Not exact matches
To
say the
church is non-transitory shows that you know very little
about the
history of your own religion.
And frankly, given the Catholic
church's
history I'd
say their credibility is
about as low as it gets in the realm of Christianity.
Yes, the available
history says that the heart was in the possession of the
church about a century later, so either someone kept it for a long time after cutting it out of his corpse — yeah, that sounds likely — or it is a medieval «relic» that is actually the heart of a pig or a sheep that some clergyman sold along with genuine pieces of the cross and bones from St. Peter to make a buck on the rubes, uh, faithful.
Even if what has been
said is found acceptable, differences of opinion may persist
about various particular questions of
history and the day to day life of the
Church, and in fact remain insoluble, and therefore have to be borne in patience.
Nygren gives an important suggestion
about the
history of doctrine when he
says that the
Church Fathers were saved from falling completely into a Greek pattern of thought by the three biblical assertions of Creation, Incarnation, and Resurrection.32 But rather than conclude, as Nygren does, that these themes require us to reject all metaphysics, why not
say that they require us to reconsider our metaphysics?
So it seems all the more difficult to accept the Bible as authoritative just because somebody — tradition or the early
Church —
says so, when in fact these somebodies did not know as much
about the Bible's
history and background and diverse elements as we do today.
I have come to my beliefs in what the bible is
saying though many years of reading the bible, reading
about the
history of the
church and how it has read the bible, studying the original languages, and above all praying that the Spirit guides me in all I do.
People who
say religious dialog is more vitriolic than ever know nothing
about church history.
Just think
about the implication through
church history of what you are suggesting (not
saying bad
about another person....).
Can we
say «
history aided, prompted, or forced the
Church to recognize what exactly constitutes the truth of a doctrine,» and what
about the prompting and directing role of the Holy Spirit?
«So as much as people talk
about my
history with the African - American
church and such, I would
say that there were all these other things that were formulative in helping me understand the complexity of the life of a thing,» Gates
said.