Sentences with phrase «saying about the readers»

I'm not agreed you are saying about the Readers Hub.

I like what you have said about this reader so far But could you talk more about the connectivity issue.

And what does that say about reader standards?

Or, as the uncles of the world never fail to say about the readers of children's literature, «my, how you've grown.»

I agree with what you said about readers; what they really want seems to be easy access to the content.

Not exact matches

Be clear, concise and direct with the message you wish to convey, leaving the reader in no doubt whatsoever about what it is you are trying to say.

Alex Miller, the global head of content at VICE Media, said in a statement that its readers «care deeply about freedom of speech and human rights» and that's why the company decided to launch the campaign for Rasool's release.

Whether an average shortfall of 37 % says more about the analysis or the device is a question I leave to the reader.

Here in the real world, readers care not just about what you say but what it looks like on the screen too (as anyone who has every instantly clicked away from a blog post in an insane font or with wonky formatting can attest).

Where you set the scene and tell your readers everything they need to know to understand why what you're about to say is important.

«With online publicity, you need to reach out and find people that are enthusiastic about your type of business and are willing to share it with their readers, who come to them specifically to hear about their tastes and opinions on that specific subject matter,» McLean says.

«I might lose whatever credibility I have with readers if I suggested flat out that a book centered around the subject of oil, written by an economist, was a page - turner, but I am willing to say with conviction that Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller, by former CIBC Chief Economist Jeff Rubin, is a fantastically compelling read.

To date, I have received about 60 emails from readers who said they were interested in attending.

If you're a regular reader of the HubSpot blog, what I'm about to say next shouldn't shock you: Use a blog on your website to write about your industry.

You might think it will convince a casual reader to invest their time in your article if you can persuade them that M & S are a mandatory part of contemporary cultural literacy, but really, the most relevant question in a reader's mind is not whether the topic is important but whether it is entertaining or enlightening, and whether you have anything entertaining or enlightening to say about it.

You're right I suppose, the bible doesn't say anything about how it should or shouldn't be taken seriously, I guess only non-fiction both has to show their bonafides in order to prove the validity of the material its presenting and not asking the reader to just go with it, or «have faith it's right»....

I agree with all the positive things Travis LaCouter said yesterday about Adam Greene's Bibliotheca Kickstarter campaign, an effort to present a reader's edition of the Bible, stripped of all verse numbers and other annotations and bound in four handsome volumes, one for the Law, one for the Prophets, one for the Writings, and one for the New Testament.

Then we wrote this article, fulfilling the prophecy of a supposed RELEVANT reader who tweeted: «Aaaand que RELEVANT with an article titled «You won't believe what Chris Pratt just said about prayer!»

I would say to any person commenting on your 10 Ways the Non-Violent Atonement Changes Your Theology blog, to read your book first (its not an expensive purchase) before launching into any detailed discussion or disagreement.It answers many of the potential concerns people have and gets the reader to reflect very strongly on what they have been taught about the atonement and to put on a new set of glasses when reading scripture.

Would you say that womanist perspectives on the Old Testament are more about finding the redemptive notes in what I often take to be an oppressive narrative for women, or is it more about reimagining the central messages and letting it speak fresh to a modern reader?

The upside is that readers can go along with all the nice things he says about God's love, as Pope Francis apparently did, and not be sticklers for the details.

Enough has been said about sin earlier in the book, particularly in chapter three, that I trust no reader will think I regard it as incidental.

Biblicism falls apart, Smith says, because of the «the problem of pervasive interpretive pluralism,» for «even among presumably well - intentioned readers — including many evangelical biblicists — the Bible, after their very best efforts to understand it, says and teaches very different things about most significant topics... It becomes beside the point to assert a text to be solely authoritative or inerrant, for instance, when, lo and behold, it gives rise to a host of many divergent teachings on important matters.»

I must say (and I want readers to be absolutely clear about this) that all the political and social movements which Christian friends of mine have joined precisely because they wanted to help the poor — that these movements very rarely show a concern to seek out, to find, to help the really poor.

As my friends, family, and readers already know, I have an opinion about nearly everything — religion, politics, theology, entertainment, lifestyle, college football, driving, world affairs, and whether or not that coffee mug in the kitchen cabinet is light gray or light blue (it's light blue, I say!)

Mark appears to say nothing about Jesus» suspect birth, but for Jewish readers his account is the most damning of all because he refers to «Jesus, son of Mary».

In response to our coordinate efforts for Mutuality 2012, I have heard from women who say they feel their dignity and worth have been restored, from multiple readers who have changed their minds about women in ministry, from couples relieved that they can finally put a name to how their relationship has functioned all along, from singles freshly inspired by the «great cloud of witnesses» that surrounds them, from followers of Jesus whose passion for justice and equality has been renewed, from women ready to «get on with it» and stop asking permission to use their gifts and start unapologetically using them.

Both books encourage the reader to look at what the Bible says about what is going on in the world around us that we never see.

In addition, the «About this blog» section above states as part of its purpose,»... fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers» lives,» and like I said before, unfortunately for me and others like me, your beliefs and the beliefs of others like you can play a role in our lives, so we are involved alrAbout this blog» section above states as part of its purpose,»... fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers» lives,» and like I said before, unfortunately for me and others like me, your beliefs and the beliefs of others like you can play a role in our lives, so we are involved alrabout the role of religion and belief in readers» lives,» and like I said before, unfortunately for me and others like me, your beliefs and the beliefs of others like you can play a role in our lives, so we are involved already.

Reblogged this on usmcvball and commented: Some «off - topic» stuff, for those readers who want to know more about why I say what I say... CM

3Eslick points out that at the crucial passage in Process and Reality in which Whitehead says Descartes» concept of substance is a true derivative from Aristotle's, Whitehead refers the reader not to Aristotle's Categories but to W. D. Ross's book about Aristotle (SCCW 504).

When we said ambiguously negative things about Rand (or Randians) and Michael, we got lots of readers we soon lost when we lost interest in their heroes.

The reader may have wondered why I have not yet said much about human sinfulness.

Actually a fourth and least authoritative line of inquiry might be added, consisting of (4) «Mere Rumors and Things Said by Bertrand Russell on this Subject» postmodernist readers may wish employ the same four lines of inquiry, and simply reverse the amount of attention given to each, and they might also add an account of the telling things that no one said or thought about Bergson and WhitehSaid by Bertrand Russell on this Subject» postmodernist readers may wish employ the same four lines of inquiry, and simply reverse the amount of attention given to each, and they might also add an account of the telling things that no one said or thought about Bergson and Whitehsaid or thought about Bergson and Whitehead.

Robert L. Wilken, also familiar to our readers, says, «Hans Urs von Balthasar is a thrilling writer and Edward Oakes has written a thrilling book about him....

PJS: Before talking about the contents of the Reader, I have to say that I was struck by something you mentioned in the introduction: how terrible the readily accessible translations of many of these documents are.

All the semiological systems, along with the linguistic system, must be decoded, and, as Ricoeur says, «that requires a special affinity between the reader and the kind of things the text is about» (19) What is appropriated is not a system of ideas but deep values of truth that are imposed «with such power that no further proof is needed to perceive their validity and reality».

I think a simple reading of what Jesus said about marriage in general will show you what a careless reader you are.

-- What did the book of Daniel say to all its readers throughout the centuries if all these chapters are about an already determined future far, faraway?

What von Däniken actually says about religion is not immediately clear to me, though it seems to be clear to some of his readers — for instance, to the retired Denver businessman who, after reading Chariots of the Gods?

Perhaps most poignantly, one reader who read the book in light of the pedophilia scandals and the church's early secrecy about them says, tentatively but tellingly: «With all that is going on in the Catholic Church today, it makes you wonder if some of the fiction is actually true.»

I believe that most pacifists assume that their readers know what they are talking about when they say that they are non-violent or pacifist.

Most readers unobsessed with literalism find that these stories say very little about the mechanics of birth, but a great deal about the dimensions of faith in threatening circumstances.

If it interests you or any of your readers, I wrote a book called Nine Lies People Believe About Speaking in Tongues, and deal with many things I see come up in these comments like Paul said you can't speak in tongues in a meeting unless you have an interpreter, speaking several languages allegedly being the same thing as speaking in tongues in the Bible, etc...

The controversy has been sparked by what Pastor Benke actually said in his prayer — and here Mr. Nuechterlein does a disservice to his readers by failing to provide a single bit of information about the content of Dr. Benke's prayer.

A footnote refers the reader to Romans 1:26 - 28, but there is no indication of scholarly discussion among Scripture experts as to what precisely Paul is saying about the relationship between homosexuality and unbelief.

As I've spoken with my readers, several of them have expressed interest in the sources you used while researching A New Kind of Christianity — some because they are skeptical about your scholarship, others because they liked what you said and want to learn more.

Writing about «Harbor Seals,» also from The Theology of Doubt, Holden said the poem «charms the reader, even as it tempts the reader into a corner... that will require the reader to make a moral choice as well as to reconsider many other kinds of choices about what to «believe.»

Autobiographical fallacies aside, I can now only repeat something Borges said, a paraphrase of Mark Twain he cited in reviewing Kipling's autobiography (Something of Myself) in El Hogar: «It is not possible for a man to tell the truth about himself, or to keep from conveying to the reader the truth about himself.»

What makes the Bible such a great book is that it shows the truth about humanity, the evil that sin creates and the truth that the devil is a liar and as Jeremy has stated, has always laid the blame on GOD, but, myself being a fairly new Christian, know that we can not pull certain verses or stories from the Bible to try and understand what GOD is doing, (and I also know that you and your readers know this but I'm saying it anyway) it's history, HIS Story, and when taken as a whole we can see HIS plan laid out, from creation to the cross and then throughout eternity, GOD is good and gracious to ALL!!!! (2 Peter 3:8,9).