Sentences with phrase «say its characters because»

Not exact matches

The company, which lets its 200 - million - plus users post messages of up to 140 characters to their followers, is «interesting,» he says, because it appears to have succeeded where Facebook initially failed: in mobile advertising.

Because Gilliam says they're «looking at the person first and the business second,» contestants are put through various challenges to test their character and ideas in situ.

This is a fun character because he acts like such a idiot at times, but then out of no where he says something that is rather profound or makes an astute observation.

Even if Mormons believed that «The characters Lehi, Nephi, Laman, and Lemule were the founding Jews from which all inhabitants of the Americas descended,» which they don't, the DNA test of the American Indians wouldn't refute that because the book says that all the descendants of Nephi perished, and the descendants of Laman and Lemuel were changed from white to dark, i.e., their race was changed, so of necessity, their DNA was changed, too, unless all races have the same DNA, which I doubt.

If in the case of the movie Contact again, even if Foster's character stayed with him, bought him presents, took care of him when sick, got him b - day cards or cried at his funeral, someone could always say «Well she could be a psychopath and is just pretending to love him because its expected of her or she expects to get something out it like inheritance.»

Authoritarian pastoring («You need to follow what I say because you're under my authority as your pastor») hides its «lording over» character in scriptural underpinnings.

He points to the Book of James, which says we must value the trials in our life because they shape our character.

Well, I wouldn't bluntly say no because he doesn't believe there's a God, but I would investigate his character and arrogance.

He went on to say: «The other arts — architecture, painting, vestments, and the arts of movement — each contribute to and support the beauty of the liturgy, but still the art of music is greater even than that of any other art, because it forms a necessary or integral part of the solemn liturgy, because it is so intimately bound to the sacred action, defining and differentiating the various parts in character, motion and importance.»

They give the finger to God and say, screw you, we're going to keep being evil, then God judges them because He is JUST, and His character demands that He be just, otherwise He'd violate His nature.

Lin memorized a few Bible verses, Chen says, including a passage from Paul's letter to the Romans in the New Testament that reads in part: «We also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope.»

It must be said, of course, in order not to blur the fallacy in Bergson's method, that he chose intuition as being a mode of apprehension most appropriate to a concern with internal relations precisely because he failed to note or to acknowledge the structural or contextual character of such relations as an external pattern of existence as well.

On the other hand, however, it must be said that Just because of its special character spirituality must be left much freedom to realize itself in an individual way which can not be commanded and institutionalized.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

For example, criticism of the gospels has been enhanced through study of the chreia, a short and pithy saying recorded and attributed to a famous character because it was regarded as useful for living.

This is the concept of that beyond which thought can not go, in which it completes its search for understanding, at which it really affirms only itself, and through which it relates all else.2 Leaving aside his views on its historical character, this is what R. G. Collingwood seems to be suggesting when he says that Anselm's argument does not prove «that because our idea of God is an ideal of id quo maius cogitari nequit therefore God exists, but that because our idea of God is an idea of id quo maius cogitari nequit we stand committed to belief in God's existence.

They remain so, one character says, because they behave as they did in Eden.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative.

«Incalculable and unaccountable», I say, for the narratives constantly betray a baffled wonderment; but not magical or irrational, because they are congruous with the account which Jesus gave of the character of God: the «Father in heaven», who is «good» with a goodness beyond justice, (Mark 10:18; Matthew 5: 45; Luke 6: 35; Matthew 20: 1 - 15) supported by sufficient power; (Mark 10: 27, 14:36) and who persistently takes the initiative in giving good gifts to His creatures.

It may well be said that the [acceptance of man] in - spite - of [his sin] character of the Christian faith, by means of prophetic criticism and the «will to transform» based upon divine justice, functions as a militant element in the realm of human society and history, whereas the just - because - of [human sin and selfishness acceptance] nature of Buddhist realization,... functions as a stabilizing element running beneath all social and historical levels.

Sometimes I worry that people of goodwill miss out on important conversations because they are scared off, so fearful of saying something wrong and having their character and motives questioned that they retreat to the safe and familiar — often returning to the privileged, closed - off communities from which they came.

He said this is so because these symbols have a double character.

Is it not possible to say, therefore, that the concept of merely becoming - otherwise is inconceivable, on the grounds that the character of being - otherwise which comes about, is a reality different from what preceded it, and therefore, because new, requires to be produced and needs a sufficient cause, which must be sought within the cosmic domain?

but yeah there are a few churches that are maybe true but you have to decern what is the truth and what is not by testing the church you belong to God does give you the gift of Dicernment to find out what is right and what is wrong, «but do nt Judge a persons character just because he says this church or this church is doing something wrong cause for all we know he maybe right.

Panexperientialism resists the completely deterministic interpretation of this idea, according to which the temporally prior condition fully determines every present event: When the event in question is an individual occasion of experience, it has a mental pole, which is partly self - determining (In Whitehead's words, the ontological principle «could also be termed the «principle of efficient, and final, causation,»» because it says that «every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason either in the character of some actual entity in the actual world of that concrescence or in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24].)

To which I would say, by that standard, Socrates was a fictional character because he is only mentioned in the writings that are attributed to Plato.

And of course all atheist and free - thinker organizations were banned in 1933, right when Hitler came into power, and secular schools were closed, with Hitler saying: «Secular schools can never be tolerated because such schools have no religious instruction... all character training and religion must be derived from faith.»

Suffice it to say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept because it seems to do justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which such decisions bring about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of things in that universe.

You said, «You continue to impugn the character of God because of the system of Hell.»

Arguing that some criticism has been trivial, Stuart added: «If it's people saying «I didn't like it because God was a black woman», I don't really have a lot of time for that because ultimately, if you read the story, you understand exactly why God chooses to present himself to the lead character, Mack, in that way.»

Unfortunately I am too scared to share my own recipe for pumpkin pancakes because my blender is ancient and doesn't really work, so my pancakes are hand - mixed and shall we say, have «character» in their bumps.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

Turns out, Woods» stint as «Mac Daddy Santa» was not a one - off; in fact, Woods revives the character every Christmas because his children «love it... when I do something crazy,» the almost -42-year-old father of two said in an interview this week.

«At the latter stages of a season they come unstuck because of that lack of — I hate to say it — a real lack of character or spine within the team.

Sometimes i do nt understand some people saying thing like Benzema is not what we need and that he is not that good.Some people lack reasoning to be very honest.They do nt think before talking.I wonder why people say that because when you watched him from his first season up to this season he really is that good.Some arsenal legends are saying we need him almost everyone is saying so too.We need him and stop judging his character because you have no right to judge anyone.Giroud is an average striker and i am not judging him from yesterday's game i am judging him from season 1 to this season.He is nothing special and has never been.

Statement is baffling and is in fact the very thing that guys like cap and others are fighting against the truth is Colin didn't orignaly kneel during the anthem he sat on his bench he was then approached by vets who asked why he was sitting and asked him to do something else because sitting was disprectful it was those army vets who told cap to kneel because it shows your fighting against something and not just sitting to sit they told him it would be a better look and it's funny how people turn around and say he is disrespecting the very people who told him what to do and how to do it to get his message across this is the ignorance of America and everything cap fights against you judge a man by the color of his skin and his upbringing and not the content of his character you don't know anything about cap yet you pull this entire story out your ass go sit down clown

«During my NFL career, trying to go to an NFL career, I got back on a couple of agents that some teams wouldn't accept me because I had bad character,» Lane said.

Keane said we don't have players with character, and he's spot on, but we don't have them because they will disrupt Arsene's dictatorship.

I say that, because, according to the rules for Hall of Fame voting, you must consider the integrity and the character of the candidates.

at him because he's a character who acts like a huge dick and then says «ALSO AMERICA SUCKS!»

I was very careful not to say anything about Mike Schmidt's character, because I don't know the man and that's not really relevant.

«I was hoping because of Jim O'Brien's character and work ethic that he'd become comfortable with me,» Ainge says, «but mainly I'm just looking for a coach to help me win.»

and im sure when you choke out «the star of the company» on 10 days notice you would not show a joint on tv to say «hey look at me im cool», thats just how they are and thats it, if people do nt like them its fun but you cant say they are putting on a «character» because they are certainly not doing that.

«At the latter stages of a season they come unstuck because of that lack of - I hate to say it - a real lack of character or spine within the team.»

He said: «In a way we have had a major sea - change in the last three months because we wanted to draw a line under what had gone on last season and almost reboot it, start all over again and we have tried to get the right type of player in terms of not only the way they play but also the type of characters involved to take us forward.»

But it's the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network that is squawking over J.Lo's «Monster - in - Law,» saying it is insensitive to people with food allergies because of a scene in which Jane Fonda's character sneaks nuts into the food of her hated and highly allergic daughter - in - law, played by Lopez.

Tots love it because of the exciting character meet - and - greets; wet - and - wild fun — let's just say a kid's paradise.

We're at a standstill because depending on the location, the skate park takes on a different character,» he said.

I say «kind of» because he won't actually be limited to 140 characters in his answers, since he'll reply via live online video.

When, for example, he attracts criticism for saying he admires Vladimir Putin in a magazine interview, Alastair Campbell is blamed for having «trapped» him into saying it; when he loses the first TV debate it's because he allowed himself «to be persuaded to act out of character»; and when it comes to the declining value of Brent crude Salmond writes breezily that «no - one really knows what the price of oil is going to be in the short term», despite having spent several years arguing precisely the contrary.