Sentences with phrase «say something about why»

I'd like to see Roger Pielke Sr. say something about why he thought Triana was cancelled.

If they say something about why you chose to be gay, just ask them if they chose to be white (or African American, or Asian, or Latino... substitute as necessary).

«The conception of the package is an opportunity for developers to say something about why the package is important and why it is created,» he said.

When you see someone like Rondo push himself to return when he could very easily have gone to the hospital, it says something about why he plays, and money isn't the whole story.»

Not exact matches

«Why waste time talking about something that's not legitimate,» he said.

When pressed about why he never noticed an extra plane, Immelt said it was not something he was paying attention to at GE.

He also rejected to bet against the virtual currency market by saying that «Why in the world should I take a long or short position of something I don't know anything about?»

Trying to worry about why someone wrote crap is like wondering when a liar is going to say something true.

Obviously they're not true atheist if they would even read an article about religion, because according to their beliefs, after this life, there is nothing, so why do they feel the need to comment on something they say doesn't exist?

Many people can complain about a variety of things that plague their neighborhoods and often say things like, «Why doesn't someone do something?»

But why read a story about, say Lent, and then take all that time and energy to make a nasty response about something you don't believe in?

and being aware of your environment, being respectful of those of all beliefs and none beliefs, and of our world, and its about personal responsibility, with that said why is is such a bad thing to believe in something greater than yourself, how can somebody live there life without believing in something, what kind of life is that, life is meant to be discovered, its one big mystery, and all the science in the world can still not prove how we exactly came to be?

The question we can most fruitfully ponder and say something about is why we are here, as a body, making this particular beginning.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

If a person would have written the Bible out of his own imagination about something that happened hundreds of years before, why would he have said G - d gave the Torah to Moses in front of the entire Jewish people?

And my point about the sun stopping, is that it was something that happened once, thousands of years ago, and it is certainly possible that no one wrote anything down about, with of course the exception that it was recorded in the Bible And when I said the latter, I mean the second of the two things you thought I might be talking about And I was asking who you meant when you said you didn't understand why he didn't kill everyone but Joshua.

I asked him why, and he told me about something in his life that he was trying to change, and said that when it finally changed, he was going to cut his beard.

If you are going to say something about a scientific fact, give specific examples of why the fact is not a fact or is being misinterpreted.

I want to say something about the way in which reflection upon Jesus» own faith in God led to the historic formulations of orthodox Christianity, and why these doctrinal constructions are important, both because of what they positively affirm and because we can not revise or replace them unless we understand what they were intended to do.

Jordan, why don't you say something with substance, so it can be talked about?

if they do nt follow the rules of burial it will cause turmoil on muslims, creating even more hatred, do nt just say something about burning because its forbidden for us, even the most dangerous living has his own proper burial, now because of this is just like telling no show no respect to other religion, why did your bible thought you that or it wasn, t mention in it, why you really thinks this do you think you are the only people in this world

When I feel like I have something worthwhile to say but am not given the time of day, I like to imagine all the reasons why these people won't hear me — they are so satisfied with their own salvation, they don't care about anyone else; they are afraid to look critically at their elaborate theological systems because they find so much security in them; they are stupid; they are prideful; they are coldhearted.

When we read verses such as I Corinthians 14:26 about each one of us having something to say, we wondered why that never happened.

Kinda like something, omg, a religious person would say... Regardless, why would you care about changing one person's mind?

why is there the need when you say something completely positive about teenagers for someone else to point out their flaws!?

= > I do nt think it's crazy at all to say to a person «why do you think it is valid to criticize something that you know nothing about, and have repeatedly said you have no interest in learning about?»

I am not a huge fan of green tea but I think I have had it a few times lately — I don't like coffee or regular tea — something about it doesn't agree with me but it isn't the caffeine — I always say that is why I need chocolate — for a caffeine hit

As we shared our views about life, and why we each do what we currently do, I found myself agreeing with what she said — life is simply too short to do something you don't love.

I know I will get the question about subbing something else for blue cheese (but why???? YUM), so I'm going to cut all you blue cheese haters off at the pass and just say here that you can definitely just add more cheddar or some pepper jack or any other cheese you prefer.

There was a note with the box that said something about applying sparingly, which I ignored but soon realized why I shouldn't have.

It's so funny why this news will be coming out now, everyone knew Sanchez has been clamouring for a pay rise for a long time now and the sill old man came out and said something about the club not been held at ransom by some players» ridiculous offers....

Yes, Joel got his chance because of injuries, and he took that chance big time, which is why AW said he sensed something special about the young man.

There's something to be said about the uniqueness and spontaneity of Bautista's flip, which would explain why it took over the Internet for a while.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Statement is baffling and is in fact the very thing that guys like cap and others are fighting against the truth is Colin didn't orignaly kneel during the anthem he sat on his bench he was then approached by vets who asked why he was sitting and asked him to do something else because sitting was disprectful it was those army vets who told cap to kneel because it shows your fighting against something and not just sitting to sit they told him it would be a better look and it's funny how people turn around and say he is disrespecting the very people who told him what to do and how to do it to get his message across this is the ignorance of America and everything cap fights against you judge a man by the color of his skin and his upbringing and not the content of his character you don't know anything about cap yet you pull this entire story out your ass go sit down clown

Asking same questions about why th fuk don't the board react and say something??? Ffs it's Groundhog Day and NOTHING IS DONE ABOUT Iabout why th fuk don't the board react and say something??? Ffs it's Groundhog Day and NOTHING IS DONE ABOUT IABOUT IT!!!!

Why are any of us surprised what was said at the AGM no one really grills anyone and it's the same questions asked about a lousy 3 million that went to one of Stans company for management fees or something who cares about pocket change, and every year the management are always saying that they have confidence in the team to do well and yes they do up to a level

i think the only one i remember u said something nice about was wilshere... yeah of course u can still support arsenal but i do nt understand why u do that: / because i think it must be reeeeaaaallly hard for u... like an endotherm reaction... you get more hate and anger (negativity) from supporting arsenal than getting happiness (positivity)

Instead of saying the stadium is packed with tourists and always quiet, why don't the players give us something to cheer about consistently for starters.

I'd like to address the people who abuse me at the comments, because unlike Arsene I like to hear what people say and improve the content I am giving them by asking you to explain why you believe he should stay and give counter-arguments to what you don't like about me, because abusing something is weak.

Guys why are we comparing arsenal to barca i love arsenal it my club but i must be realistic barca is lite years infront of us look at the champions league last year no match they have won the champions league twice in the last five years and the last one with kids just like arsenal so its not about how young players are because if your good enough your old enough and am afraid the arsenal youngsters walcott, deneilson, nasri, diaby, bendtner, even the great vanpercy who all arsenal fans rate who as i mentioned before (Has not scored a free kick in god knows how long) world class right these players so far have not been good enoughso do nt blame injuries too much do nt blame refs look at the way arsenal do things something is wrong here is a prime example eboue joined arsenal in the 2004/2005 season to date now tell me that a long time right would you say he is a much better player than when he arrived i think no he has improved but only very little and thats the point football is a short business at a big club you spend three seasons for the most and then you must perform.

It's short (something that can't be said about any of my posts) and pithy and hit me right between the eyes because it's the essence of why parenting's so hard emotionally.

I asked why she chose to breastfeed me and I was expecting a really lovely, philosophical, attachment pareting type answer... she was so passionate about breastfeeding, surely she had something magical to say about this.

I know this is off the topic but I needed to vent my husband is taking care of the baby well I was cooking and making tea all of a sudden my husband yells and says come here I need help I say just a minute then I go and I said why did you yell, he said he pinched me with my glasses I said you do not need to yell hes nust a baby he got mad at me and through either the tablet aand case or just the case fortunately the baby and I were out of the way someti es it seems he only cares about himself sorry avainbut nor ally when something upsets or botbers me I could talk to my husband but we cant it just makes himall the more mad

About 25 % of the time the cause of death can be attributed to something like strangulation or suffocation, which is why they say to keep stuffed animals and soft bedding out of your baby's crib.

«As we keep it about the issues and as long as we keep moving New York state in the right direction, the best way is to be engaged, not sitting in a minority on the sidelines with 31 Democrats,» he said, adding, «The reason why we started at four and we're now eight — we must be doing something right — is because it's all about the issues.»

Me: Why new labour should also have had something to say about bank bonuses http://www.nextleft.org/2009/12/new-labour-case-for-bank-bonus-tax.html

But here's something to think about — when Obama is describing what he and his administration would do, why does he so often say «I» instead of «we?»

(Con, sort of, you know her) She is saying something about a school which can't become a free school but isn't being told why.