Sentences with phrase «saw the responses since»

Not exact matches

While defense attorneys Strang and Buting have had the opportunity to bask in praise since Making a Murderer debuted, Kratz has seen the opposite response.

«Since launching the Deserve brand in October of 2017 and addressing the needs of young people who are new to credit, we've seen a huge response from young adults and college students across the nation,» Kapadia said.

I've kested four of the popular responses below and my replies to them since they are revealing about the mindset and tactics of Core and since I hope anybody who is on the fence can use them to see through the mist and make an educated decision.

But since certain parts of the submitted responses will be publicized, it should provide at least some useful information for Bitcoin investors to see how exactly these exchanges operate.

It's been nine months since the release of Evolving in Monkey Town, and I've been profoundly encouraged by the response I've received from those of you who see your own stories reflected in its pages.

Since then, the organization has seen an exceedingly positive response from its consumers.

Since I can't see responses I had to make this correction only as a joke not as a mean and vicious troll.

Hi Cindy, It's hard for me to say since I can't see what you're entering, but these responses from my site FAQs might be able to help!

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

Since the child comes from the parents, when you observe your child's response to your touch, also try the same techniques on your partner, or self the same way and in the same location, and you will see what your child has to teach you as well».

The royals» dismal, off - key response to the tragic death of Princess Di in 1997 whipped up more public vituperation against the Monarchy than anything we have seen since the ghastly Edward VIII ran off with Wallis Simpson back in the days of black and white newsreel.

Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.

Since posting her belly jiggle photo, Cristler has seen an overwhelming response from followers, and people are thanking her for her transparency.

Since our body thinks it's in a life or death situation (unfortunately, any stress response is seen as that according to our body), it prioritizes cortisol production over all other hormones.

You see, during an inflammatory response, the body produces chemicals known as cytokines — since the early 1980s, researchers have discovered that these cytokines cause a wide variety of neurological symptoms including anxiety [2, 3].

Since so much of the benefit in resistance training, especially for untrained individuals, is the neuroendocrine response, I would rather see a study where they compared aerobic training with a resistance training that included major barbell movements (bellow - parallel squat, shoulder press, bench press, deadlift) and maybe some type of vertical or horizontal pull (pull - ups or row).

I do nt know if you will see this since its been a month with no response, but processed food is, in my opinion, anything that has an ingredients list.

And, of course, since it's no fun to fill out a survey if you don't get to see your responses in action, I want to share the results with you along with my thoughts (and if you're here for the outfit photos just skip to the bottom of this post).

Since seeing the film in February, I've been something of a broken record saying that Wim Wenders's marvellous performance film «Pina» — which has been drawing rave responses at Toronto, and was recently submitted as Germany's entry for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar — single - handedly restates the case for 3D, a technology that any number of recent Hollywood blockbusters have tarnished somewhat.

Support has declined by 10 percentage points since 2013, suggesting that opinion has shifted in response to the media attention the issue has received during the ongoing Vergara v. California litigation over the constitutionality of tenure (see «Reaping the Whirlwind,» legal beat, Fall 2016).

Since then we have seen the emergence of Wi - Fi (wireless) and Web 2.0 technologies, ongoing laptop and iPad initiatives, the rise of course management systems, the ongoing investment in instructional technology infrastructure, the introduction of interactive whiteboards alongside personal response systems, and the somewhat uncritical labeling of young people as «digital natives.»

Avoid degrading or verbally abusing readers who give your book bad reviews or leave negative comments — it's not worth the trouble, and may actually end up hurting you and your author brand since the public can see your responses.

I was initially hesitant to review it, but a quick survey via our email newsletter got overwhelming response saying that you all wanted to see it reviewed here, and since I really don't need to have my arm twisted when it comes to buying new toys to play with, I went ahead and pre-ordered one to review here.

«Since partnering with hoopla digital last year, we've seen a terrific response from library patrons and are pleased with the engagement level of our audiobooks,» said Chantal Restivo - Alessi, Chief Digital Officer and EVP, International, HarperCollins Publishers.

Put simply, we have already implemented the responses that I insisted on due to stress - testing concerns and monetary interventions since 2009 (see Notes on an Extraordinary Market Cycle for details).

We will probably never see rates this low again in our life time (since they're a response to the biggest recession of our lifetime), and recessions are when millionaires are made!

The original response is attributed to Debi and has since been rebutted by Susan Damron Krug whose comments are seen in bold in applicable placements.

Sadly, the poor fellow who wore the outfit couldn't see or hear anything while he was in there, thus causing anyone who talked to him to think he was a total dick since he wouldn't say anything in response to their compliments.

Since its launch last October, we've seen a tremendous response to -LSB-...]

Weller, Allen S, «Chicago: French Classic and Three Americans», Arts Digest (New York), February, volume 29, no. 10, pp. 14 - 15 Morris, J.A, Two Hundred Years of American Painting, catalogue, Vancouver Art Gallery Williams, Hermann Warner, The 24th Biennial Exhibition of Contemporary American Painting, catalogue, Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. Three Young Americans, catalogue, Allen Memorial Art Museum, Oberlin College, Ohio Whiteside, Forbes, «Three Young Americans», Oberlin College Bulletin, volume 12, no. 3, pp.91 - 97 Preston, Stuart, «The Artist in Europe — And in America», New York Times, 8 May, section 6, pp.28 - 29 Devree, Howard, «About Art and Artists: Painting and Sculpture: American Show at Whitney, European at Modern Art», New York Times, 11 May, p. 29 Devree, Howard, «Modern Surveys» Development Since 1920 Seen in Three Shows», New York Times, 15 May, section 2, p. 9 Rosenblum, Robert, «The New Decade», Arts Digest (New York), 15 May, volume 29, no. 16, pp.20 - 33 Devree, Howard, «Response to Today: Museum Surveys Reveal Artists» Reactions», New York Times, 22 May, section 2, p. 11 Coates, Robert M, «The Art Galleries: The Grand Tour», New Yorker, 28 May, volume 31, no. 15, pp.90 - 92 Hess, Thomas B, «Mixed pickings from 10 fat years», Art News (New York), Summer, volume 54, no. 4, pp.36 - 39 & 77 - 78 Ashton, Dore, «Young Painters in Rome», Arts Digest (New York), 1 June, volume 29, no. 17, pp.6 - 7 Baur, John I.H, The New Decade: 35 American Painters and Sculptors, catalogue, Whitney Museum of American Art, New York Laverne, George, «Joseph Glasco», Arts (New York), November, volume 30, no. 2, pp.32 - 36 Hodgins, Eric and Lesley Parker, «The Great International Art Market», Fortune (New York), December, volume 3, no. 6, p. 118

See the UK's first major exhibition of artists» responses to war and conflict since the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001.

I always wanted to see a show of painters he influenced, and since that's not in my power, I asked some painters and compiled their responses and some of their work to put this together as a substitute and a way of giving thanks.

[Response: Sea ice is still not at levels seen during the Early Holocene, and since we are discussing sea floor sediments the main reason given to be concerned is that the change of summer sea ice will warm the bottom sea water, we are clearly not there yet.

[Response: I'm not a fan of false precision — since the uncertainty range on this number (as given by IPCC) is 1.13 — 3.33, I see little point in calling it 2.29 with three significant digits.

[Response: The forcings have been increasing since 1850 (see here), and taking the longest period possible minimises the influence of intrinsic decadal variability in the climate system.

[Response: I still don't see why you think that the warming will accelerate much faster than the models suggest since they include these mechanisms.

[Response: To pre-empt some mutual incomprehension, note that industrial CO2 rises are certainly an anthropgenic forcing and not a response (see here and here), but clearly CO2 changes over glacial - interglacial cycles is both a response (to Milankovitch - driven changes) and a forcing (since the additional radiative forcing from CO2 is about a third of that needed to keep the ice ages as cold as they are — seResponse: To pre-empt some mutual incomprehension, note that industrial CO2 rises are certainly an anthropgenic forcing and not a response (see here and here), but clearly CO2 changes over glacial - interglacial cycles is both a response (to Milankovitch - driven changes) and a forcing (since the additional radiative forcing from CO2 is about a third of that needed to keep the ice ages as cold as they are — seresponse (see here and here), but clearly CO2 changes over glacial - interglacial cycles is both a response (to Milankovitch - driven changes) and a forcing (since the additional radiative forcing from CO2 is about a third of that needed to keep the ice ages as cold as they are — seresponse (to Milankovitch - driven changes) and a forcing (since the additional radiative forcing from CO2 is about a third of that needed to keep the ice ages as cold as they are — see here).

Your statement that «Thus it is natural to look at the real world and see whether there is evidence that it behaves in the same way (and it appears to, since model hindcasts of past changes match observations very well)» seems to indicate that you think there will be no changes in ocean circulation or land use trends, nor any subsequent changes in cloud responses thereto or other atmospheric circulation.

Response: see above (I had to photoshop since I don't have the original figure in a nice format)-- gavin

[Response: The unprecedented melting discussed in the ACIA report refers to the period over which observations of melting exist from satellite, i.e., since 1979 — see the ACIA highlights report (p. 6) for details.

Underlying this entire context is the fact that we have not yet seen the equilibrium response or Earth system response from 350 to 400 ppm of CO2 — since the oceans are warming and ice is melting and the seas rising.

I am waiting for the response from the authors since I don't see anything so far that they wouldn't have known about and thus must have perfectly legitimate reasoning at their fingertips for why they did the things that are being listed as issues.

Using IPCC's mean (2xCO2) ECS estimate of 3.2 C, we should have seen 0.33 C warming since 1998; using a (2xCO2) «transient temperature response» of 2.0 C, we should have seen warming of 0.21 C since 1998.

I'd like to see how your comment was tongue in cheek especially since you were implying a serious response to someone you disagreed with.

For example, for a response to the contrarian fallacy «no global warming since 1998» see HERE with advanced details HERE.

(For a detailed description of the blocking role that the United States has played in international climate negotiations since 1990 until the Obama administration, See Brown, 2002, American Heat; Ethical Problems the US Response to Global Warming, and Brown, 2013, Climate Chang Ethics: Navigating the Perfect Moral Storm)

Since you don't consider my opinions to be worthy of response to me, perhaps you will again direct a comment to someone else as a means of actually addressing my comment, and in that I'll see your correction if my translation was accurate.

In a few weeks, I'll conduct the same searches and see what responses have appeared since the release of the reports.

That our legislative response to the problem will be bad, so, since it's an abstract one that we can't really see or feel anyway, there is instead probably just no real problem.

it is found that global temperature trends since 1998 are consistent with internal variability overlying the forced trends seen in climate model projections (Easterling and Wehner, 2009; Mitchell et al., 2012b); see also Figure 1.1, where differences between the observed and multimodel response of comparable duration occurred earlier.