i.e. this has potential to improve
satellite sea level measurements.
And I'm not talking about
satellite sea level measurements.
Not exact matches
Even then, many experts disputed this, and
satellite measurements have since shown the two sheets are already losing enough ice to raise
sea level by 1.3 millimetres a year and climbing.
While
satellites have provided consistently good data for years, the next frontier in
sea level rise
measurement is a new type of radar that can capture a more crisp, higher - resolution picture of
sea surface heights.
In addition, GOCE data could be used to help validate
satellite altimetry
measurements for an even clearer understanding of ice - sheet and
sea -
level change.
«Virtual contact lenses for radar
satellites: Algorithm improves
sea level measurements.»
Described in a research paper published in the journal «Geophysical Research Letters», the «smoke rings» were discovered by analysing
sea level measurements taken from
satellites together with
sea surface temperature images from the same time and place.
New
measurements from a NASA
satellite have allowed researchers to identify and quantify, for the first time, how climate - driven increases of liquid water storage on land have affected the rate of
sea level rise.
Thanks in large part to
satellite measurements, scientists» skill in measuring how much
sea levels are rising on a global scale - currently 0.13 inch (3.4 millimeters) per year - has improved dramatically over the past quarter century.
This is based on the following graph showing
satellite measurements of
sea levels over 2010:
Has realclimate ever done (or considered doing) an entry about the immense contribution that
satellite measurements have made in the past two - three decades, in helping us to understand various components of the earth system (e.g., vegetation, ozone, ice sheet mass, water vapor content, temperature,
sea level height, storms, aerosols, etc.)?
Modern tide gauge and
satellite measurements indicate that
sea level rise has accelerated further within the 20th Century.
Hatun et al. also used altimeter data (local
sea level height
measurements from
satellite observations) to diagnose the norther oceans gyre circulation.
The issues relating to
sea level rise and the global water budget can only be addressed when the record of
satellite gravity
measurement from GRACE achieves adequate duration.
Given all the independent lines of evidence pointing to average surface warming over the last few decades (
satellite measurements, ocean temperatures,
sea -
level rise, retreating glaciers, phenological changes, shifts in the ranges of temperature - sensitive species), it is highly implausible that it would lead to more than very minor refinements to the current overall picture.
== Post # 65 by Dan: == ==» The warming trends are shown by ocean temperatures,
sea -
level rise, glacier retreats,
satellite measurements, etc..
The warming trends are shown by ocean temperatures,
sea -
level rise, glacier retreats,
satellite measurements, etc..
ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2008)-- Arctic
sea ice extent during the 2008 melt season dropped to the second - lowest
level since
satellite measurements began in 1979, reaching the lowest point in its annual cycle of melt and growth on Sept. 14, according to researchers at the University of Colorado at Boulder's National Snow and Ice Data Center.»
At the same time, the GRACE gravitational - anomaly
satellites, the most accurate method of
measurement we have, showed
sea level actually falling from 2003 — 2009.
All of the different
satellite measurements agree with that, but perhaps even more interesting is that the European RSL
measurement shows that the
sea level in 2011 was even lower than it was back in 2005.
Core samples, tide gauge readings, and, most recently,
satellite measurements tell us that over the past century, the Global Mean
Sea Level (GMSL) has risen by 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 centimeters).
Measurements of present - day
sea level change rely on two different techniques: tide gauges and
satellite altimetry (Section 5.5.2).
Lower troposphere temperature data represents the temperature of the atmosphere at approximately 3000 meters above
sea level, as determined by
satellite measurements.
How accurate or valuable are
satellite measurements of
sea -
level rise?
The primary danger from global warming was supposed to be the
sea level rise from melting ice caps but this hasn't occurred either and
satellite measurements show that the rate of
sea level rise has in fact decreased in 2004 to 0.37 mm / year in the Atlantic and 0.15 mm / year in the Pacific.
Some researchers have argued that the higher trends from the
satellite measurements proves that there has been an «acceleration» in
sea level rise, e.g., Church & White, 2006 (Abstract; Google Scholar access) or Cazenabe & Nerem, 2004 (Abstract; Google Scholar access).
As a result,
satellite estimates of
sea levels involve the use of complex models, approximations, other
measurements and calculations.
In 2009, Arctic
sea ice extent hit its 3rd lowest
level since
satellite measurements began in 1979.
Based on surface temperature
measurements,
satellites, glacial retreat,
sea level rise, decrease in snow - cover in spring & fall, etc. etc..
Data from
satellite measurements show that
sea levels have increased by about three inches on average worldwide since 1992 suggesting that
sea levels are rising more quickly than anticipated and faster than they did 50 years ago.
Paper J notes that the anthropogenic effect on
sea level rise in one region of the world (the Pacific Ocean) over one period of time (1993 - 2013) is too small to detect at a statistically significant
level due to factors such as: a) small sample size (only 20 years), b) the effect of control variables (such as the IPO), c) limitations of
satellite altimetry
measurement, the technique being used to measure
sea level in paper H. Paper K offers a contrasting account of paper J, noting that part of the Pacific
sea level rise is anthropogenic.
Global average
sea levels have risen by around 3.2 mm per year since
satellite measurements began in 1993, the report says, with
sea levels around 67 mm higher in 2014 than they were in 1993.
Now, as you say, there are all sorts of problems with the historical records of
sea level but — just as with temperatures — it is likely that
measurements from the
satellites will be more accurate and less prone to random variation and sampling error than
measurements from ground based sensors.
Many more flawed or misleading presentations of Global Warming science exist in the book, including those on Arctic
sea ice thinning, correction of land - based temperature
measurements for the urban heat island effect,
satellite vs. ground - based
measurements of Earth's warming, and controversies over
sea level rise estimates.
Observed
sea level rise since 1970 from tide gauge data (red) and
satellite measurements (blue) compared to model projections for 1990 - 2010 from the IPCC Third Assessment Report (grey band).
No mention that the acceleretion of
sea level rise happen same time as the change to
satellite measurements.
The data cited is
satellite altimeter
measurements of global mean
sea level over the past 16 years (Figure 1).
7:00 no
sea level rise in La Jolla, CA 12:00 Topex / Poseidon
Satellite measurements are crude 12:43 ENVISAT, European
satellite with higher resolution, much lower
sea level rise, decrease since 2010
NSIDC 5 day averaged Antarctic
sea ice extent is now at a record low
level for the date, since
satellite measurements began in 1979:
Both of the Nature Climate Change studies used a combination of direct
measurements of temperature at various depths, a
measurement of the altitude of the top of the ocean (
sea level) from highly accurate
satellite instruments, and measures of the mass of the water in the ocean, from the GRAIL gravity research project.
-- These two distinct
satellite systems, using very different
measurement methods, produced raw data reaching identical conclusions:
sea level is barely rising, if at all.
[5] From 1950 to 2009,
measurements show an average annual rise in
sea level of 1.7 ± 0.3 mm per year, with
satellite data showing a rise of 3.3 ± 0.4 mm per year from 1993 to 2009, [6] a faster rate of increase than previously estimated.
A combination of 33 - year
satellite records,
measurements made over the past century, and long - term proxy analysis suggests Arctic
sea ice may be at its lowest
level for more than 1,000 years.
Steven, speaking of
satellites, how confident are you of their
sea level measurement with the accuracy under 1 mm?
They've used
satellite data,
sea level measurements, borehole analysis,
sea ice melt, permafrost melt, glacial melt, drought analysis, and on and on.
Arctic
sea ice during the 2007 melt season plummeted to the lowest
levels since
satellite measurements began in 1979.
Global
sea level keeps marching up at a rate of over 30 cm per century since 1992 (when global
measurements via altimetry on
satellites were made possible), and that is perhaps a better indicator that global warming continues unabated.
(Part of the How to Talk to a Global Warming Skeptic guide) Objection: According to the latest state - of - the - art
satellite measurements from over the Arctic,
sea levels are falling!
The barystatic
sea level rise, the actual increasing volume of the ocean, in particular, is masked from
measurements that are based on
satellite observations.
First, although there were no
satellite records, other studies have shown that Arctic
sea ice receded to a low in the 1930s and 1940s and then recovered again to a high
level by the late 1970s, when
satellite measurements began.