Sentences with phrase «say claiming right»

Not exact matches

He also relies heavily on claims made by human rights groups and the United Nations in supporting his case against the Assad regime — claims that some skeptics have said are made with zero verification.

«We're trying to get them some money right now, get their claim started, and basically make things as easy as possible for them and make sure they're in a safe place,» says Rosa Nelson, a spokesperson for Intact Insurance, Canada's largest property and casualty insurer.

«I'm not making any great claims, but we want to be right in there,» Dyson says.

Sessions himself has said a «properly exercised» Civil Rights Division «provides tremendous benefit to American citizens» but should not be used as «a sword to assert inappropriate claims that have the effect of promoting political agendas.»

Assange has made a point of comparing his organization to traditional media outlets, saying in a recent opinion piece in the Post that his motive «is identical to that claimed by the New York Times and the Post — to publish newsworthy content,» and that WikiLeaks publishes material «irrespective of whether sources came by that truth legally or have the right to release it.»

«Li & Fung claims to be monitoring factory conditions, but they don't publicly release their investigation reports or even the full list of the factories they use, so it's impossible for independent organizations to assess the effectiveness of their monitoring,» said Tim Connor, a former labor rights advocacy coordinator for Oxfam.

It's important to get things right from jump street vis - à - vis customer service; a man (I make no claim to his wisdom, he may have had the wisdom a closed - head - injured orang) once said «if you don't have time to do it right, when will you find time to do it over?»

Yum, which will spin off its China restaurants on Oct. 31, said the last quarter started well there — but its stores were hit by protests after an international court rejected China's claim to historic rights in the South China Sea.

The Child DAO issue eventually led to an Ethereum hard fork, the result of voting to not let the attacker (who said he had legal right to his property through a lawyer) have his prize for his creation, and emptying the piggy bank to all those who lost ETH and laid claim to it.

«The DOL has created a new private right of action,» said Fleckner, who led Goodwin's successful defense of an excessive fee claim against John Hancock in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in 2014, and was a signatory to an amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court on behalf of the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association in Tibble v. Edison.

But as with past Supreme Court ATS decisions, the justices once again failed to shut the door entirely on human rights activists: the ruling said nothing about the many ATS claims pending against American corporations.

In a story published Sunday, The New York Times said Trump's longtime lawyer Michael Cohen had received information from both American Media, the tabloid's owner, and McDougal's attorney in the summer of 2016 about the American Media payment to McDougal for the exclusive rights to her claims of an affair.

Mr. Anglin has a habit of saying what he thinks — which, despite the claims of the Wildrose Party and other right - wing Western Canadian political groups that's how elected officials should act, doesn't really go over that well in the real world of politics.

Rosales has never filed a claim against a worker who violated a non-disparagement clause with an online post, and in his experience, he said, those clauses don't prevent workers from exercising their rights to speak about workplace conditions.

But if you look at the bible and how christians use it by picking out what parts they agree with and dismissing the horror of it as «cultural of the times» it says to me that their sense of right and wrong is more evolved than the book they claim is the final authority of right and wrong.

If the Muslims claimed their God was the right one, or the Mormons claimed their God was the right one, or the Hindus claimed their gods were the true gods, would it be convincing to you if they said — «Look around!

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

You do comprehend that all Atheist means is without a belief in a god or gods, right??? I'm not the one claiming a god and given that you refuse to answer any questions, it is rather safe to say you're lying about all you claim.

They all claim to be the right one, and now we're saying... what?

There were two main camps at the time: that represented by Jovinian, claiming that virgins, widows, and married women were all deserving of equal merit, and that represented by Jerome, which said that marriage was merely the lesser of two evils, rather than something positive in its own right.

it's no more speical than any other state in the world, it's just a clump of dirt that has been claimed by people that america dumped there after WW2; so i would say the palestinians have a right to upset that their land was invaded.

You say it is risible to claim that figures such as Gary Bauer, James Dobson, Phyllis Schlafly, William Bennett, and Robert Bork think the country is basically in good shape, and you are right.

He said, «This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots.

Along with your right to say hateful things, comes the fallout of others» right to ridicule or even offend you and / or whatever deity you claim to speak for.

You may not like the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, you may not agree with their tenets, you may even feel you are such an expert on what makes someone a Christian and have the right to make the judgement on who is and who isn't, but spouting off inaccurate claims indicates no credibility, and inasmuch as Jesus said «thou shalt not bear false witness» I guess it doesn't leave you looking much like a Christian.

Second, are you saying that anyone who claims to get their beliefs from Scripture must therefore be right?

When you say Chick - fil - a denies people the rights they claim for themselves though, I take a little exception to that... after all, what group doesn't do that?

Similarly, if — like Jonah — we claim to worship and fear God, but do not do what God says, then although we may believe many right and good things about God, and though we may have faith that rivals that of Abraham, our faith is useless and pointless.

Might we say «He who lays claim to all his rights wins»?

little confused now... you shifted the conversation completely... we [you] were saying that hitler was a christian — for whatever reason, oh because he claimed to be catholic, that's right... so what does this have to do with Matthew 5 or the commandments???

Both claim to be right based on their, I hate to say it as it isn't the same, belief.

No matter how reasonable the claims of the gospel may seem, many persons will exercise their God - given right to say No.

To say that all religious communities recognize the right of people not to be tortured, or that all religious communities support the self - determination of indigenous peoples is not very exciting: even if these claims are true (and I suspect that they are not), they bear little relation to any claim that a faithful member of any religious community would recognize as his own.

I guess what I'm getting at is that freedom of speech is a protected right of American citizens and so this guy has a right to say whatever he wants but please don't try and dress it up in some pretty bow and claim that it isn't an attack or an attempt to prove Christians wrong.

Claiming his right to respect for his private life had been infringed by the coverage, Sir Cliff sued South Yorkshire Police and the BBC, saying he wanted «very substantial» damages.

An exclusive belief claim is one that says what I believe is right and all others are wrong.

As to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripture.

I see his «claim,» his right, we might even say his «share» in the whole structure.

You said «Being a good existentialist, however, I claim my right for proof of God's non-existence.

This comes surprisingly close to saying that Manuel II got it right when he claimed that Islam had been spread by the sword; and it does prompt an important question: of those many Muslims who took offence at the Pope's use of Manuel II's words, why did so few of them respond that he was in error, since Islam is essentially a religion of peace?

where's the «democracy» you are claiming that you have,, tell me exactly are a religious nations, racist nations,, do you really care of the ppl despite their religions or with their religions,, let's say you have the chance to kick them out,, would u kick the native British Muslims out as well,, do u have the rights??

I would say to anyone out there that claims they are not bigoted but merely taking a godly stand against what they believe to be sinful, If you want to honestly examine it, the next time you are going to say something to a homosexual, treat them a certain way, or argue that certain rights should be denied them, ask yourself a few simple questions.

the only real control one has is the outward interactions with others and if those who claim to hold to a moral code show a lack of understanding on said claims then it is the duty of those seekers of truth to right the wrongs committed in the names of others by ignorant fools.

He thinks saying something stupid (insulting, claiming the ability to read minds and just telling peopl they are wrong [instead of what is right]-RRB- is productive.

But such a claim depends upon the arguments that the «Lord» sits at the right hand of God whereas the «son of David» sat upon an earthly throne, i.e. it depends on the argument of Acts 2.34 («For David did not ascend into the heavens; but he himself says, «the Lord said to my Lord, «Sit at my right hand... `» «-RRB-.

fred Because, if the tale were true, then what he said would have been as blasphemous then as anyone claiming to be God today, right?

Whereas Jesus said, «If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also,» President Bush, who claims to be a follower of Jesus, says, «If you think that Hussein will strike you on one cheek, hit him, along with innocent bystanders.»

If you do not believe what the moronic «fringe» says then take issue with them publicly as I have with those like Westboro Baptists and other religious right wing fascists who claim to be Christian!

Not to say that they don't think people and our groups can't be good, but that the church has no divine right to claim that it is good by default.

That is, the data used in the study suspiciously match another data set entirely; the prestigious gay - rights research institute at the grad student's university says it did not fund any survey effort as he claimed it did; the student admits to having no such funding and to not having paid survey respondents as he claimed; the private firm allegedly employed to collect survey data says it has never heard of him or his study.