They say ignorance of the law is no excuse, but I would think it should be in the case of a law proclaimed in force prior to the publication of its proclamation.
Not exact matches
On Tuesday, January 17th, former Speaker
of the House, Newt Gingrich
said that the only way he would ever support a Muslim for the presidency
of the United States is if that person would «commit in public to give up sharia» thereby continuing his trend to exhibit his
ignorance on the subject
of Islamic
law (sharia) as well as his
ignorance of the United States Constitution.
People close to the mayor
say these two examples do not show any
ignorance of the
law, nor any indication there is a failure on de Blasio's part to understand the nuances
of those
laws.
Ignorance of the
law,
of journalism,
of ethics, and
of the Heartland Institute, which emphatically does not
say that the world has not warmed, nor denies that CO2 may have have made some contribution to that.
It is not a valid legal argument to explain that you simply weren't aware
of the
law; you have probably heard the
saying, «
Ignorance is no excuse,» and it's not.