Sentences with phrase «say whether the man»

I can't say whether the man is guilty or not.

Not exact matches

It was meant to create a fun way for women to network — a way that men have been networking for years, Roth says, whether it's at the golf course or the cigar club.
Recent data from Redfin found that 46 percent of women buying alone said they first evaluate a home based on whether they love it, compared to 24 percent of men buying alone.
«Whether it's Baton Rouge or Ferguson or Baltimore or Minnesota, we need more community policing,» said Cleve Dunn Jr., a black business man and political consultant in Baton Rouge.
From Uber's toxic workplace, to reports of venture capitalists harassing female entrepreneurs, to that Google bro who posted that manifesto saying women tend to be more neurotic than men even as the company undergoes a federal investigation into whether it pays women less than men... none of this is good.
GOP Representatives Ron DeSantis and Jeff Duncan both said a man police identified as Hodgkinson spoke to them just before the shooting and asked whether the people at the baseball practice were Republicans or Democrats.
Deena Scott said the man she met all those years back has always been focused on giving back to the community, whether volunteering at their church, mentoring others or helping fold socks at a relief center.
Men do not have any say, we are not the ones who decide whether we are allowed to have sex at all unless it is with each other.
In fact, I would say that the manner by which you can affirm that God loves men determines whether or not you have the right orthodoxy.
The Decline of Males, his 1999 book, was particularly controversial among feminists for its argument that female contraceptives had altered the balance between the sexes in disturbing new ways (especially by taking from men any say in whether they could have children).
Some say marriage is fundamentally for a man and women only, and that states should have the religious freedom to choose whether they allow or recognise same - sex unions or not.
I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?
in the day, s that jesus our lord was on the earth (jesus) there was many people named jesus, just as among hispanic and central american peoples, it was a common popular name of many people, if you want to prove to your self that jesus was not married, look up what the apostle said,» i saw standing upon mount zion with the lamb 144,000, these are they that have washed thier robes and were not defilled with women, for they are virgins, jesus emphasised in parts the need and values of a husband and wife in a home, the two mary, s and the women that followed him and ministered unto him tells us the great importance of women, and women in the home, he wanted all married men to have thier own wife, in those days of so many years ago there was false prophets, storytellers, wild imaginations, he told us not to believe them, whether you are catholic, christian, islamic or any other, we can all take pride in the fact what the prohets, jesus and the apostles told us all fits jointly to gether, they were a work of love, to understand the christian bible correctly, islamic people are not rejected, but rather they are a equal, the angel told hagar to return to her mistress, he also told her he would make ishmael a blessing and his seed a great nation, regards
I heard a married man on TV say (regarding whether or not he was going to stay in his own marriage), «I shouldn't be with someone if I'm not happy.»
Whether you like or dislike Schumer, for instance, you are not going to hear him say «I'm not a finance guy, man».
I was mostly reacting to Joni's thoughts about thoughts and whether «as a man thinks in his heart...» really applies to, as you say, spontaneous or deliberate thoughts.
i'm saying that making a straw man (whether * purposeful * or through negligence) is part of the problem, not the solution, if you are actually seeking a genuine dialogue.
I am saying that whether one believes we are under the law or under grace... there is still no biblical mandate of sexual abstinence outside of marriage unless one is a woman and the property of a man whose property value goes down once she is no longer a virgin.
D. Martyn Lloyd - Jones (1899 - 1981)[in an excerpt from Romans: The New Man, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of graMan, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of graman is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of grace.
let not those grieve thee who race each other into Unbelief: (whether it be) among those who say: «We believe» with their lips but whose hearts have no faith; or it be among the Jews, — men who will listen to any lie, — will listen even to others who have never so much as come to thee.
A man wanting to build a tower, Jesus says, will «first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it.»
Therefore when a man is burdened with sorrow, when he falls ill, when he dies, none of those around him can say with certainty whether his being is thereby diminished or increased.
Thus far, with one exception, the sayings have all been clearly of a type for which «the Son of Man» and the first person singular, whether verb or pronoun, were interchangeable.
He asks whether we are to regard the Cross as an opus operatum whose agent achieved something new, radically affected the scheme of things in time, and established in respect of the relations of men and women to God a new foundation: or whether we are compelled, partly by the demands of a theology that would emphasize divine acceptance above divine judgement, to say that all we find here is the most sublime presentation in time of the eternal readiness of God to receive to himself the truly penitent.
Whether we have stopped to speak with a homeless man on the street, or are conversing with a local in a developing country, we adopt an airy sort of tone that — rather unintentionally, I'd say — sets up something of an intellectual hierarchy.
Both can be combined only by saying that man is exposed to the influence of divine grace, which offers him communion with God, whether he accepts it or not.
Rex like you i am saved and that is not dependent on whether i read the bible or tithe or go to church or fellowship i do those things because i love the Lord not because i have to.That is what the Lord meant when he said that the sabbath was for man not man for the sabbath.I agree that to live a christian life the old nature must be crucified with Christ and to live it we must die to it daily by submitting all our hearts to God and be lead by his holy spirit.brentnz
I wonder what that man would have said, could I have asked him whether he was concerned about our nation's need for a renewal of powerful, ethical religion that would re-establish faith in spiritual realities and values, and elevate the standards of personal and public integrity.
What was at stake was not anthropopathic descriptions of God but whether God had freedom of will in roughly the same sense that man may be said to have freedom of will.
In fact, I would say that the manner by which you can affirm that God loves men determines whether or not you have the right....
But then he goes on to say «He said the group erected the sign in a high - traffic area in an effort to challenge drivers to «think hard about whether or not they actually believe in what is, in reality, an invisible magic man in the sky.»
>> whether if their own loved ones were threatened by >> say a man with a knife at their loved ones throat >> and they had a gun would they use it?
I always ask a pacifist if he or she would be willing to live without a police department or whether if their own loved ones were threatened by say a man with a knife at their loved ones throat and they had a gun would they use it?
This «saying» is thus nothing other than the «I - Thou» relation whether it be the full, reciprocal I - Thou relation between men or the less complete and non-reciprocal relation with nature or in artistic creation and appreciation.
If it were true that what every man says about the state of his health (as to whether he is sick or well, where he suffers, etc.) were absolutely to be relied upon, it would be an illusion to be a physician.
It is extremely difficult to say whether prophetic man loved God for God's sake or for his own sake.
He said the group erected the sign in a high - traffic area in an effort to challenge drivers to «think hard about whether or not they actually believe in what is, in reality, an invisible magic man in the sky.»
For Karl Barth man always appears to remain on the knife edge between the love of God and the abyss of damnation.24 Reinhold Niebuhr holds that we are redeemed from sin in principle, but whether we are redeemed in fact is not made clear.25 Christ, he says, is our hope, not our possession.26 And again he suggests that only in the moment of prayer can man really love God and his neighbor with the love which Christ has shown to us.27 Emil Brunner comes closer to positive affirmation of the new life of the man to whom the love of God has come with power.
True, it goes without saying that if a man can not in conscience accept the doctrine of the Church as the norm of his faith, this must be respected by others, whether they think his view right or not; and the Church, too, must respect such a conviction and may not suppress it by social pressures or prevent its expression.
There is much that might be said about this; but let us pass over the question of whether we have not undergone some modification, even m our chromosomes, since the era of the pre-Hominids or even that of Cro - magnon man.
Whether God said it or whether it's man's perspWhether God said it or whether it's man's perspwhether it's man's perspective.
Too often, nothing is ever said about whether these horrible men are handed over to law enforcement.
If you read Luke, you will find in the same page this gentleman Luke mentioned (not sure whether he really said it or someone else said and used his name) «son of man», «son of God» and so on....
The important question about the story of man's creation and fall is whether we believe what it is trying to say about God and man and human history.
To be fair though, she said she would also never vote for a self - proclaimed evangelist whether they are men or women.
He said his goal with the man was to give him a choice whether he would live or die.
Socrates says that when he was a young man he had a consuming interest in natural science, always seeking into the causes of things, and asking such questions as whether organic growth is due to fermentation caused by variations of temperature, and whether thought and memory can be explained in terms of the brain.
There are some who argue that these verses clearly speak of pederasty (the practice of keeping a catamite — a boy kept for sexual relations with a man), and therefore have nothing to say concerning the current debate as to whether consensual, monogamous gay relationships are an acceptable Christian option.
We don't know whether he was a cold man with habitually averted eyes who never saw the beggar at all or whether he did notice, maybe said a prayer for a sorry case, but stuck to his policy of never giving anything directly to street people.
This concern was reflected in the life style of one who said, «I have come that men may have life in all its fullness» (John 10:10 NEB) Every clergyman is deeply involved in mental health concerns whether he knows it or not.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z