Sentences with phrase «say by answering the questions»

Not exact matches

«By asking this question, you can uncover exactly what issues the hiring organization has identified and is currently dealing with,» says Heather McNab, author of What Top Professionals Need to Know About Answering Job Interview Questions.

Alternatively, you can get fast answers to your questions by saying «Alexa, ask CNBC...» followed by your question.

«It's not a bad technique,» Whitaker says, «But a lot of people can answer those questions «of course I would do this and I would be nice to everyone,» and a lot of people get fooled by those.»

When you're on a sales call with a VIP client who represents a big sale (and a big commission), you make the best impression by listening intently to what he or she has to say, asking incisive questions and paying attention to the answers as if your career depends on it.

A report of court proceedings in February by the Daily Telegraph said Abdeslam was refusing to answer questions on the grounds that European courts are biased against Muslims.

On other occasions Trudeau has answered questions about Trump by saying Canadians «reject politics of fear and division» and also of «intolerance and hateful rhetoric.»

He also said there were questions to be answered by James Murdoch, the heir - apparent to his father's media empire.

When Zuckerberg began to answer by praising Chinese internet companies, Sullivan said, laughing, «You're supposed to say yes to this question.

If prospects find answers to their common questions via blog posts written by people at your company, they're much more likely to come into the sales process trusting what you have to say because you've helped them in the past — even before they were interested in purchasing anything from you.

There are all kinds of questions raised by the documents that need answers, he said.

He took it all in stride, appearing confident and poised throughout the question - and - answer period (at least, that's what professional PR experts quoted by Bloomberg had to say).

Edelman, who said he was launching a marketing services offering for advisors later this year, answered moderator Barthel's question about succession planning by saying «we have a very formalized» plan, before turning to the issue of partnerships.

Chairman Clayton said the SEC was «working the beat hard» to crack down on ICOs, but chose not to answer a question posed of him by Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, namely whether the SEC will «go back» and scrutinize earlier ICOs.

A spokeswoman declined to answer a series of direct questions from CNBC about his case, instead providing a statement from Acting Assistant Attorney General Caroline D. Ciraolo of the Justice Department's Tax Division: «Bradley Birkenfeld was afforded due process of law and sentenced by a federal district court after full consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, including his admission that he advised wealthy UBS clients on how to conceal their assets from the U.S. government,» she said.

«The answer may be entirely innocent,» Mr. Denton said, musing on the question of whether Mr. Harder was paid by someone other than Mr. Hogan, «but I think in order for people to understand what's going on here, what the stakes are, I think it's important that it be out in public, or at least that he'd be asked the question in public.»

Two analysts said they believed that Apple would not have answered them and that its executives would have been «irritated» by the questions.

NT Wright says that the protestant answer (salvation is by faith, not deeds) is a good answer to a wrong question.

Later he would say that «those kinds of questions [to starve the afflicted child] can be answered best by the people who are right there on the scene, if they think clearly and act responsibly.»

He tells the story of a conference he was at where he asked a Catholic priest what Jesus meant by «unless you hate your mother and father you can not be my disciple» and the priest waffled and said he wasn't prepared to answer such a difficult question.

Before attempting to answer this question, I should like to make some highly important preliminary distinctions, by saying what the gospel is not.

Permit me to preface my remarks by saying that I do not wish to take a position on the thorny doctrinal question whether we know that some (unknown) persons will be damned, although I take it for granted» as do von Balthasar and Neuhaus» that Catholic theology does not hold or teach that we know all will be saved, a proposition it is unlikely even the optimistic Origen affirmed with certainty, and is surely difficult to square with Jesus» repeated teaching on the «two ways» (e.g., Matthew 7:13 «14), especially his answer to the question whether only a few would be saved.

oops again, then if it said G - d spoke then G - d spoke inerrent through the writer which we may believe in the same way we believe the more sure word of prophecy, the gospel itself, foolishness to those perishing and so on,... does it give me words to live by, then the answer to your question and my application in my own life the answer would have to be Yes.

Maybe to say «that is a good question but I cant give you a satisfactory answer» maybe put the ball back into his / her court by offerring an invitation to the Alpha course or to come along to a small Bible study group st your home or an invitation to a non Church tyoe activity with other Christians, walk, bike ride, five a side football or other sporting things, befriend them and truly love them without an agenda.

You say you are Christian, and you show it by your action, you are kind when you address others questions, you do not attack, but answer to the best of your ability.

And, as Pope Benedict again has said, this fundamental question, which isa question we have to answer with our intelligence sustained by the light of faith, is that if we discern reason in the world, in nature - if nature is understandable - the question arises; where does this come from?

So in I Corinthians, having asked how the dead are raised, he attempts to answer the question by saying, on the one hand, that there is some kind of real, though indefinable, continuity between our present bodily mode of existence and the life beyond death, and, on the other, that there is discontinuity also.

Refusing to answer reporters» questions, he says, is hardly compelled by a desire to protect the lives of American troops.

Answering a question by DUP MP Jim Shannon during PMQs on Wednesday, Theresa May said she's looking to do more to help those who face violence because of their faith.

You said, «Wait, so the problem with Creationism is that it «makes up» answers to questions man does not have real answers for by finding an idea that fits all the observable criteria in a meaningful and consistant way?»

There's plenty of room to interpret and disagree, but being / not being a Christian devolves to how each of us answers a single question — one posed by Jesus to his own apostles: «Who do you say I am?»

Unlike you however I am not angry at or frustrated by those who disagree with me, because, like you I can not prove you are wrong and I am not going to waste my time trying, nor am I going to call you names and say you are closed minded in your conviction that science can answer all questions, in time.

Now, as Nagel argues, this is not the sort of question that you can answer by looking at a few examples (bats for Nagel, Christians for us) and pointing and saying, «Well, being a bat (or a Christian) is like this.»

They will cling to «answers,» instead, and some will attack those who willingly question and criticize the same by saying «you're calling my beliefs baloney» or similar.

For the present, we may answer the question propounded at the beginning by saying that the Bible is a unity of diverse writings which together are set forth by the Church as a revelation of God in history.

Whitehead would answer the metaphysical question by holding that both God and World are ultimate, as in his famous antithesis «It is as true to say that God creates the world, as that the world creates God» (PR 348).

Bishop Paulose says, «It is by this reasoning, namely by a bold effort to answer the question of how Jesus Christ can become lord even of the religionless, that Bonhoeffer arrived at his conclusion that the church should work out and proclaim a «non-religious» interpretation of Biblical and theological concepts».

The affirmation in Mark 14:61 in answer to Pilate's question is less likely to have been spoken by Jesus than the replies given in Matthew 27:11 and Luke 22:70, for if he had said that he was the Son of God, the Jews could have put him to death for blasphemy.

Anybody who has a belief and has the luck of travelling to beautiful places would answer your question by saying yes.

«To be religious,» said theologian Paul Tillich, «is to be grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as preliminary and which itself contains the answer to the question of the meaning of life.»

Now if interpretation is, as Gadamer says, the attempt to hear again the question which occasioned the answer provided by the text, then forgetfulness of the perennial questions of existence is a major block to interpretation.

Before answering the question, Robertson acknowledged the statement was controversial by saying, «I know that people will probably try to lynch me when I say this.»

During a Wednesday meeting with journalists to answer questions about the situation, the Rev. Frederico Lombardi said the «hypothesis» advanced by some media outlets that the pope would resign are «baseless creations of some journalists, which have no foundation in reality.»

Los Angeles Times: Rabbi who refused to testify freed after seven months in prison A Brooklyn orthodox rabbi who was jailed after refusing to answer questions before a federal grand jury, saying his religion forbid him from testifying against other Jews, was ordered freed this week by a district court judge in Los Angeles, the rabbi's attorney said.

Of course I am not supposing for a moment that, by what I have been saying, I have answered all the questions with which modern science confronts religious faith.

This question of your can be answered by saying that it is up to you to live 100 years of self inflicted pain or live 100 years of understanding and avoid self inflicted pain that the 90 % are doing to themselves and others.

Hi David, I felt very moved by your cartoon and what you wrote but I have to say I have more questions than answers at the moment!

I love the way when someone give a stupid answer to a question, that they're defended by saying the question was a set - up or a got - cha question, that the asker had now business asking.

To say that God prevails in these orders would not provide the kind of answer called for by the question «Does God exist?»

Amazing how when I needed answers for the deep questions of life I had two choices to make them with: Follow (by rote) what the Bible said or remember what is the true spirit of who Jesus is and how he would react to an issue or problem.

You are correct when you say «Any questions / answers surrounding God, are too big to be answered by mankind.»