Sentences with phrase «say city spent»
, you first say city spent # 280 m on their defence when I pointed out you were wrong you also want to include the subs Just remember auba and lacca Cost similar fees to the city defenders And your answer buy the club Is childish
http://www.justarsenal.com/ Not exact matches
Maguire says his airline is focused on nonstop service between smaller cities that lost service but still have business travelers who may not want to spend the time connecting through larger airlines» hubs.
Icahn says that he spent $ 100 million trying to revive the Trump Taj Mahal, but was he was stymied, in part, by the longest strike in Atlantic City history, which started on July 1.
His father founded a construction company and a small hotel in Buenos Aires, and the family spent summers in New York City, where Fuks says he first got the urge to start something himself.
Mark Bello (above) opened Pizza a Casa on New York City's Lower East Side, he says, after spending nearly five years as a «nomadic pizza - teacher - for - hire,» sharing his pizza skills at various locations around the Big Apple.
Steve Ward, who spent seven years as an officer with the Seattle Police Department and six with the city's SWAT team, says he founded Seattle - based VieVu in 2007 to protect officers against unfounded civilian complaints.
Governor Snyder has said that the bankruptcy filing will allow the city to spend more money on public services because less of its money will be hurdled toward paying interest on debt.
The former mayor, who spent $ 261 million on his campaigns for New York City office, says he'd spend as much as $ 1 billion of his own money on a presidential run.
... Now listen, you who say, «Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money.»
«If you live in a big city and need to spend more on housing due to work and the current rental market, it's OK to do so as long as you adjust some of your other discretionary spending,» says Ash Exantus, director of financial education at BankMobile, a digital banking platform.
Rather than spending time and resources putting together a proposal to woo Jeff Bezos, city and state officials could have said, «No thank you, Amazon.
She says the residents «think somebody owes them something,» and complains that they spend money on expensive hairstyles, makeup and leather coats but won't pay a token fee to send their children to a weeklong summer camp program her church runs for the benefit of inner - city youngsters.
Of course, this whole week has served as a profound reminder of the truth of James» instructions to the early church: «Now listen, you who say, «Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money.»
Chance was there to oppose the city spending $ 95 million on a new police academy, and said that the city should instead be investing in public schools.
... «[Our cats] sleep in our beds and we spend a lot of money buying them toys we think they'll like,» says Christina Ha, co-founder of Meow Parlour, New York City's first cat café.
Having said that, I've been spending a lot of time lately reflecting on Hebrews 13:14: «For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city which is to come.»
The cities of which Mayernik writes» and I have been blessed to have spent time in all five» and others like them captivate us to this day; and whatever else can be said about such places, they demonstrate, in the author's words, that «the costs of building great cities can't be justified in purely pragmatic terms.»
Saying that, We are set up to not spend like Chelsea, City, United.
The Swede, who has also formerly managed the England national team, says City should be doing better this season considering the money they've spent in the transfer market.
Hold on a minute here, how about the fact that everyone said Man City had the best squad, or that Man United's massive spending should put the pressure on them to win?
So my friend if wenger is waiting for the likes of Chelsea and city to spend so that he can also spend, then am sorry to say that he is dumb as f ***
«People try to start things with me because of who I am, and I know that means I have to stay away,» he says while sitting in the Newport News City Farm, a minimum - security work camp where he has spent the last month.
Good players can come cheap, you saying «let City, United, Chelsea and even Liverpool buy the good players» would seem to indicate that good players MUST cost a fortune as it is in reply to someone saying you don't have to spend loads, this is not the case as LC have proven.
Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet Man - U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to spend
And if you think about it, the triumph of the underdogs Leicester City has actually proved the Frenchman right, because for years he has been saying that it is not all about spending money on big name transfers.
Don't make spence AW reacently said that because of the new relaxing of the FFP rooks (thanks to F, ink platini) we can not commpeet with City or Chelsea in the transfer market because they have more spending power then us,
Arsenal board thought that with the FFP rools salaries and signing fees would go down and all be equal, what with our new stadium with extra incom and new sponsership they thought we will do well without spending big, but unfortunately FIFA is droping FFP they can't control it like they thought Manchester City already saying they are not following rools this season and they are spending big eaven if it means huge fines
To all who say we don't need a keeper, then you don't seem to be realizing our Num 2 will be Martinez wake up this is a golden opportunity that we will never get again.psg have trapp.Barca have ter the German, navas is staying at Madrid, de gea at Manchester, man city just spent 30 mil, Bayern has neur, courtois at Chelsea, oblak at atletico, even Tottenham have hugo, our only completion is juve and both of us have an aging keeper who won't last more than two seasons at the top.
SEE ALSO: Top Four Good Enough For Man United Despite # 150m Spending Spree, Says Liverpool Legend Brendan Rodgers Rules Out Leaving Liverpool For Manchester City Liverpool news
man city have tabled 50m for de bryune they are also going for otamendi sterling has settled and that makes them title favourites imo.when lord harris said there is 200m for transfer akbs were the first here to oppose that in defense of wenger, why oppose spending like club money belongs to you!lets unite for a course please, arsenal needs a revolution.Wenger is a manager of doom 10 yrs without Title says it all really.Lets storm the emirates and demand for a change!!
That, however, would only stop the likes of Man City and Chelsea, who are both said to be very keen, on signing our star player, but the latest Arsenal transfer rumours had the big spending French ligue 1 outfit PSG as the main suitors.
United already got Depay who really is a special player and are willing to spend a load more, City just said they will be splashing cash, Mourinho wants 3 more players to a team that won the league by a mile and wants to rehabilitate Falcao.
his comments abt man city spending to justify not spending sums up his intentions.AND TO KNOW THAT THE MAN HAS GOT SO MANY OTHER FRANCHISES / CLUBS IN USA JUST GOES ONTO SHOW HE AI NT SERIOUS WITH EITHER OF THEM, RATHER ITS ALL ABT ACQUIRING MORE WEALTH.COS LETS BE HONEST, U CANT MANAGE WELL SO MANY TEAMS.IF AN OWNER REALLY HAD ANY INTENTION TO IMPROVE, THEN THEY WUD HAV MAYBE 1 OR AT MAX 2 TEAMS AND FOCUS ON THEM.i maybe wrong, but stan gives me all the wrong vibes.whatever ppl say abt man city, i got ta admit they are giving their best for the club.a good finance manager and a level - headed coach will fix their problem of excessive spending!
We heard that those who spend big win trophy but what what Leicester City??!! As you said their entire team is not worth what Ozil widths!!!! This guy is at the end of the road in my opinion today he said ticket price is high because we spend TV REVENUE to buy players what a stinking liar!!!
Chelsea transferred their middle table club into prem winners within couple years of spending serious money and the same has to be said about Man City.
Di maria on the bench and you can expect man u carry on trying to buy results with more crazy spending this summer but it does nt mean it will work.man city with the ageing team they will be forced to go thru changes that what jose said.
People say city needs to spend another # 250 million, as if they haven't spent enough already.
Wenger even said himself at the time and we all stupidly believed him, that once the stadium is paid for, we would be able to spend as much as the Chelseas and Man Citys of this world.
Conte this week said Chelsea said can't compete with City even with an ever - ready - to - spend Abramovich.
When I said ev is more sensible some guy said man city is more Barca than Barca, Now you guys should appreciate ev, pep would never coach a team that was in Barcelona's condition, I know pep spends hell and leaves a team in a very good position for the future, but pep can't work with what he has, he went trophies less in his first season with man city, he would be disgraced in his third season and leave as usual (no offence to pep he is my all time favourite coach) and I would take him back in a heartbeat but I would not sack ev for him.
I am saying let us give Wenger the benefit of the doubt and let him act in January — we are not the only club going through tough times — City, United, Liverpool have all spent almost double to triple what he have and two of those clubs are behind us in the table!
I would like to meet 1 yes 1 Arsenal fan who is behind Wenger he's a blatant liar, and I predict this is the end for him, we may win a few games this year but we are an embarrassment, how can a manager turn down Balotelli Remy Vela and then agree to Welbeck I'm lost for words, wil will suffer this year, I don't blame welbeck he's a genuine lad who works hard but he's not a CF who will bang in 25 there are teams who are better then us and I hate to say it but City Chelsea Liverpool Even Man U at the end of this window will be better Then Everton Lukaka Swansea Bomy I'm devastated this is the worst ever time as a gunner at least I forgave him when we built the ground but now we have No excuse I will not be spending # 250 to travel to see them this season
But easy to say negative things when your an addict of negative making negative statements we did nt win everything every year tottenham has been behind us till this year for 2o years mu went through 3 managers then got mourinho and he said hi i see you have billlions of dollars to spend why do nt you buy a team ill smile for three years make some dumb comments win a title chelsea not yet mu cause you spent more money than anyone else has except those city folks recently and play fall asleep football i mean wenger is great and haters gonna hate cause thats all they know to do they'll hate till we win the title then be happy for a day once its confirmed then say well we did nt win champions leauge or vice versa cause they re a negative addict they nead their dose to disassemble true success
I don't understand when people say that Arsenal shouldn't spend like city e.t.c. Arsene Wenger is the 5th highest spending manager in Europe of the last decade, behind Conte, guardiola mourinho.
The essence of what he said was that Arsenal are now in the same spending bracket as our Premier League rivals and so should be under the same pressure as Chelsea and Man City are to win the title every year.
They are all useless or always injured.No wonder the greatest time Arsenal had was when the time was one with almost NO british players in.The «british core» experiment just failed, move on and bring real footballers from all over the world, hungry to do performance and to earn well - deserved wages.Don» t look back and sell tem ALl.No regrets whatsover - if Barca is so crazy to spend a fortune on a mediocre player like Ramsey - I say take the money and run.Same applies to Whilshere if City offer stands.I hope Mertesacker will never see the starting 11 again.Can u imagine this guy facin Messi, Neymar or Suarez?Atrocious picture!Just embarrasing - but guess what?
its on him now - none of u can say... oh well man city spent 150 million.
City, Chelsea, Man u, all spent considerable amount of money and I've to say it didn't mean squat when it came to the standings.
«What we learn from Leicester City is what I knew for a long time, which is that it's not just only down to the amount of money you spend,» he said.
Stoke City manager Mark Hughes says his side matched Everton despite their summer spending but Wayne Rooney was the difference, scoring the winner in a 1 - 0 defeat.