Sentences with phrase «says about the formation»

The end result is that we can agree with much of what science says about the formation of the Grand Canyon while at the same time, seeing that such views are supported and defended by Scripture.

Here is what he says about the formation of the church:

Not exact matches

The U.S. Geological Survey said the Mancos Shale formation in Colorado's Piceance (PEE» - yahns) Basin holds about 66.3 trillion cubic feet of gas, up from 1.6 trillion estimated in 2003.

«Understanding how planets form is important if we're to understand the formation of the Earth, and ultimately, how we got here,» said Erik Petigura, co-author of the paper about the Neptune - sized planet, to the Guardian.

What he was getting round to saying was that «Failing to recognise RE amongst the humanities... surely implies a judgment about what religious education can contribute towards the formation and education of the human person?»

There is no explicit doctrine of the Trinity in the gospels, but these sayings about the Counselor became important material for the formation of that doctrine when, because of certain external pressures in the fourth century, the relation between God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit needed to be made explicit.

Thus the function which the tradition about Jesus performed in the life and worship of the Church came to be recognized as the organizing principle in the formation of the individual stories and sayings, and in the formation of the Gospels themselves.

Anticipating my reaction, he adds, «Some people are concerned about naturalism,» but attempts to explain away that concern by saying, «If one is happy with natural explanations of the formation of stars and planetary systems, why not of plants and animals?»

DeBouchy — enough said... I feel for this player because he was one of the only Wenger players ever that he gave up on because of injury so there must be something we don't know about this situation... strangely enough his skill - set is much better suited for our current formation than Bellerin

SEE MORE: How England could line up using Liverpool's highly successful 3 -4-3 formation, with new role for Sterling Six England humiliations: Joe Hart saying he knows nothing about Lithuania may have been unwise No fear!

The tactics of 4 -1-4-1 has led the players astray, meaning they do not know crap about the formation so the run around the place without any direction > The players role in this formation have not been define, what i am basically saying they do not know what is their function (what to do)

I do not think we can say the same thing of Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain, though, despite the boss saying a lot of good things about the dynamic England international and despite the fact that he seems to have found a new lease of life as a wing back in Wenger's new three at the back formation.

Its almost as if they shit themselves and backed off of city and as Ive already said there was None in the team who wants to own the responsibility when the chips are down everyone turns their backs and more or less says «its not down to me» «its not my responsibility» and Wenger who should be appointing a player to lead when we are up against it or at least chopping and changing formations ect and revitalising the side just rants at the ref and means about offside.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I think all AFC supporters will get excited about those two, I will go as far to say that next season could see AFC with one of the best defs if we keep this 3 CB formation.

Now I know lots of people have probably said enough about his impact and the formation he'll fit in so I'll go at it from another angle.

I know mertesacker has been very poor and is not probably not the right person to be talking about our form but what he said is right, it's like our players are starting to see some of the flaws in the way we play, our tactics and our formations.

the game there has changed before the match i was thinking about a formation but flamini was not available in my formation carzola was not in for the simple reason he put a lot work in the last match i would have picked wallcott rosciky and gabrial having said that when the player sheet came out my first thought was yup the team is balanced the bench constituted walcott and chambarelain (speed) so in essence the plan was ok but it just was a disaster The 22 million dollar question who would one pick to secure a win in Monaco and advance into the quarter finals of the champion league

Walcott said yesterday that he spoke to Wenger about playing a new position within the 343 formation

When asked about a formation change, Giroud said he'd obviously prefer a» four - four - two» System.

In the previous article about formation, where I the players decided to have a meeting and change our style against mancity and Manu at home... some were asking me what about the other games that he won... (NY gunner aka AKB) and some other dude I don't really know here said I am a child..

Gillibrand, a resident of Greenport in Columbia County, said that while Marcellus Shale gas would provide an economic shot in the arm, she doesn't want to support hydrofracking until she has answers to questions about the process of pumping chemicals under intense pressure into the shale formation.

Clegg said the Conservatives are in such «a total lather about Ukip» that they are even «bizarrely tearing up their own homework» as their own former prime minister Margaret Thatcher oversaw the formation of the common market.

While giving his remaks, CVL founder and renowned development expert, Professor Pat Utomi said the idea behind the formation of the group was to get young people to begin to appreciate early what leadership was all about being service to the people.

We will also apply for more observation time on the ALMA telescope to study the planet - forming discs in even higher resolution to get more detailed information about their chemical composition,» says Jes Jørgensen, associate professor in the research group Astrophysics and Planetary Science at the Niels Bohr Institute and Centre for Star and Planet Formation, University of Copenhagen.

«That would mean that this is a really rare system at an early stage of formation,» said Binder, «and we could learn a lot about how massive stars form and die by continuing to study this unique pairing.»

That plants like bryophytes influenced the formation of mud deposits long before roots appeared is a surprise, says geobiologist Woodward Fischer of Caltech who wrote a commentary about the study for the same issue of Science.

Plunkett said the technology allows researchers to determine details about the star formation process, such as how often material is accreted or ejected, on time scales of a few hundred years.

«Ours isn't the only group looking for planets around young stars, and my hope is that astronomers can find enough of them to shed light on some of the nagging questions about planet formation,» Johns - Krull said.

«When most people think about cancer genetics, they think about single key mutations that foster tumor formation — very specific things like the BRCA genes,» said Joe R. Delaney, PhD, a fellow in the Clinical Translation program at UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center and lead author of the paper published February 15 in Nature Communications.

TrES - 4 is so large and light that it challenges existing ideas about planet formation, says Georgi Mandushev, an astronomer at the Lowell Observatory who led the team that found the planet.

«Heavyweight clusters like El Gordo must be very rare, but they're not in conflict with our ideas about structure formation in the Universe,» he says.

«We found that PAI - 039 decreased blockage formation by about 50 percent, which is a powerful effect in the models we used,» said Fay, who also serves as a research scientist at the Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans» Hospital in Columbia, Missouri.

«Confined space is a somewhat exotic space that we have not explored much, and we are always thinking about new material formation without any limitation of space,» Jun said.

«If it's true that a galaxy exists where there is hardly any dark matter, I think that's a problem for all theories about galaxy formation,» says Erik Verlinde, a theoretical physicist at the University of Amsterdam who has proposed an alternative to dark - matter - dominated gravity and was not involved in the research.

But because stellar - formation models assume that identical twins form more or less simultaneously, the discovery «tells us that there may be something fundamental about the stellar birth process that we still don't understand,» Stassun says.

The data also reveal a lot about star formation within the galaxy, says astrophysicist and team leader Raghunathan Srianand of the Inter University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics in Pune, India.

The research is valuable because it shows how studying the formation of the first stars can help scientists learn more about the nature of dark matter, says astronomer Volker Bromm of the University of Texas, Austin.

«Learning about the formation of Jupiter enlightens us about the formation of all the planets and what went on in the early solar system,» says Scott Bolton, the project's principal investigator.

«You really have to think about star formation in a kind of urban, suburban, and rural context,» Goodman says.

«The emitted gravitational - wave signal and its potential detection will inform researchers about the formation process of the first supermassive black holes in the still very young universe, and may settle some — and raise new — important questions on the history of our universe,» he says.

«Based on what we know about star formation in galaxies of different types, we can infer when and how many black holes formed in each galaxy,» Elbert said.

The study will nevertheless help scientists to learn more about the molecular processes that control the formation of both sperm and oocytes and could lead to a better understanding of infertility, says Anna Wobus of the Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research in Gatersleben, Germany.

It says nothing about how the black holes originally formed or how, in an apparent case of tail wags dog, they managed to control the formation of entire galaxies.

Van Nieuwenhuise said oil producers long have been puzzled about the Wilcox Formation's appearance in the Gulf's deeper waters, hundreds of miles from where it appears onshore.

«In some ways, InSight is like a scientific time machine that will bring back information about the earliest stages of Mars» formation 4.5 billion years ago,» said Bruce Banerdt, the principal investigator for InSight at JPL.

«This is a rate of star formation more than 300 times greater than that in our own Milky Way and similar spiral galaxies, and our discovery may provide important information about the formation and evolution of galaxies throughout the Universe,» said Philip Solomon, of Stony Brook University in New York.

Dubbed «CL J1001 +0220,» or «CL J1001» in short, the galaxy cluster is located about 11.1 billion light - years from Earth, pushing back the formation time of galaxy clusters — which consist of thousands of galaxies bound together by gravity — by about 700 million light - years, NASA said.

«Our galaxy is so similar to Andromeda, it really helps us to be able to study it, because we can learn more about our galaxy and its formation,» study co-author Regina Caputo, a research scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said in the statement.

We basically went up there to look at the context and find out just how these things are formed on Earth, and then try to draw some conclusions about their formation mechanisms on Mars,» said Steele.