Not exact matches
He
said: «It turns out Marlon Brando had it easy,
because when it comes to Congress there's no
such thing as an offer they can't refuse.»
Chasing returns doesn't work, she
says,
because investments are volatile, and there's no
such thing as a guaranteed return.
«Choupette is
such a strange
thing because I never thought that I could fall in love with an animal like this,»
says designer and its owner, Karl Lagerfeld.
Don't
say you want to start a circus
because you love animals but disregard the fact that you don't understand
things such as maintenance, real estate, insurance and marketing.
The whitepaper does not
say anything about why they will be able to do
things Vitalik can not (
such as have 2 ⁹² self - rebalancing shards), and it is insane to
say it's
because he can't hard fork Ethereum ¹.
I think there's a lot of amazing people that don't get to college, not only that do
things like I do but
because their voices just aren't heard in the tsunami of people that apply every year to colleges in
such an economic impacted school system here which we have here in America where people have to go into massive amounts of debt just to go to college and get an education,» he
said.
Stephenson tries not to let his literary access to the corridors of power go to his head: «I go to elaborate lengths to try to shut out all awareness of
such things,
because it would make it very hard to write,» he
says.
She explained: «Our child - friendly space experts are
saying they're really excited
because you know, just giving these kids a space to play, be kids again after they've experienced
such traumatic
things is so important and we're hoping these teddy bears can make a tiny difference.»
Most of us blow off steam and
say things that wouldn't withstand sharp critical scrutiny
because they aren't intended to do any
such thing.
The author has a baseless story, and it really doesn't matter,
because by her
saying such thing is a persecution by it self.
Really, are you
saying that
because people do it there is no
such thing as surpreme being?
If you have left the church
because of
such things, I can't
say I blame you.
Jesus used those words «get behind me, Satan,»
because that is what Satan would want — but He was not
saying that Peter was Satan or a devil or any
such thing.
The Spirit of God has
said from the Book of Genesis,
Because you have done
such thing!
Kinda like those «Western Values» that
said there is no
such thing as spousal ràpe,
because according to their bible, a wife can not refuse her husband?
Or if you were witness to that lovable young man's beautiful enthusiasm when he read and heard of the great men who fought with a heavy destiny and suffered badly in the world, the glorious ones whom earth renounced
because it was not worthy of them, would you dare, when no clamor caused your speech to wander but when the stillness of intimacy, of the lovable one's confidence, the in experience of the young man, all obliged you to tell the truth; at
such a time would you dare lay your hand on your heart and say, «Such things no longer hap
such a time would you dare lay your hand on your heart and
say, «
Such things no longer hap
Such things no longer happen.
I suppose you are
saying that believers
say god could do
such things without remaining detected,
because he is omnipotent.
Am sure he would have not had half the courage to
say any
thing that is considered Anti-Semitic
because the Jews would have aided the floor with his head and his broom like hair... he is just surfing the waves that are coming against Islam and Muslims... to appear courages like many who take advantage of
such uprising situations...
The fresh point of view possible precisely
because I am not you may be just the
thing for solving a stalemated quandary, but what we ordinarily mean when we
say such things is «If I were myself in your place.»
When government officials begin to
say such things, as ours clearly have, then that is the time for challenge,
because when a government does that, it is beginning to play God over our lives, and the taste of
such identification is a very heady
thing.
There are indeed many intelligent, sincere, well - meaning people who
say such things as: «Whatever the controversy, and however strong the scholarly arguments against it, I choose to believe in the supernatural aspects of my faith, simply
because it is very important for me in the life of my faith to be radically aware of sacred mysteries.»
But you shall go down to your High Priest and shall pray him on our behalf to send me a hundred men skilled in your religion who before these idolators may be able to reprove what they do and may
say to them that they know and can do
such things but will not,
because they are done by diabolical art and through evil spirits, and may so restrain them that they may not have power to do
such things in their presence.
Better to
say that even if it does not,
such a shift to the right will happen again and again
because the one good
thing about being in the observation car is that you can see with some clarity where you have been.
Yes i know two counsellors i told one of them about this and i want to know why Jesus Christ without any mercy sends that person to hell forever to suffer and never ever forgives them even though they didn't commit any
thing like murder and that also forever you can forgive that person went in minutes of that sin with in a snap of a finger then only why that sin why not give him another life in Earth after forgiving and punishing him for the rest of his sin it is
said that god and Jesus Is very merciful then why he is giving
such a life sentence that is much more worse than eternal nothingness and why doesn't he punish Satun with eternal nothingness
because i think most of the sins in Earth are committed
because of him only?
It is very important that Luke tells us
such thing about them,
because look what he
says next in Luke 1:7.
Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have
said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function
because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay
because of that i just
said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did
such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad
thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can
say is that it went really well and
because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz
This is not
because such words are supposed to have some kind of vitalistic tinge which will redeem what we have to
say from apparent mechanistic suggestions, but
because they are in fact required for any genuine understanding of the world and any sound explanation of how
things come to be.
So when a family gets in a car accident and the husband and wife escape, but their children die in a ball of flame when the car explodes, their Calvinistic pastor
says that while we don't understand why
such things are God's will, we must trust that God knows what He is doing
because everything happens is according to His will.
So if you do nt do the
things that God
says to do you do nt receive the blessings, most
such as yourself see this and
say God is unjust
because He is making all the bad
things in the world and the US happen, which is incorrect.
The reason why I have
said such things as, «Forget about the churches for the moment,» is simply
because I think that an entirely new, unprejudiced grasp of the God - man relation is essential for our generation.
However, when Christians
say that they believe that they have a heavenly father I'm disinclined to believe them
because such things are not only not common, but have never been proven by evidence anywhere.
Which is, of course, one of the points we have to keep making about Pius XII, who had to make excruciating decisions about what to
say and what not to
say,
because people would suffer and die if he
said the wrong
thing, but who receives from his critics no
such understanding as Roosevelt receives here.
One might even
say that God loves us enough to wish us to tell him these
things although he also loves us enough to have ordered the world in
such a way that many of these
things will not be ours
because they are not really good for us.
He ended: «I do not
say these
things because there is a need of either my teachings or my warnings for
such leaders as you, but
because I must not withhold the allegiance which I owe to Germany.
Suffice it to
say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept
because it seems to do justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «
things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe
such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which
such decisions bring about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of
things in that universe.
It's a good
thing god made Jesus Chinese
because he was able to save so many more people that way than had he made Jesus,
say, middle eastern or some
such.
There is no
such thing as your god, which is good
because everything he does and
says is clearly psychotic..
And for anyone who suspects that hemp brownies are truly a throwback to the 60s, let me
say, first of all, that the hemp seeds in these are the edible kind, so you are not ingesting any mind - altering chemicals whatsoever here (unless you count the flood of serotonins in the brain due to their heavenly taste); and second of all, hemp is not the same
thing as hash, and of course the classic hippie confection was a hash brownie; and third of all, how the heck would I even know,
because I never did manage to consume any of the latter, even in my undergrad days,
because I am
such a nerd that nobody ever offered me any, and hash brownies never appealed to me, anyway — I mean, why sully your chocolate with psychedelic drugs?
Remys 1st, he was class according to some here, second match he is shit.just like the case some already
saying he wanted us to buy jovetic just
because he scored 2goals but did nt
say the same
thing when jove was in the physio room last season and will not reapeat it when he gets injured again.most here are quick to
say «i clamoured for a certain player to be bought» when
such a player is performing but none here would
say» i was wrong» on their favourite players (that eventually flop) that we did nt buy.i think i am beginning to understand hafiz now when he named fans favourites: cisse, diame, capoue, victor moses etc..
It doesn't apply
because on occasion folks here need to vent their spleen but if we were being consistent with the concept of performance improvement plans (PIP) developed without offending we would just
say Brad did the best he could, or Al maximized his effort in being the GM, and other
such things.
That's
because it's very easy to
say such things sitting behind your keyboard with ample time to think
things through... as opposed to being a 17 year old with someone suddenly lunging at him in a bar.
Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough
said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome
such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get
things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud
because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer
because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
Ever since Wenger
said after the West Brom debacle that he had made his mind up but hadn't told anybody his decision, I have been keeping an eye on the bookies to see if there is any big movements in the «Wenger to be the Arsenal manager next season» market, simply
because there is no
such thing as a secret nowadays, and if the Boss has made his mind up you can bet your bottom dollar that someone else knows what it is and will tip off his mates on the quiet...
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers
because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who
says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with
such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when
things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when
things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when
things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded
such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to
say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders
because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
There is no real answer to the question you have posed
because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements
because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't
say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all
things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in
such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years
because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as
such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of
things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means
saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great
things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just
such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
It's the fans that keep sacrificing
because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace
such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who
says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving
things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take
things to the next level if everything is as great as you
say?
From the host nation, Georgia, Georgi Silagava,
said: «This is a very big
thing for us,
because Georgia rarely hosts the stars of
such magnitude.
The fact she
said such things I couldn't understand
because I loved my son more than the world and for to
say I would hurt or inflict the same pain that someone inflicted on me or even thought of hurting a child made me sick to my stomach.