When we buy a memoir, it's because we want to know more about a person's life, or what they have to
say about a certain subject.
Not exact matches
If one follows Whitehead here, the most one can
say about laws is that (A) no known data indicate that examined instances of contemporary laws constitute the complete class of instances, and that (B) we have reasonable grounds for holding laws to be unrestrictedly universal within a
certain spatiotemporal scope (whereas we can, by experimentation, know that accidental universals are closed or
subject to exceptions).
«If you have impassioned views on
certain subjects, often it's better to suppress them if you're presenting yourself to a group of people who are impassioned
about fixing the drains and making sure the dog dirt disappears from the streets,» he
says.
Simon & Schuster publisher Jonathan Karp
says of the book, «This is the perfect match of
subject and author, and it is
certain to be a landmark book
about one of the world's greatest innovators.»
In the real world, if someone purports to be an expert, they tell you that they have special knowledge of a
subject, that you should rely on their judgment that
certain claims are true, and they turn out to have no clue whatsoever
about said claims, that person is no longer considered reliable or trustworthy.