil
pipeline operators avoid paying the oil spill cleanup tax.»