Shadow attorney general Dominic Grieve appeared to break ranks to
say more grammar schools should be built in his local area if there is demand.
Furthermore, he appears to have slipped into a U-turn -
saying more grammar schools could be built 16 days after he started a Tory row by insisting there would be no more grammar schools.
Not exact matches
A Department for Education source
said that the Queen's Speech was an unambiguous decision not to go ahead with creating
more grammar schools.
Mr Farage
said a number of his policies — such as one to bring back
more grammar schools - appealed to Tory MPs who were slavishly voting «for a leader who appears to be
more of a social democrat».
He
said: «An altogether
more structured and systematic approach to learning
grammar, spelling and punctuation in primary
schools means children were becoming
more confident in tackling challenging writing tasks».
He
said: «The Liberal Democrats are the party of education, and that means we believe in an excellent education for all, so any plans to bring in
more divisive
grammar schools will be utterly opposed by my party.
Powell has
said that selective education «creates barriers for disadvantaged children» and has called on Prime Minister Theresa May to rethink proposals to allow
more grammar schools to open.
Speaking to the Guardian, Farron
said: «The Liberal Democrats are the party of education, and that means we believe in an excellent education for all, so any plans to bring in
more divisive
grammar schools will be utterly opposed by my party.
She
said: «Teachers and heads in the thousands of existing state
schools in the UK which are facing real - terms cuts in funding for their pupils will be dismayed to see the Chancellor throwing
more money at free
schools and
grammar schools.
Jenny Whittle, chairman of the council's
grammar schools and social mobility select committee,
said: «We can't impose our recommendations, but I really do believe that there is a spirit of co-operation and a real willingness to see
more children from poorer backgrounds benefit from a selective education.»
Speaking in London, while also announcing plans to open new
grammar schools, May
said the 50 per cent cap was an obstacle that was stopping
more good faith
schools opening and
said that the government should «confidently promote» the role that faith
schools play in a diverse
school system.
Speaking to the Guardian, Alan Milburn, the former Labour cabinet minister who chairs the government's social mobility commission, has
said that
grammars lead to social selection and warned that in England's current 163 selective state
schools pupils were four or five times
more likely to come from independent prep
schools than from the most disadvantaged backgrounds.
The Ofsted official has argued
grammars» higher rating may be due to «
more effective teaching», while Mr Widdows, deputy head teacher at Giles Acadamy in Lincolnshire,
said the claim was an «insult» to teachers in other
schools.
But Powell
says that
more than half of
grammar - sponsored
schools (53 per cent) and university - sponsored
schools (57 per cent) are less than good.
«You might expect that where you have
more grammar schools, you will have
more of the really top students, that's not what we've seen,»
said Mr Schleicher.
The government
says that providing
more grammar school places would give extra opportunities for poorer pupils.
Committee chair, Neil Carmichael,
said that since the plans for
more grammars had been announced «the air has been thick with the sound of claims and counter-claims on the benefits and disadvantages of
grammar schools».
Education Secretary Justine Greening has published plans calling for
more selective
schools in England, and a Department for Education spokesman
said any new
grammars would «prioritise the admission of disadvantaged pupils».
Commenting on the Education Select Committee's report on the Government's case for creating new
grammar schools, Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL),
said: «The Government has failed to provide evidence that
more selection in
schools will improve education for all children and not harm the majority.
A Department for Education spokesman
said: «We know that
grammar schools provide a good education for their disadvantaged pupils, and we want
more pupils from lower - income backgrounds to benefit from that.»
She
said: «When we add
more grammar school places to an area, these
schools will have to fill their places with children who are further down the ability scale.
A Department for Education spokesperson
said grammar schools provided «a good education for their disadvantaged pupils», adding: «we want
more pupils from lower income backgrounds to benefit from that».
«Simply allowing
more disadvantaged pupils to attend
grammar schools will not create the systematic improvement needed for a world - class education system,» he
said.
Research author and associate director at EPI, Jo Hutchinson,
said the decline in the benefits of
grammar school education would be seen most in areas with
more selection.
Labour oppose the creation of
more grammar schools saying that instead of improving equality, they make it worse.
But she
said there would not be a return of a «binary system» of
grammars and secondary moderns and that the changes were part of a package of reform, including greater involvement of universities and independent
schools in the state system and the opening of
more faith
schools.
There was
said to be backbench disquiet that the push for
more selection had been sidelined - and there will be scrutiny of whether Mr Hinds, a former
grammar school boy, will be
more sympathetic.
The same analysis for secondary
schools shows
grammar schools, academically selective at age 11, are by far the most biased towards
more affluent pupils -LRB--98.8 percentage points)-- suggesting they aren't quite the «engines of social mobility» some
grammar school advocates
say they are.
The Department for Education
said there were no plans to end academic selection in
grammars schools, but there may be
more collaboration between them and non-selective
schools.
«We have serious issues about social mobility, in particular white working - class young people, and I don't think that having
more grammar schools is going to help them,» he
said.
Yet despite the DfE report stating that the PISA data «provided little support» to arguments that academic selection boost the progress of the most disadvantaged pupils, ministers
said the PISA results support plans for
more grammar schools.
«Pupils in
grammar schools make significantly
more progress relative to their similarly - able peers,» he
said, adding that ministers wanted to ensure that children from disadvantaged backgrounds «have the opportunity to benefit from selective
schools».
A Department for Education spokeswoman
said: «The government consultation puts forward proposals to allow
more grammar school places to be created, making them a realistic choice for
more parents, but only on the basis that strict conditions are met to ensure this also contributes to the improvement of other parts of the
school system.»
KCC has
said it is looking for better social mobility, allowing
more children from all walks of life to get into
grammar schools.
She tells BBC Radio 4's The World at One that she is in favour of
more grammar schools saying they «are a welcome addition to the choice on offer to parents» and that they will be «a 21st century model of
grammar school».
But he also
said the higher ratings given to
grammar schools might be because their teaching was «
more effective».
BBC Education Editor Branwen Jeffreys
says the statement clears the way for draft plans to be brought forward, including Theresa May's proposals for
more grammar schools in England.
Similarly only 61 per cent of respondents thought that
grammar schools achieved the aim of producing children who are «confident and self - assured adults», only slightly
more than the 58 per cent who
said this about the secondary moderns.
Mary Bousted, the general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, accused the chancellor of «throwing
more money at
grammar schools», and
said the government's spending pledges were «totally insufficient» to tackle the wider funding crisis in
schools.
A Department for Education spokesperson
said: «The Sutton Trust itself has highlighted the positive impact
grammar schools can have on pupils from less well - off backgrounds and that's exactly why we want
more young people to benefit.
He
said he believed there was «overwhelming support from parents» for
more grammar school places.
I do not think that it is tenable in a country that has
grammars and selection for the Opposition to
say they do not like that situation, but that they do not want us to take any steps whatever to see how we can deliver
more strongly on social mobility through the
schools already in place.
Sir Michael
said an «altogether
more structured and systematic approach to learning
grammar, spelling and punctuation» in primary
schools meant children were «becoming
more confident in tackling challenging writing tasks».
Councillor Brigid Jones, cabinet member for
schools at Birmingham City Council,
said that the policy of
grammar schools «bending their admissions criteria» to allow
more disadvantaged children showed the «absolute fallacy in the 11 - plus system».
He
said grammar schools should look again at their admissions policies and ensure they were making provision for children from disadvantaged areas or with special needs, even if that means altering the entrance requirements, and do
more outreach work in deprived areas.
More than a third (38 %) of people say they believe that the government should build more grammar schools and encourage more schools to select by academic abil
More than a third (38 %) of people
say they believe that the government should build
more grammar schools and encourage more schools to select by academic abil
more grammar schools and encourage
more schools to select by academic abil
more schools to select by academic ability.