Sentences with phrase «say full i mean»

Not exact matches

«People think full representation means 50 percent men and 50 percent women,» says Brown.

Freelance work can allow them to get real world experience and earn some money until they land a full - time job, he said, although relying solely on that type of employment can also mean there's a lack of corporate identity — for the company as well as for the freelancers themselves.

That's only if the company has at least one full - time employee eligible for a premium assistance tax credit or cost - sharing reduction created by the legislation - and analysts say that eligibility isn't an easy thing to judge, meaning all larger employers could face the responsibility come tax - time.

In December, the $ 1 million prize was doubled by Israeli philanthropist Morris Kahn, meaning that Portman would have received $ 2 million, money she said she would donate in full to programs focused on female empowerment and equality.

Say you opened the card in February — you can earn the full $ 200 credit before the calendar year ends, then once the credit resets on January 1, get it again before your next annual fee posts, meaning you can get up to $ 400 in value from this credit each year.

The «modest» wage pressures so far this year mean the labor market is tightening and could well exceed «full employment» next year, Rosengren said.

«None of the schools really call it «scholarships,» they just say «full funding» — and that usually means that you get all of the tuition covered and then an additional stipend on top of that to cover housing and living costs,» Corinne said.

«Strong encryption is in our nation's best interest,» he said, before quickly clarifying he means strong, not full encryption of email and online files.

If an app says it has «full account access» that means it can view and make changes to nearly everything but Google Pay and your password.

So awesome, in fact, that Brunelle says he has «no complaints and no regrets» after six months as an Office Nomads full - timer — even though it's meant sacrificing those pajamas - and - Xbox afternoons.

A narrow plurality of offerors (49 percent) say the On - Demand economy should not be regulated and companies should compete to offer workers fair pay and benefits, even if it means less security, compared to 40 percent who say the government should regulate the sharing economy to guarantee independent contractors the same benefits afforded to full - time workers, even if it means fewer jobs.

Goldman Sachs said it would offer limited access for certain customers, but according to Bloomberg, the bank has demanded that some of its clients set aside funds equal to the full value of their bitcoin futures trades as a condition for doing the transaction, meaning Goldman is still very nervous about the potential for big losses in Bitcoin futures.

Denton said that he estimates there's a roughly 1 - in - 10 chance that Gawker will face «disaster» — meaning that they lose the trial, the jury awards Hogan a large amount in damages, and Gawker is required to put up a bond for the full amount while it appeals the ruling.

So that means that it is God is responsible for those women being guilty of murder according to «Sanct.ity of Human Life Act: H.R. 212» which says that life starts at fertilization and guarantees that life full protection under the law.

so glad YOU know what god means... why don't you enlighten the rest of us becuase the bible is full of contradictions... I am going to come here everyday now to see if you can fill me in... but unless you can clear it up for me post haste, I am going to continue to view belief in god as silly and childish which it is and that is how I teach it... I don't say «all of you listen: god doesn't exist.»

One way to illustrate the full scope of this problem would be to look more closely at the horizonal character of the ecstatic past in contrast with the past of the ordinary interpretation of time, which is only understood by negative contrast with the present.5 Here Mason, apparently following Whitehead, allows us to make a particularly striking contrast: we can never change the past» he says (p. 95), meaning to evoke what Heidegger calls Dasein's «facticity» and to compare it with the objectivity with which perished actual occasions confront the concrescing actual entity in Whitehead.

If I may say, though, you can get contraceptives (meaning BAGS full of condoms) for free at the health dept.. This isn't a good battle - ground.

To say that it is not moral for man to do it but then say it is moral for god to do the same (or even more extreme action) means that you believe in divine command theory (look it up) which is a very dangerous concept and the argument is full of holes.

Analogously, it might be said that perfection in sexual intercourse involves seeking the full meaning of the act, i.e. seeking procreation, a godly but imperfect use of the actinvolves seeking a secondary end without the primary end (or in its conscious absence), while it is sinful directly to oppose the primary end of procreation.

It might be said that this tension is resolved neatly by the full meaning of Jesus» injunction, «Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness and all these things will be added unto you».

«To speak of God's Kingdom,» says Wright, «is thus to invoke God as the sovereign one who has the right, the duty, and the power to deal appropriately with evil in the world, in Israel, and in human beings, and thereupon to remake the world, Israel, and human beings... When full allowance is made for the striking differences of genre and emphasis within scripture, we may propose that Israel's sacred writings were the place where, and the means by which, Israel discovered again and again who the true God was, and how his Kingdom - purposes were being taken forward... Through scripture, God was equipping his people to serve his purposes.»

Well, one thing we can say with certainty (and in full agreement with Paul), is that the Law was never given as a way to gain eternal life, or a means of pleasing and appeasing God.

And it's wrong to say the tithe was meant to support the temple and a full - time priest hood.

Hoefer 1979) says that the «rite has become a legal condition for the entry into the church which functions as a religious communal group; in this context it fails to convey its full meaning and purpose as the expression of or solidarity with the new humanity in Christ which transcends all communal or caste solidarities»; he also refers to the conclusion of Joseph Belcastro's book A New Testament Doctrine of Baptism for Today, that «the N.T. does not teach that baptism was a condition of salvation or church membership, but baptism was to be available for the disciples of the coming church....

Strings like, «There is something wrong with you if you don't speak in tongues» (a very unBiblical one that), you must have a full submersion baptism because the last baptism you had wasn't wet enough, you must sing naff choruses or it means you do nt» want to worship God, you must believe that the vast majority of people that have lived on earth are damned to everlasting Hell, you must not say anything controversial, you must not be too intellectually assertive if you're a woman, you must do as we say and believe as we say, you must force yourself to be attracted to people with a particular set of genitalia or be lonely and unfulfilled for the rest of your life.

Old worries, however, have by no means been dissipated: «Having said this, I must also acknowledge that the emergence of a full - bodied Jewish conservatism faces serious obstacles.

However, what «Whitehead said could mean a number of things, not the least of which is that he is not worried by Bergson because Whitehead is in more or less full agreement with him, just as he reported in 1919, and as Laguna said in print.

Of course the true sign that is given all Christians is Christ's death and resurrection, and so we must say that Matthew has in a sense rightly interpreted the full meaning of Jesus» words, but in such a way as to make it harder to get at the original sense of the passage.

Thomas Jefferson himself said,» Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is JUST, that His justice can not sleep forever» These words clearly testify AGAINST the Founding Fathers showing they KNEW FULL WELL what they were doing and that their GROSS SINS would someday mean PUNISHMENT for how this nation was ESTABLISHED.

The refusal to mean what we say about baptism's inclusiveness is a reflection of a society that denies children full citizenship.

I get Texas.I lived half my life in Texas, grew up in Texas churches, ministered in 3 of them, accepted the gospel of Willow Creek (which is from Chicago but is Texas - sized) in one of them, and know full well what Jesus meant when he said a prophet is not accepted in....

To be sure, it was only in the community that the meaning of the event was realized and thus it was only there that the event in the full sense occurred, but, even so, it would obviously be truer (or at least less false) to say that the event produced the church than that the church produced the event, although the Christian would prefer to say that God created both.

I can understand making the point that the people of Ferguson should be invited to forgive what they perceived as a wrong on the part of the officer...... but for you to make the assumption and then state that the Officer's action was «wrong» (if that is what you meant to say) is not something I can agree with, not without your full rationale (which maybe I missed from an earlier post)....

1) Charities spend their income on necessities, such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products, rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their money quickly, but on independent schedules, making for a smoother stimulus effect on the economy 3) Charities make purchases tax - free, meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve society; from birth control to bombers, government assuredly spends money on something you don't like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible, meaning you keep those tax dollars in your local community 6) Charitable donations provide the funds necessary for volunteers to serve the needy, thus giving «the average citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

But for the record, when Prothero singled out Christians (with a strong implication that he meant the Christian right) had some special obligation to disown and condemn the Norwegian mass murderer, I thought he was full of it and said so.

We do not say that in what follows there is anything like a full account of the meaning of the pre-existence of the Son or of the Word, but, whatever else that doctrine may or may not mean, it does mean this.

But this is not what is meant here, for von Weizsäcker said, «a physical object in the full sense of exercising action and suffering effects.»

The question was pregnant with all kinds of meaning, as if to say: «Though I have been a Jew and have done everything required of me and have kept the commandments, I am not a full participant, I am not an equal.

«No one knew the full meaning of God's promise to Abraham that «in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed» (Gen 12:3) until Paul wrote, «And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, «All the nations shall be blessed in you»» (Gal 3:8).

If by the «primitive church» we mean the church of the first century and the first quarter, say, of the second — and such a period represents the approximate range of this chapter — we have at most only the New Testament documents and some of the Apostolic Fathers; and none of these documents is concerned to set forth in any full or systematic way the constitution of the church or the methods of its work.

When I say experienced, I mean the full mindful eating approach.

When you say «coconut milk» do you mean the canned full calorie coconut milk or in the carton like nondairy milk substitute?

So, when you say «full - bodied red wine,» what does that mean?

I should explain that when I say «full - out Fall weekend,» I really mean that I went to «Deer Camp.»

«The drought in the third quarter has been more severe and lasted longer than anyone might have predicted, and means we are currently forecasting total milk collection volumes for the full season to finish in line with last season,» said Fonterra chairman, John Wilson.

But Nexba co-founder and global chief executive Troy Douglas said the full distribution agreement with Woolworths, which puts its raspberry, lemon and cola drinks on shelves from September 4, meant a big acceleration in the business as it taps into growing demand from consumers.

If you're more of a fan of full fat dairy, I say by all means go for it!

I mean look at carzola, he says outright without hiding that we need a striker... about finishing strongly, we did that last season and the season after and the other after after a first leg screw - up... maybe ramsey loves his friends in the dressing room but saying that we need a few quality wouldn't have hurt anyone... we weren't able to beat the chelsea that hez talking about at home even with a full squad so i don't get his reference plus other teams are strengthening strongly and will only get better... man utd with a mediocre team played us like we were some kids FH at OT and we had no injuries... IF WE DO NT SIGN STRIKER we are doomed cz it» l be harder to beat even the small teams

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..