Sentences with phrase «saw good evidence»

But it wasn't until the early 1990s that we actually saw good evidence of planets around other stars.

«It's awfully nice to see good evidence for another transiting planet instead of all false alarms,» says astronomer Timothy Brown of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.

«Despite all odds, we see the best evidence yet that low - mass stars are forming startlingly close to the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way,» said Farhad Yusef - Zadeh, an astronomer at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, and lead author on the paper.

At this point I see no good evidence to suggest that whey protein is «anti-cancerous».

But as a physicist I'm also trained to not jump to conclusions unless I have seen some good evidence.

A cursory review of the submissions so far show 13 submissions supportive of the IPCC, 23 critical, and 4 that focus only on one of the questions (Dixon on implementing IAC recommendations, more critical than not, Gruenier on consensus and does not see good evidence, Institute for Science and Society focused on Media reporting on AR5 — interesting read, and James Painter focus on communication re: uncertainty).

More importantly for me, I see good evidence that the aerosol negative forcing has been greatly overestimated:

«I don't see any good evidence that just shouting down opponents actually works».

Not exact matches

Further evidence of the decline can be seen in the decreasing rates of first - time patents since the 1980s, as well as increases in demand for professional licensing, which could further restrict new business opportunities by requiring expensive (and often unnecessary) credentials.

Our goal is to see which practices have some empirical evidence to back them up; that is, we want to ask which ones are evidence - based best practices.

Wired has a good roundup of the possibilities; some observers fear the company has no intention of reselling e-books, that it merely wants to block others from doing so, but intellectual property experts see no evidence of that.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein also says he has seen no evidence of good cause to fire Mueller.

She asked whether he has seen «any evidence of good cause» to fire Mueller.

Good evidence of this is the recent spate of infographics we've seen on social media and buyers.

Research findings from the Center for Talent Innovation, a New York - based think tank headed by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, found that having something inherently in common with the funder, decision maker or investor makes an enormous difference, since 56 percent of decision makers in the study did not value ideas they didn't personally see a need for, even when evidence suggests that it's a good, marketable idea.

Well the reason he was fired (as I see it) is because he openly admiited that he believes in fairy tales over evidence.

It's customary there for doctors when they see evidence of terminal cancer in a person, not to tell them the truth but to tell them that everything is okay because they feel that it's better to make the patient feel good and not upset.

If it makes you feel better to think of it as mother nature or the laws of physics, or whatever other way you prefer to look at it, what you're seeing is the evidence of God's work.

But you can't tell a person who heard god speak (or saw a leprauchaun or threw a penny in a well and had the wish come true) that they don'thave evidence.

There is no evidence of a god this side of the Big Bang; every thing we see has a pretty good scientific explanation based on evidence.

But there is evidence — beginning with Genesis 1, where we are told that God looked at the whole creation and saw that it was good — that biblical thinking is not nearly so anthropocentric as many interpreters of the Bible have supposed.

You are the best evidence I've seen in a while that Christianity is a fraud.

So rather than engaging with the mountains of evidence that I brought, because this situation was one of the most well - documented cases of institutional cover - up I have ever seen, ever, there was a complete refusal to engage with the evidence.

If God exists and is all good, we must have evidence that all of the evil we see are for a higher purpose.

As he researched these, the author began to see the powerful scientific evidence for creation as well as the evidence for the historical reliability of the Bible..

Present your evidence here and we'll see how well it holds up.

Okay I would like to see the evidence for that as well please.

As I have read, ruminated, and wrestled with this I see the trend of Original Sin — that compulsion to seek godliness on our terms & not God's — evidenced in the history of secular humanity and borne by believers, the faithful as well as heterodox, into the congregation.

The New Jerusalem, however, poses a problem: for, though it can certainly be seen as evidence for Chesterton's Zionism and for his appreciation of the «mystical as well as mysterious» dimension of the Jewish heritage, it also contains passages which explain why Gopnik perceives Chesterton's agreement with the Zionist's perception that «we are aliens here» in a sinister light.

i will tell you that the one thing that god gave us is the power of will or choice and that is why we can decide to do good or bad or follow him or not but the evidence of a true christian is that person life will change and not is a small way.my people open your eyes and do not be fools to believe that there is no god because you know in your own heart while you say it, deep inside you can see that a god do exist and i do not need to tell you that or prove it to you because you know it is true.unfortunately there are false preachers who do not teach the truth or a halph truth which has led millions down the wrong path and today we see the result of it everywhere.

Both my pastor and my best girl friend in high school told me that in Genesis — when Isaac chose Jacob as his favored son and commanded him not to marry a Canaanite woman — we see evidence of God's desire to protect a certain racial order.

In other words, you're doing a good job of showing that you've seen no evidence of God as you define God.

Some evidences of its coming we see about us in redeemed lives and in a better society; for others we must hopefully wait, labor, and pray.

As evidence Perreau - Saussine mentions the weighty influence of Cardinal Manning, who «saw papal infallibility as the way... to release the church from the grip» of secular statism, as well as the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.»

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

It was those who were good at building systems who built the most fantastic and lunatic systems, who scarfed up every odd or stray fact and fit it in, and found that in the fact they could fit in such odd or stray facts evidence that they had seen what lesser mortals couldn't, or wouldn't.

I throw a challenge to you guys, If the pastor got the courage to test his life without God to weigh the evidence of both world, why do nt you guys also try not for one year, just ONE WEEK a life with God by putting your trust in him, then you will be in a better position to see whether he really exist or NOT.

The very fact that AE says he «sees» evidence in his life is good.

Seeing sunshine and rain meted out to good and bad alike, they take this as evidence that God is unfair or indifferent.

Whatever is consisted with being an Atheist, i would like your community to provide us collaborating evidences that if we follow you that we will live in a better place with no wars and other bad things that we are seeing in this world.

Perhaps the best point to be made is that if I am wrong, and all the evidence that I have seen pointing to Jesus being my savior is wrong, then there is no consequence to me.

It is when i see religious people try to tell me that i m not good with out god, with no evidence that I object and speak up.

Specific hypotheses could perhaps be derived from the literature reflecting these various perspectives, and then evidence could be adduced to see whether one hypothesis made better sense than another.

Steve's point was to say one group does more good than another, for which I see no evidence at present.

Casey, I think the best evidence God doesn't condemn gay people is when Christ met the Roman Centurion and said of him, Never have I seen faith great than this.

Well, let's just see how well you can use your keen «reason» and «logic» to search for your «empirical evidence&raqWell, let's just see how well you can use your keen «reason» and «logic» to search for your «empirical evidence&raqwell you can use your keen «reason» and «logic» to search for your «empirical evidence».

From the evidence I have seen locals in their cultures are better suited to the task and the calling.

See the diffidence concerning the ability of modern knowledge of nature to be convincing evidence for God referred to in our review of Paul Haffner's quality book and our Cutting Edge column, as well its presence on our Letters» page.

We see ample evidence of such violence and domination by those who are «connected» in much of our world — by Afghan warlords as well as the tyrannical chair of the condo board.

No... I actually began questioning Christianity and all religions when I was in elementary school and in history class while learning about the greek gods and their myths thought «Well... let's see... these people really believed in these gods and those stories... thought they really happened... but there was no evidence they did and we all know they're not real now... so what's different between that and Christianity and other religions?»