Sentences with phrase «says nothing»

Again, this says nothing about the inherent ethical superiority of secularism, but it does dispel the myth that the irreligious are somehow less moral than those with a religion.

Although it comes up early in almost every open discussion or Q / A session concerning final punishment, the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus says nothing about the nature of hell or what happens to those who finally go there.

The first verse you quoted (John 3:16) says nothing about about God killing His Son.

Jeebus says NOTHING about salvation.

According to Luke, who actually says nothing of the meal itself, Jesus said before giving the disciples either wine or bread (22:15 - 16), «I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer; for I tell you I shall not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.»

But specification of these combinations says nothing about the possible organizing principles that «harness» biochemical processes and integrate them into hierarchically higher dimensions of being — life and mind.

Note as well that my proposal here says nothing about children who die before they are old enough to understand the Gospel, nor does it say anything about people who are mentally handicapped who can never understand much of anything about the Gospel.

«But I practice something similar but at its core significantly different and it's lovely and empowering and great,» says nothing about the purity movement.

And the fact that NDE's are sometimes consistent with a person's religion says nothing about whether they are true and a lot about what we expect of religion.

But even that stronger form says nothing about certainty.

This article says nothing at all.

The text says nothing at all about sacrifice or atonement.

But beyond that, this passage says nothing about God's approved method for preaching and teaching.

The «bible» does say to be fruitful and multiply; it says nothing about treating gods creation as junk.

I don't think that such a way of reading Revelation means that the book says nothing about a future Tribulation and Millennium.

Therefore, we tread on dangerous ground if we claim that Genesis 3:21 contains the first sacrifice in Scripture, for it says nothing of the sort.

Simply saying that the earth is open to the energy from the sun says nothing about how that raw solar heat is converted into increased complexity in any system, open or closed.

Again, while many Christmas carols and stories seem to indicate that Joseph and Mary entered Bethlehem late at night while she is in the middle of birth pains, and he frantically knocks on doors seeking a place to stay, the text says nothing like this.

There, in his otherwise lucid and illuminating explanation of Whitehead's doctrine of creativity (pp. 81 - 87), he says nothing of «the many becoming one» with its strong note of the agency of the many, and he identifies creativity instead exclusively with the «self - creating activity» (p. 87) of concrescing occasions.

observer Newton's law says nothing about Joshua's account of the power of God stopping the motion of the sun and the moon.

Barr, treating Darwinism with great delicacy, says nothing.

It says nothing about a person who got saved and then later decided to live in unrepentant sin and tell God that they no longer believe in him and don't want to go to heaven.

Newton's law says nothing about the miraculous force of God stopping the moon and the sun.

Sorry, but what part of the bible are you studing, GOD never leaves you, He just does nt, it says nothing seperates us from his love and power and He himself said the same.

observer Again you quote out of context as Newton's law says nothing about Joshua's account of the power of God stopping the motion of the sun and the moon.

Galatians 6:8 says nothing about a person losing their salvation.

Oddly enough, it says nothing about not raping and coercing children.

The belief that there are no gods says nothing about what is right or wrong.

Whatever Paul said is not the same as what Jesus is quoted as saying in the gospels — we all have these texts and we can check them ourselves... Jesus says nothing on homosexuality — but why?

He says nothing of substance, instead repeating the same sentence over and over... no scritpure to back him up... just a flamer.

It says nothing about the reliability of the one source.

It says NOTHING about the loving respectful relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

theo The universe says nothing about god.

I understand the urge to refute the Bible, but this discovery says nothing other than the fact that we haven't found bones older than the 10th century B.C. Does that mean there are none?

Those who are Buddhists will follow one set of laws, secular humanists on, Utilitarians on, Unitarian Universalists one (with a lot of variation), etc. «Atheism» in itself says nothing at all about one's ethical beliefs.

She says nothing of the Scriptures» teachings elsewhere about homosexuality, for instance.

You said, «We live in a society that says nothing is wrong; everything you do is O.K. and if you have a problem like an unwanted pregnancy just ignore it / make it go away.»

Atheism is simply a lack of belief in god and says nothing about how we raise our children (other than implying that we don't brain - wash them with religious indoctrination).

If you pay attention, the article says nothing disparaging about Jesus.

We live in a society that says nothing is wrong; everything you do is O.K. and if you have a problem like an unwanted pregnancy just ignore it / make it go away.

It says nothing about the city never being rebuilt.

The Bible says nothing about «monsters» in Exodus 20:4.

St. Paul's ideas about the «sacrifice» are FAR different from those of Mark, (who says NOTHING about a sacrifice).

Our caretakers say she was probably sexually assaulted, but she says nothing about it.

That it came into existence from a singularity says nothing about the medium into which and from which it arose.

Thous shalt not murder — says nothing about anger — but Jesus asks us to even deal with that attitude (which is different for each person)... and a good freedom comes from seeing the usefulness of these things.

The provision, adopted prior to Roe v. Wade, says nothing about «reproductive rights.»

If he says nothing, then he may need to explain how the election of the Brunne differs ecumenically from the American election of Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson.

it says nothing abotu a woman having to marry a man.

Why would anyone be scared off a moron who knows nothing, talk, talk, talk and says nothing?