Sentences with phrase «saw much opposition»

Not exact matches

I want to see America move forward at a much more progressive pace than what we are presently doing because of the Opposition Republican Party who says NO to everything.

I just can't stand seeing him not in there in favor of a 3rd wild - shooting guard, especially when Tatum's defensive length causes so much trouble for the opposition, to say nothing about his offensive weapons.

It might just be that England don't have Arsenal's fluidity in breaking down opposition, teams trying to get a handle on Ozil Alexis Cazorla Iwobi but then one diagonal run by Theo they don't see coming is just too much for many teams.

I see what you're trying to do, but the quality of our opposition isn't worth that much change.

What frustrated me is seeing Ramsey constantly behind the opposition when getting back to defend because he was too Att minded, I would much prefer to see Xhaka and Wilshere in CM as Wilshere can sit deep better and not so gungho.

They're are a rare breed of players who can break the opposition down from deep with one genius long pass that no else can see until it's too late, Pirlo, Xavi and Alonso are the only other guys that come to mind when talking of such game changing passes, Xhaka can become one too but he has to develop the same sort of vision, these players don't run much with the ball, the ball does the running for them and delivered to the right address.

i have to put my hand up and say i was wrong i thought we needed natural attacking left winger and a striker before DM how wrong i was, all do we needed the N / A / L / W and a ST but i can see how useless we have become in that area, Flam and Art are not cut out for the job we need a 6ft 5 inch of talented beast to bully the opposition and help out with defending, just go all out and get who ever our competition are after like they do to us, Gooners you are going to be surprised when you hear how much money we have in the bank when end of year accounts published end Oct / Nov we can get Pogba and Vidal sell a couple of players like the Prince and Campbell and get Reus.

Gnabry excites me when I watch him drive at opposition but I don't want to see him ruined by too much expectation, we're lucky he isn't English otherwise the papers would of made him out to be Englands saviour or something and piled the preasure on.

And for those who are constantly bashing him about his lack of impact in games, maybe you should watch the Newcastle game again and see how much impact a player like Ozil would have had, a player who can keep possession, drag opposition players out of position and requires constant attention from the opposition to stop him from delivering that one killer pass even if he seems to be having a bad game [I recall Ronaldinho had a relatively quiet game in the 2006 champions league final game, he did just one thing all game, he delivered that pass to Eto'o that got Lehmann sent off, he wasn't huffing and puffing for 90 minutes].

Whenever I see such an uneven game as happened last night (and indeed the cup tie a few weeks ago) I wonder how much of it was due to the opposition playing really well and how much was down to our own incompetence.

The game played much earlier this week saw The Reds defeat their Spanish opposition by three goals to nothing.

I'm looking forward to these next run of games given the opposition we'll be facing to see just how much work needs to be done with them.

We shall see if the Tories & LDs can continue to sing from the same sheet for much longer, but there may come a point (preferably after the AV referendum) that Labour's best strategy for avoiding another welfare - smashing lockout in opposition is to not take another state retrenchment (after Thatcher) lying down, & to agitate for the collapse of the Coalition, for a new Parliament, & a chance to reduce the deficit in a much cleverer, & less crude manner.

A Labour opposition with sharper instincts should be making much more headway than has been seen in these elections.

It's hard to overstate how much that control means to a certain brand of diehard liberals, who long to see unified state government finally crank its policy machinery at full activist throttle (and whose exasperation with Cuomo forms the core of opposition to the governor within his own party).

He chastised the opposition for refusing to see the good things the government was doing and only resorting to baseless accusations that the government had borrowed too much.

But that's irrelevant to the spirit of the question, since (1) Democratic politicians in fossil fuel states pretty much do the same thing (See West Virginia's Democrat Manchin); and (2) Such behavior is really industry agnostic, and every politician of every party whose constituents are over-represented in a particular industry will of course behave the same way about competing disruptive industry; and (3) The main opposition is not on alternative energy per se, but on measures to tax / disrupt fossil fuel one.

She has eclipsed the Scottish Labour Party and Lib Dems and is seen very much by Alex Salmond as the real leader of the opposition, but the Tories remain stuck in the polling doldrums in Scotland.

Much of Trump's support continues to stem heavily from opposition to his opponent, as we've seen elsewhere, though the difference between Trump and Clinton on that measure is smaller in Iowa.

Before any more roles are given to the great and the good of the Cabinet that did so much damage to Britain I'd like to see rewards for the people who toiled so hard for the Tories in the lean years of opposition.

Not much is lost by taking this step, and one definite benefit is obtained: one can capture the relative balance of support and opposition for any given year in a single number, allowing one to see how opinion is trending (or not) over time.

As I told TNTP (see fifth paragraph), if our leading reform organizations lack conservatives in their senior ranks, is it any wonder that our field doesn't understand — much less appreciate — the conservative opposition?

While it remains to be seen how much of ground the Cupertino based company cedes to a resurgent opposition, the new iPad 2 is already showing signs of a mega battle ahead.

Chris Early, Ubisoft's Vice President of Digital Publishing, has said that the company doesn't see as much opposition towards downloadable content as it did in the past.

The «just a game» point of view isn't articulated outright nearly as much as it's opposition, precisely because those who maintain it don't see in - depth conversation about the «nature of the medium» to be all that important or helpful.

For a much more comprehensive background on California's waiver and Wehrum's opposition, see this recent Desmog article.)

Here's what is required (leaving aside Theresa May's electorally hamstrung inability to deliver much of it): The entire cabinet and every business leader the government's black book can muster, on stage for the launch of the new strategy; an explicit declaration that this, full decarbonization of the economy, is the post-Brexit economic strategy; clear and attractive retail policies, such as a diesel scrappage scheme, tax breaks for green investment, new apprenticeships, a green home building program; an open invitation to all opposition party leaders to share a platform to support the plan with a declaration that while they may not agree on every component they fully endorse the over-arching goal; a willingness to shame those party leaders who play party politics and refuse to turn up; a fortnight - long program where each day sees a new cabinet member explain how the plan will transform parts of the economy; a Royal Commission on the flaws of GDP as an economic measure and the viability of alternative quality of life metrics; and, yes, a brave assertion that carbon intensive industries will have to transform or be scaled back, backed by a decarbonization adaptation fund to help affected communities respond to this global trend.

(For a much more rigorous analysis of the role of the climate change policy opposition in US climate policy formation see Brown 2002, chap 2 and Brown 2012, chap 2 and numerous articles on this website under the category of «disinformation campaign.»)

Although it is very personnally satisfying to see one of the «opposition» distance themselves from the «Hockey Team» I doubt we will see the politicians or the BBC suddenly say «OK thats it no more windmills, were gonna cut your taxes and green surcharges», they have far too much invested in this scare.

It would be interesting to know whether the climate science denial follows the opposition to wind power, or the opposition to wind power is at least partly because the disbelief in ACC causes the person to not see so much need for renewable energy.

While it is pleasing to see that the South Australian Liberals under Steven Marshal have become much more pro-renewable power than they were, what does the retention of a man with Mr Ridgway's record of dishonesty in such important positions tell us about the state opposition?

We as in - house counsel especially understand the value and importance of such principles, so I do not expect that there will be as much opposition from this segment of the bar as we have seen from the private practice bar.