Sentences with phrase «say scientists on both sides»

The physics behind this impact - volcano combo is not firm, say scientists on both sides of the debate.

Not exact matches

The difficulty was, that to say so, even for a scientist with the factsat his fingertips, was to go against a powerful and intolerant conventional wisdom: «We liberals», he wrote, «who work in the fields of global HIV / AIDS and family planning take terrible professional risks if we side with the pope on a divisive topic such as this.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

On the positive side, most of the whistleblowers profiled by The Scientist say that given the choice, they would do it all over again.

On the plus side, Mark Citron, vice president of clinical and regulatory affairs at TyRx Pharma in Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, a combination cardiac device manufacturer, says it's much easier for entry - level scientists to find jobs at MD&D companies.

«On one side this gives us some time,» says Caminiti, who believes that the moratorium is an attempt to appease scientists while winking at animal rights activists.

«I don't disagree that there were unhappy scientists on all three sides,» says Gehrels.

I know we have, they say they have science on one side but then they also have those horrible emails that were sent between the scientists.

Kofman says an informal vote among Rosetta scientists came down narrowly on the side of looking for Philae.

But genetics is not open only to biologists and medical scientists; even mathematicians can get involved in genetics on the analytical side, Zeggini says.

«It's going to be a huge step forward,» says Steve Squyres at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, lead scientist for the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity, which landed on different sides of the planet in 2004.

«Until Juno's arrival, our understanding of Jupiter's atmosphere was based on what we can see from the side, near the equator,» says Steven M. Levin, a Juno project scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in an email.

When we take a position that isn't willing to embrace evolution, when we take a position that basically runs counter to what 98 of 100 climate scientists have said, what the National Academy of Science — Sciences has said about what is causing climate change and man's contribution to it, I think we find ourselves on the wrong side of science, and, therefore, in a losing position.

As I said, I am not a scientist, but have honest questions about the weaknesses on both sides of this issue.

Scientists say the record drought is due in part to the expansion of the Hadley Cell — the atmospheric regions on both sides of the equator that circulates warm tropical air poleward — which is known climate change signal.

I agree on very many issues with you, but I can not avoid the impression that the animosity in both ways between you and some of the other climate scientists is due to unwillingness to understand, what the other side is really saying.

He said, the speakers on the opposition side were «not scientists».

It's a bit cheap, given that there's no evidence or even likelihood, that actual climate scientists are responsible for this hoax, to say that jumping to very firm conclusions on very little evidence, and indeed fraudulently improving the evidence that doesn't quite show what you want it to, are characteristic of one side of this debate rather than the other.

Peter Gleick's career isn't over despite the big scar linked to his duping the Heartland Institute, says Kevin Trenberth, an atmospheric scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. «I think this pushes Peter in the direction of getting even more involved on the side of being an advocate,» Trenberth told ME on Friday.

Over the past several months, the Arctic Ocean on the opposite side of the world has also seen record - low sea ice — a new nadir in a decades - long decline that, climate scientists say, is one of the many fingerprints of humans» hand in warming Earth's atmosphere and oceans through the burning of fossil fuels.

Here is a list of 31,487 scientist who have signed a petition saying they don't believe in Global Warming, the closest thing I could find on the other side is where 375 scientists signed this letter telling you not to pull out of the Paris Agreement.

I doubt most of what is said on either side about scientists on the other applies to more than one in twenty as a statement that could be even remotely considered arguable.

(I suppose my comment could also apply to Lindzen, Spencer, and Christy's comments outside the peer - reviewed venue where I do think they have said some unfortunate things, but that wasn't the primary issue... and, as you noted, scientists on both sides of the debate sometimes make questionable statements in the public realm.)

In other words, the claims should be heard, along with the relevant context, and not just the one sided claims in a vacuum, or «balanced» by non balancing he said / she said statements like; «climate scientists on the other hand say the earth is slowly warming and is likely to increasingly do so in the future.»

@TerjeP (say Tay - a) Most of the scientists working in climate related science are not on a «side», they are not all in total agreement with each other and they are not all putting forward a narrow unifying theory, despite the way they are being grouped into a straw man by mischief makers.

Further, the fact that they're looking for something that doesn't exist says that the number of qualified scientists and engineers on their side is rather limited, or perhaps zero.