If you have something to
say in public then own your words.
Not exact matches
Sugar
said: «If [politicians] lie, which results
in massive decisions like leaving the European Union, or gaining votes
in a general election,
then this should be a criminal offence as it would be
in a
public company if I lied to my shareholders.»
That didn't happen
in 2014 and 2015; that is, if you assume Poloz
said then in private some of things he is now advocating
in public.
The agreement was part of a settlement following charges that Facebook «deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private, and
then repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made
public,» the FTC
said in a news release at the time.
«They never invited us for dinner,
then at the last minute they realized that optically it wasn't playing very well
in public for them, so they put out a statement that we didn't have dinner because I was tired,» Tillerson
said, according to a transcript of the interview.
«What Phil was
saying is, «If you don't know someone well enough
in my inner circle to be brought along to a meeting,
then I don't want to know you,»
says Godin, who adds being impermeable to the
public is generally bad for business.
«I realized,» he
says in an interview, «that if you generalized what a
public intellectual does to [creating] media objects» — i.e., not just books and essays — «
then one could possibly create software companies that had
public intellectual impact.»
Investigators are
said to be interested
in Trump's
public appeal
in a press conference on July 27, 2016, for Russia to recover deleted emails of Hillary Clinton,
then the Democratic presidential nominee.
Then there's the cost savings the two companies can potentially see by combining the two firms» headquarters
in Norwalk, Conn., consolidating administrative costs related to
public company requirements, and no longer having to pay fees to get leads from Kayak,
says Fitzgerald.
«The language
in the ruling is quite broad and if there's some other
public policy objective that a provincial government has
in mind and restricting trade is really just an incidental outcome,
then it's OK,» he
said.
Then,
in February, the former Uber engineer Susan Fowler wrote a
public blog post detailing what she
said was a history of sexual harassment at the company.
(Reuters)- Hostess Brands LLC, the maker of Twinkies and Ding Dongs,
said on Tuesday it will be bought
in a $ 725 million deal by an affiliate of private equity company Gores Group, which will
then take it
public.
Rachel Notley put it best: «Only
in Alberta would the government not get the irony of that,»
Then to make it even more ridiculous, Taylor
said the
public people should give him a year's grace before judging the effectiveness of the new Agency.
«If they're going to restore
public confidence
in this marketplace and if they're going to create the kind of reforms necessary, they're going to have to recognize the old days of just doing what they want, being subject to lawsuits now and
then, are over,» he
said.
The fact is that
in 2007, 2008 and 2009 funds were drawn from government resources, just like we
said in the budget, and
then from subsequent
public accounts.
The coalition
then crafted questions to determine where the politicians stack up when it comes to,
say, their stances on faith - based initiatives,
public prayer and support of the word «God»
in the Pledge of Allegiance.
If you (not * you *) are going to
say something controversial
in a
public,
then you should expect someone to call you on it and / or present another view, espcecially is a place such as this blog, about religion.
Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income...
In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased.
In such case it is either you are religious enough and
say your prayers often
then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly
in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased.
in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be
said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of
public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
In the question session, philosophy professor Jeff Jordan made the following observation to Dennett, «If Darwinism is inherently atheistic, as you say, then obviously it can't be taught in public schools.&raqu
In the question session, philosophy professor Jeff Jordan made the following observation to Dennett, «If Darwinism is inherently atheistic, as you
say,
then obviously it can't be taught
in public schools.&raqu
in public schools.»
THEIR riches and THEIR dictating
public policy
in the US is surely commendable... but if American Catholics and American cardinals dare
say anything
then surely they are hypocritic rich pompous turds...
For example, if what you
say in a
public debate makes more «sense» than what Driscoll
says,
then you're more than likely to gain support from the masses because your stance is more logical.
Mr Rushbrooke
said Sir Cliff had been left with «no option» but to take legal action and told the judge: «What we are talking about is using TV cameras to spy into someone's home at the time when their target is
in the most vulnerable position imaginable and
then serve it up to the British
public as the most sensational story imaginable.»
Public Information Officer Tara Humphries originally stated that police have one suspect «under control,»
then later
said there was nobody
in custody.
If a Christian child is not permitted to
say a prayer
in a
public school (which is the case
in many provinces)
then a Muslim should certainly not have access to special religious holidays.
Charity Release International
says the woman's brothers stripped her, paraded her
in public, robbed and kicked her,
then beat her unconscious.
It is sufficient to note that he came from very humble origins — a carpenter's family
in an obscure village; that he attracted no particular
public attention during the first thirty years of his life; and that he
then set forth to proclaim the advent of the «Kingdom of God» — the rule of God on earth which the prophets had
said would be established by the Messiah.
Karl Ludwig Schmidt demonstrated that the order of events
in the Gospels is not based upon a memory of the order of Jesus»
public ministry inherent
in the material, but rather is largely the contribution of the redactional process, which assembled unrelated stories,
sayings, and small individual collections for devotional purposes, and
then arranged them topically or theologically without any serious interest
in chronology or geography.
Then we have looked at
public prayer,
saying a great deal about its congruity with human nature and human life and attempting to show that it is both a duty and a privilege for anyone who would call himself a Christian
in any serious sense of the term.
Well, if the distinctions between «preaching» and «teaching» continue to hold true even here,
then Paul is instructing Timothy to proclaim, or announce,
in a
public setting what the Bible
says about the arrival of the Kingdom of God
in and through Jesus Christ.
Then there's the awkwardness of
public masturbation and groping the neighbor
in the dining room, about which Dr. Philip Sloane
says, «A lot of time, the activity we think of as sexually deviant behavior is just reaching out for intimacy.»
If 2008 is the year when we can begin,
in private and
in public to concede that we don't know all the answers,
then let us
say amen.»
Insofar as that view has sedimented itself
in public education, the media and therapeutic centers,
then I would
say there are Europeanizing pressures.
no doubt the papers made up this # 50 million to make the board look bad and tight (both are myths made up by press during the lean years), but they have
said in public they will back wenger with the big money on world class purchases,
then i believe they will.
just reading around and all if not most rags are
saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million
then we are
in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not
then poldolski will be sold
in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming
in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals
in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just
say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget
public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw
then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
«If what the
public wants is immediate and free access to the Olympics,
then the network needs to get a cable partner and show everything live, wall - to - wall, and get Bud Greenspan to do the show
in prime time, present a completely taped, movie - fied package,» he
says, invoking the name of the Olympics» most renowned film chronicler.
Never mind the general
public... Some examples: 1) the passenger
in front of us on our first flight, whom when my daughter was crying while we waited to take off and I
said something aloud such as «I'll nurse her once we take off and
then she'll be quiet», had to tell everyone around us that she was a nurse and that I was essentially a bad mom to not nurse my baby during takeoff (sorry lady, but the reason I bought her a seat was for her to be
in her car seat during takeoff as it's much safer than
in my arms nursing).
True — the word «sex» is not mentioned (unsuprisingly, being
in public), but if anyone has any doubt about this,
then ask yourself this question: if someone of the opposite sex was to walk up to you
in the street and
say to you «I want to take you, I want to hold you and I want to have you!»
I
said «Mom, if I can't do this
in a vegetarian restaurant
in Berkeley,
then what chance do we have nursing anywhere
in public?»
If we coddle them, protect them from anything that could ever be triggering by policing what everyone
says in public,
then we are not really being respectful or helpful, IMHO, however well intentioned we are.
But I would
say that the nipple shield is probably the major the major hurdle just because it didn't make it so much harder especially when you're
in public because you're trying to like to hold the baby and hold the shielding and get comfortable and I mean I could remember we were at the zoo and he was two months old and it was just before we got off the nipple shield but like trying to hold him and I was wearing him and carry him like keep him
in the right position keep the shield
in position and like we are out
in the sun there's people everywhere it was really hot and noisy and I just wanted to throw that nipple shield
in the trash right
then, I would have if he like, just gone with it but...
One Mom
said that her son was initially fascinated with
public restrooms and would love to go
in with her, but
then after being trained, he did not wan to go anymore.
I find it very interesting that you imply that because you have been published
in medical journals that means that your scientific data is the one that is correct, if
public media attention on your research is what you feel solidifies it as «right»
then wouldn't you have to
say that scientific data on the other end of the spectrum that has been published is «right» as well.
Midas will
then give them $ 42 worth of free car services
in exchange,
says Bob Troyer, Midas» director of
public relations.
He may have
said it a couple of times that why don't we just do formula because it would be a pain and as a new mom I was really struggling with doing this
in public and when you do, that was almost six years ago, and thankfully there has been more light shed on breastfeeding
in public and nursing
in public because I really didn't see any other moms nursing
in public then.
That might be the first place I breastfeed
in public as we asked questions, I was sitting there waiting and like I don't know why, though they must be ready to go [laughs] and so am sitting there and I had my baby and was he probably 5 weeks old and
in my head I was like
saying, «I should have been here sooner, I should have been here sooner», [laughs] which is irrelevant but that what's goes through your head and
then I was like I guess I just do it and it was the meanest thing because I'm sitting on the floor with my baby and I didn't have to use the cover and I was just so «Oh, you just have to do it like
in a room full of women» and everybody is
in just as uncomfortable and everybody is trying to make this dance work and trying to get a rhythm and they needed this thing to be able to do and I would imagine for me it was a good transition to being
in publicand not to worry about the cover but also for women like ok, this is your group for example.
I mean, it's one thing if you're actually feeding the baby
in public —
then no one should
say anything about what you may be showing.
My attention has been drawn to a video which captures the Member of Parliament for Dome / Kwabenya, Deputy Majority Leader and Minister of State at the Presidency
in charge of
Public Procurement, the Hon. Sarah Adwoa Safo claiming
in the
said video that the Community Senior High School constructed and commissioned
in her constituency during the tenure of President John Dramani Mahama was as a result of her personal intervention with the World Bank, that the Senior High School was not from the
then NDC Government and that with the exception of the Dome / Kwabenya Senior High School project, all the other schools constructed during the previous NDC administration were executed
in NDC strongholds.
Paladino also praised a man he just recently was quoted as calling a «degenerate idiot» — former Gov. George Pataki —
saying his fellow Republican «put his own political best interests aside for the
public good» by insisting
in 2002 that the minor party gubernatorial candidates be included
in debates along with his Democratic opponent,
then - state Comptroller H. Carl McCall.
Rosemary Bechler (RB): Few of us understood the full import of what Ken Macdonald QC, former Director of
Public Prosecutions, was
saying at the Convention of Modern Liberty
in 2009 when he referred to the
then just published paper by Sir David Omand on the effect of modern data mining and processing techniques on intelligence work.
But there are various hybrid methods too: for example, there could still be rules about who can stand (eg being a party member for a year or whatever); there could be a nomination process within party structures; and
then a vote open to either the general
public or to anybody nominating themselves as a supporter I am not sure -
in practice - whether there is much difference between an «anybody can come along» and «you have to
say «I'm Labour».