He isnt
saying anything false, those players are there!
Not exact matches
«As the actor in the film, you just have to step away and
say, I don't know
anything, really, and whether any of it is true or
false.
Assume
anything they
say is
false.
There is much that could be
said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is
false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for
anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Other than Atheist — they all have a book that they follow... so I was
saying everyone to go and sit down with the book that you follow which you may think that this is True (other wise you will not follow if u think its
false) and see if you find
anything...
Marcie: You
said: «The idea that
anything we can learn or gain answers to, is «outside» the creator, is in many senses
false.
It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to
say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is
false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to prove
anything And no, I don't need knee pads.
I'd hate to summarize
anything as beautiful as what you've written by throwing out cliches like true church vs.
false church, or buildings vs. community of faith, so I'll just
say this.
As someone who * does * think that AP is far too prone to use
false benchmarks to measure parenting, I have to
say that you don't seem to have provided
anything in the link above to counter this.
I think anybody who is asked that question... it would kind of be
false if I
said, no, I can't think of
anything else.
The cynical consortium of special interests aligned to defeat the constitutional convention have made it clear that they are willing to do or
say anything — no matter how
false or unethical — to deceive New Yorkers and deny them a chance to take back their government from the corrupt status quo.
Also, people making this «anyone can
say anything» argument keep forgetting that making a
false affidavit is a serious crime, punishable by jail time and major fines.
While she was happy to accept Bill Clinton's help then later «fearlessly» denounce him, it remains to be seen if Sen. Gillibrand will have
anything to
say about her hometown cult that attacked her father with [
false?]
Anyone can
say anything, especially a convicted felon spinning a tale, but it's just
false and delusional.»
We'll try to make this as clear as possible so that even these disingenuous Democrats can understand the facts — Sue Serino voted against the energy tax because her hardworking constituents couldn't afford it, and
saying anything else is patently
false.
My endocrinologist
said not to read
anything on the internet because it was mostly
false and scary.
«Customer Reviews» Are
False: Of the 24 «customer reviews» for Match.com, not a single one
says anything bad.
As the actor in the film, you just have to step away and
say, I don't know
anything, really, and whether any of it is true or
false.
I do nt believe in
anything ms is
saying with all the backtracking and
false advertisment they put out.
ANYTHING that
says «AGW is
false» is accepted without thought.
you
said: «Conclusion, the statement that a thing is not true if we can not prove it is shown
false» of course, i never
said anything like that.
Second, when someone cherrypicks 0.1 % of a large email record, the person doing the cherrypicking can make the emails
say anything they want, even things that are outright
false.
Yes, one can
say our goldilocks universal forces are like throwing paint on a wall, predicting before hand that some spots will be exactly one inch from their nearest neighboring spot, and then finding out that some few actually are, and then determining it
false to pretend it is
anything but random.
He doesn't do
anything to show the problem with using his methodology is irrelevant to his conclusions so how can he
say it shows
anything is entirely
false?
Objectively,
anything he
says is highly likely to be
false.
It is a
false equivalency to
say that in this scientific dialogue that there are «two sides», unless you mean one side that is backed by 200 years of science and physical observations and the other side which is basically
saying «no it isn't» without
anything to support their nay -
saying.
They gave me a quick little brief: They're both federal investigators,
anything I
say has to be truthful or honest, I could be prosecuted for providing
false information — a bunch of stuff like that, so immediately, I
said, I would like to be open with you guys but this is sounding like an «I should get a lawyer» kind of conversation.»