Sentences with phrase «says god exists»

What's the difference between a billboard that says god exists and one that says god doesn't exist?

btw, the same bible that says god exists also says the earth is flat.

Saying my book says god exists is not proof.

Where in any of those quotes does it say god exists outside of time and space?

Mom called today, she said God exists too.

If that were the case, one could say God exists, but for all practical purposes here on Earth he doesn't.

i agree that we can not say god exists or has being as we know it.

Saying god exists does not make that so... of course the opposite is true as well... all the pundits here (and Hawking) who like to call things by descriptive names like «fairy tales» do so because they are desperate to be right in this matter... because no one can be proven right or wrong in this I choose to respect the faith that some have in Science as well as thos who have faith in God's existence.

People saying god exists and people saying no he doesn't.

I'm typing right now, because I feel someone needs to say God exists and that he created everything... because I know it's true... I don't believe it, I know it.

Just like you saying god exists or wants certain things doesn't make it so.

Since the burden of proof lies first and foremost with those making the extraordinary claim — believers who say their god exists — non-believers don't need reasons not to believe.

You say your god exists, I say I want physical evidence for this and until I see that evidence I see no reason to believe... now provide that evidence!!

As for Rev Parsons, saying god exists is the equivalent of lying when it can't back its claims with substantial evidence... neither it or just spewin» can be trusted on their opinion... if they really believe in this god, then they have sinned and are both destined for their fairy land land of hell.

You say god exists; the nonbeliever says, «Prove it.»

mentality, with said gods existing because it is «we» who are paying them to look after and perpetuate themselves, by the way.

Not exact matches

Another thing — people that believe in God ARE going to teach their children about Him (even if He doesn't exist as you say)-- why wouldn't we?

Obviously said author suffers from said sickness as noted in his / her final line: «The fact, God does exist, it's only Love».

To say that God and heaven don't exist is getting into areas that he is not an expert in.

To say that Jesus was not God and / or that God does not exist is a perfectly reasonable position to hold.

And as you say goodbye to your church, consider why a god, if He existed, would hand over your church t the Catholics.

As a reminder an atheist is not someone saying» god (s) do not exist», it is «I don't believe god (s) exist» huge difference.

In my brain I know god doesn't exist, so when I walk by a sign that says something about Jesus (which is quite often around here) ya know what I do?

You said, «So you seem to be saying that «Random chance is a better explanation that the existence of God if God doesn't exist.»

Saying that God is real over and over just reinforces your belief that he is, it doesn't actually prove that he does exist.

You said, «You have every right not to believe in God, but there are no facts that make it obvious that God doesn't exist.

Lin, keep in mind that if you do everything they say, and still don't experience god it just means you are doing it wrong, not that god doesn't exist.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

You can say that you don't believe in Jesus Christ, you can say you don't believe he's God, it doesn't change the fact that he exist and is lord over all; just take a deep breath and look at all that surrounds you.

You said, «But if God does exist, then His actions don't require magic, any more than do the actions of anyone else.»

You do this because you don't want to believe God is there, and your defense mechanism is to deny what they said was obvious, all of them... much like I'm telling you now, God exists.

A non-religious person can say «the universe always existed» every bit as easily as a religious person can say «God always existed».

For anyone to say god any god exists is pure arrogance as much as for those to say one doesn't.

You said,» -LSB-...] we can conclude that God exists.»

So you seem to be saying that «Random chance is a better explanation that the existence of God if God doesn't exist.»

I know even some believers are offended by some of the things I write, but to them I'll simply say this: the Word of God is the most powerful thing that exists - both the written word and the Living word; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the present.

Since YOU, god, do not exist, you have said absolutely nothing.

You said, «My point was that in referring to God as an imaginary friend, you are assuming God doesn't exist.»

I'm not saying that our existence isn't already strange enough, that God couldn't exist, I just think it's offense to not allow people to mourn because we have to be conditioned into saying that senseless deaths are the necessary catalyst, to bring communities together in the praise of God.

In order to say anything about a god existing, or reating, or doing anything, one assumes a PROCESS, and all processes require time.

You said, «It is not sufficient to show objectively that God does not exist,» I don't claim to show that gods don't exist.

So when someone says «I believe in God,» they are really saying «I think God exists» and «I believe in religion,» but churches need to get people thinking and saying a phrase much strong than those in order to get them to do stuff like give the church money, so they snagged «believe in.»

Saying god ordered the words of my book so he exists is not proof.

saying that you are not religious and you don't know does not change the fact that God exist and he want to have a relationship with you.

I knew long ago that God exists, based purely on what he said.

The voice that says «Personally I don't think God exists, I believe God IS existence... and since «I» exist, I am god... there is no absolute truth... right is what is right for me... right is what i say is rigGod exists, I believe God IS existence... and since «I» exist, I am god... there is no absolute truth... right is what is right for me... right is what i say is rigGod IS existence... and since «I» exist, I am god... there is no absolute truth... right is what is right for me... right is what i say is riggod... there is no absolute truth... right is what is right for me... right is what i say is right.

Even though you don't believe this happened, you'll have to admit that today, if Jesus Christ appeared to you and said «touch me if you don't believe I exist» - and you touched the apparition - your state of intelligent evolution (for lack of a better way of describing it) would leave you unsatisfied you touched God.

This is not to say that God exists, just that you should reexamine this argument and how you view... well everything

I didn't say a god doesn't exist until you prove it does.

You said, «A real atheist wouldn't talk about the possibility gods exist (even an off - chance).»