It also says this: «We have already identified over # 15 billion of
savings in government spending per year, vastly in excess of the # 5 billion per year that we have set aside for additional spending commitments...» Given the above why are they so keen on implementing the «damaging tax on jobs»?
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes
in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24)
spending by the U.S. and other
governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost
savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign
government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The
government did pledge $ 47 billion to infrastructure
spending over the next 10 years and extended the accelerated capital cost allowance for manufactures — a tax relief program for investments
in new machinery and equipment — by two years, which means stock holders could get a boost if public companies are able to take advantage of this
spending and
savings.
Both identify about $ 1.2 trillion
in spending cuts to the day - to - day operating budgets of
government agencies, though Reid's proposal also counts an extra $ 1 trillion
in savings from winding down wars
in Iraq and Afghanistan.
«That's why we put forward a budget that speaks to strategic investments
in economic growth and job creation, while at the same time transforming
government by achieving our
savings targets and limiting program
spending growth to 1.1 per cent.»
For example, if you're looking to build a retirement
savings plan, the tool pulls
in your current
spending activity from your linked accounts, analyzes
government data on
spending patterns for people as they age, and then crunches the numbers to estimate your actual
spending in retirement.
The Chicago - style monetary plan described efforts to privatize industry, reign
in government spending to lower inflation, and to create a more active stock market financed by labor's own forced
savings in order to increase stock prices.
Despite our tough plans for cuts
in public
spending, we have stuck to the previous
Government's commitments on capital investment, apart from some small
savings made
in May.
This is the conclusion of my paper, Free Universities, that the
government's claim that «our student finance reforms will deliver
savings to help address the large Budget deficit we were left» was disingenuous at best and that
in fact the public
spending crisis was used as an excuse to private higher education.
Committee chair Margaret Hodge warned that the
spending review measures,
in a rush to find
savings, didn't include a proper assessment of the costs associated with «farming out» many of central
government's tasks.
Other county officials, including those working for County Executive Mike Hein, have complained that municipal
governments have
spent the Safety Net
savings, rather than pass them along to residents
in the form of lower property taxes.
State Director of Operations Howard Glaser threw some cold water on the prospect that the
Spending and
Government Efficiency Commission would produce any immediate
savings in time to avoid massive state worker layoffs.
Mr Powell, who was chief - of - staff to Tony Blair, throughout his 10 years
in Downing Street, explains that
in the final year of the Blair
government they tried to conduct a Fundamental
Savings Review (FSR), to cut out some of the extra waste which he says had «inevitably built up
in the years of increased public
spending».
Conceding once again that public
spending would have to be reined
in, Brown said the
government would raise tax «at the very top, cut costs... and make
savings where we know we can» to protect frontline services.
The Communities and Local
Government Minister was mentioned during Mr Osborne's Spending Review yesterday as «the model of lean government» for the savings he has managed in his d
Government Minister was mentioned during Mr Osborne's
Spending Review yesterday as «the model of lean
government» for the savings he has managed in his d
government» for the
savings he has managed
in his department.
But
in exchange, local
governments and school districts would have to stay within the state - imposed 2 percent cap on
spending growth as well as consolidate or share services
in long - term
savings plans approved by Albany.
Greater Manchester is looking for a deal with the
government over the full five years from the next
spending review (expected
in autumn 2015) covering significant blocks of funding where the region can keep
savings generated through reforms over the period — with an agreement sharing risk and reward.
At a glance: main
spending cuts - # 1.15 bn to go
in «discretionary»
spending areas across Whitehall - # 1.7 bn saved by stopping projects undertaken by the last
government - # 836m to be cut from the
government's business department - # 120m
savings from a recruitment freeze
in the civil service - # 600m cut from quangos - # 320m cut from the Child Trust Fund
In these times of austerity of course we need to cut our cloth on all
spending; however, the
government's proposals for the design and construction of future schools are far too restrictive with too much focus on short - term
savings.»
In the beginning, yes, you may spend more but with practice and discipline you'll be putting the interest on those savings in your pocket and not the government
In the beginning, yes, you may
spend more but with practice and discipline you'll be putting the interest on those
savings in your pocket and not the government
in your pocket and not the
governments.
In a cost - benefit analysis of the Liberal government's pension plan, the Conference Board says the increase in mandatory savings initially results in a period of reduced household spending as pension contributions lower family incom
In a cost - benefit analysis of the Liberal
government's pension plan, the Conference Board says the increase
in mandatory savings initially results in a period of reduced household spending as pension contributions lower family incom
in mandatory
savings initially results
in a period of reduced household spending as pension contributions lower family incom
in a period of reduced household
spending as pension contributions lower family income.
In February 2006, the federal
government reported a personal
savings rate of minus 0.5 percent, meaning Americans
spent all they earned and then some.
By comparison, the many
spending reductions and job cuts introduced by the Harper Conservatives will result
in about $ 12.5 billion
in savings for the
government in the current 2014 - 15 fiscal year.
Others view this issue more broadly: costs must be covered and
savings are
savings no matter where
in government they arise.20 This broader approach requires collecting data reflecting the effect of an intervention on all
government spending.
Mundine's main messages to the conference were around the coming Federal Budget, saying he was aiming to convince the
government not to make any overall cuts to Indigenous
spending in return for significant
savings to come from an «infrastructure audit» and
in cutting a swathe through red tape which he says is the «greatest challenge» to Indigenous health policy and services.
With not much on offer, the Health Minister made the understandable (but disappointing) decision not to attend the briefing, leaving Departmental Secretary Martin Bowles to outline the
Government's
spending and
savings measures
in the health portfolio.